Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Aalberts, J., Koster, E., & Boschhuizen, R. (2012). From prejudice to reasonable judgement: Integrating (moral) value discussions in university courses. Journal of Moral Education, 41(4), 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2012.677600
• Aivelo, T., & Uitto, A. (2019). Teachers’ choice of content and consideration of controversial and sensitive issues in teaching of secondary school genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2716-2735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1694195
• Alexander, C. C., Gaudier-Diaz, M. M., Kleinschmit, A. J., Dihle, P. J., Salger, S. A., Vega, N., & Robertson, S. D. (2024). A case study to engage students in the research design and ethics of high-throughput metagenomics. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 25(1), Article e00074-23. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00074-23
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
• Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2009). Inquiry and analysis VALUE rubric. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Rozenblum, Y. (2025). Empirically testing a shared assumption: The usefulness of science education to science-informed decision-making in the context of COVID-19. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2521141
• Bayanova, A. R., Orekhovskaya, N. A., Sokolova, N. L., Shaleeva, E. F., Knyazeva, S. A., & Budkevich, R. L. (2023). Exploring the role of motivation in STEM education: A systematic review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(4), Article em2250. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13086
• Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
• Bonney, K. M. (2015). Case study teaching method improves student performance and perceptions of learning gains. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 16(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v16i1.846
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Dayan, E., & Tsybulsky, D. (2024). Designing and teaching socio-scientific issues online: Digital curation in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 47(17), 2219-2238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2381133
• Garcia, T., Bridges, B., Solis, C., Linville, C., Jones, W., Tanona, S., Herington, J., & Laverty, J. T. (2024). The effect of value-focused discussions on scientists’ ethical decision making. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.06292
• Goudsouzian, L. K., & Lo, S. M. (2023). A case study on genomic imprinting facilitates student learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 47(1), 139-143. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00197.2022
• Haberbosch, M., Vick, P., Feuchter, F., & Schaal, S. (2025). Exploring molecular biology in lower secondary education: Assessing content relevance and teachers’ challenges, self-efficacy, and knowledge. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2517887
• Haskel-Ittah, M., & Yarden, A. (Eds.). (2021). Genetics education: Current challenges and possible solutions. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86051-6
• Indonesian National Qualification Framework. (2015). Kerangka kualifikasi nasional Indonesia [Indonesian national qualifications framework]. Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. https://skkni.kemnaker.go.id/tentang-kkni/penyetaraan-jenjang
• Jeong, S., Jeong, S. Y., Reeves, E., & Canan, C. (2025). Fostering equity and advocacy in a high school biology classroom: A case study approach to genetics and social justice. The Science Teacher, 92(2), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368555.2025.2450671
• Johnston, R. (2023). Is it time to remove Mendel from the school curriculum? Journal of Biological Education, 57(4), 707-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2023.2243690
• Kara, S. (2025). Evaluation of interdisciplinary science teaching practices in the context of socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2540620
• Kopcha, T. J., McGregor, J., Shin, S., Qian, Y., Choi, J., Hill, R., Mativo, J., & Choi, I. (2017). Developing an integrative STEM curriculum for robotics education through educational design research. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0005-1
• Liu, S. C. (2019). Genetically modified food for the future: Examining university students’ expressions of futures thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 41(8), 1038-1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1585995
• Lymbouridou, C. (2025). Science for ethics in SSI discussions. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-025-10258-2
• Macalalag, A. Z., Kaufmann, A., Van Meter, B., Ricketts, A., Liao, E., & Ialacci, G. (2024). Socioscientific issues: Promoting science teachers’ pedagogy on social justice. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6(1), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-024-00118-4
• Maghfiroh, H., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Susanto, H. (2024). Biology lecturers’ perceptions of genetics literacy in Indonesia: An explanatory sequential mixed methods. Journal of Biological Education, 59(1), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2024.2308302
• Maghfiroh, H., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., Susanto, H., & Chang, C.-Y. (2025). Development and validation of the genetics literacy and reasoning test: A tool for exploring global genetics issues. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 24(3), 465-487. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.465
• McEwen, B., Gericke, N., & Thörne, K. (2025). The challenge of changing a genetics deterministic teaching tradition–Teachers’ views on including epigenetics in the genetics curriculum. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00666-9
• Mohamed, M. S. (2025). Enhancing ethical reasoning in science education: A technology-driven instructional approach. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23, 2511-2535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09663-7
• Narvaez, D., & Rest, J. (1995). The four components of acting morally. In W. Kurtines, & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Moral behavior and moral development: An introduction (pp. 385-400). McGraw-Hill.
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
• Nieveen, N., & Folmer, E. (2013). Formative evaluation in educational design research. In T. Plomp, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 89-103). Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
• Park, W., & Cho, H. (2022). The interaction of history and STEM learning goals in teacher-developed curriculum materials: Opportunities and challenges for STEAM education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(3), 457-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09741-0
• Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 10-51). Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
• Puig, B., Ageitos, N., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2017). Learning gene expression through modelling and argumentation: A case study exploring the connections between the worlds of knowledge. Science & Education, 26(10), 1193-1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9943-x
• Puri, S. (2022). Effective learning through the case method. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(2), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1811133
• Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603913
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023
• Sartania, N., Sneddon, S., Boyle, J. G., McQuarrie, E., & De Koning, H. P. (2022). Increasing collaborative discussion in case-based learning improves student engagement and knowledge acquisition. Medical Science Educator, 32(5), 1055-1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01614-w
• Suwono, H., Permana, T., Saefi, M., & Fachrunnisa, R. (2023). The problem-based learning (PBL) of biology for promoting health literacy in secondary school students. Journal of Biological Education, 57(1), 230-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1884586
• Thistlethwaite, J. E., Davies, D., Ekeocha, S., Kidd, J. M., MacDougall, C., Matthews, P., Purkis, J., & Clay, D. (2012). The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 23. Medical Teacher, 34(6), e421-e444. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.680939
• Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2013). Moral motivation and the four component model. In K. Heinrichs, F. Oser, & T. Lovat (Eds.), Handbook of mMoral motivation (pp. 49-67). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-275-4_4
• Van der Leij, T., Goedhart, M., Avraamidou, L., & Wals, A. (2024). Designing a module for supporting secondary biology students’ morality through socioscientific issues in the human-nature context. Journal of Biological Education, 58(5), 1186-1203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2023.2174160
• Wan, T. (2023). Investigating student reasoning about measurement uncertainty and ability to draw conclusions from measurement data in inquiry-based university physics labs. International Journal of Science Education, 45(3), 223-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2156824
• Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2024). The effects of problem-based, project-based, and case-based learning on students’ motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3

APA

Maghfiroh, H., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., Susanto, H., & Chang, C.-Y. (2025). Integrating case study teaching and the four component model: Cultivating ethical decision in genetics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(12), em2744. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17476

Vancouver

Maghfiroh H, Zubaidah S, Mahanal S, Susanto H, Chang CY. Integrating case study teaching and the four component model: Cultivating ethical decision in genetics education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(12):em2744. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17476

AMA

Maghfiroh H, Zubaidah S, Mahanal S, Susanto H, Chang CY. Integrating case study teaching and the four component model: Cultivating ethical decision in genetics education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(12), em2744. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17476

Chicago

Maghfiroh, Hidayati, Siti Zubaidah, Susriyati Mahanal, Hendra Susanto, and Chun-Yen Chang. "Integrating case study teaching and the four component model: Cultivating ethical decision in genetics education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 12 (2025): em2744. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17476

Harvard

Maghfiroh, H., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., Susanto, H., and Chang, C.-Y. (2025). Integrating case study teaching and the four component model: Cultivating ethical decision in genetics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(12), em2744. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17476

MLA

Maghfiroh, Hidayati et al. "Integrating case study teaching and the four component model: Cultivating ethical decision in genetics education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 12, 2025, em2744. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17476