Abstract
This study examines the motivational changes of undergraduate students participating in a practical course designed to address the challenge of aligning academic training with industry needs. The study spanned two iterations of the course. During the first iteration, qualitative interviews were conducted to assess changes in student motivation throughout the practical course. In the second iteration, a motivation questionnaire was administered at three points: before, during, and after course completion. The results indicate a general decrease in student motivation during the course, followed by a partial recovery towards the end. This fluctuation highlights the need for continuous support and realistic feedback to maintain student engagement and motivation. This study contributes to the expanding body of research on how practical, industry-focused courses influence student motivation. By incorporating real-world contexts and challenges, this type of course can greatly enrich learning experiences and better prepare students for professional settings. However, one should carefully design these courses and implement effective mechanisms to maintain and foster student motivation throughout the course duration.
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Research Article
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 21, Issue 11, November 2025, Article No: em2737
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17389
Publication date: 09 Nov 2025
Article Views: 21
Article Downloads: 10
Open Access References How to cite this articleReferences
- Abdelrahman, R. M. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. Heliyon, 6(9), Article e04887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04887
- Adelakun-Adeyemo, O. (2021). The computer science final year project: A time to mentor. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(8), 500-508.
- Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect, and cognition in the interest process. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
- Aller, B. M., Lyth, D. M., & Mallak, L. A. (2008). Capstone project team formation: Mingling increases performance and motivation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 503-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2008.00188.x
- Anistyasari, Y., Sujatmiko, B., Ekohariadi, E., & Hidayati, S. C. (2024). Investigating the effect of intrinsic motivation on digital literacy skills. In Proceedings of the 5th Vocational Education International Conference (pp. 1119-1125). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-198-2_158
- Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (2003). Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 569-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00052-3
- Baldwin, J., Ebert-May, D., & Burns, D. (1999). The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for non-majors. Science Education, 83(4), 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199907)83:4<397::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-#
- Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
- Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
- Bragós, R., Aoun, L., Bermejo, S., Pegueroles, J., & Charosky, G. (2022). Analysis of students’ performance in capstone projects. In Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference (pp. 622–632). Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland, June 13-15, 2022. https://cdio.org/files/document/file/144.pdf
- Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955-970. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20249
- Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(4), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v7.i4.10
- Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485-499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20131
- Brophy, J. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00613-8
- Bruegge, B., Krusche, S., & Alperowitz, L. (2015). Software engineering project courses with industrial clients. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 15(4), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1145/2732155
- Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049-1069. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20462
- Campbell, E. A., Hynynen, J., Burger, B., & Ala-Ruona, E. (2019). Exploring the use of vibroacoustic treatment for managing chronic pain and comorbid mood disorders: A mixed-methods study. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 28(4), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/08098131.2019.1604565
- Campos-Sánchez, A., López-Núñez, J. A., Carriel, V., Martín-Piedra, M. Á., Sola, T., & Alaminos, M. (2014). Motivational component profiles in university students learning histology: A comparative study between genders and different health science curricula. BMC Medical Education, 14, Article 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-46
- Čandrlić, S., Pavlić, M., & Asenbrener Katić, M. (2020, May). Information system design and development and project-based learning. In H. C. Lane, S. Zvacek, & J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2020), Volume 1 (pp. 404-411). Scitepress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009393604040411
- Cavallo, A. M. L., Potter, W. H., & Rozman, M. (2004). Gender differences in learning con-structs, shifts in learning constructs, and their relationship to course achievement in a structured inquiry, yearlong college physics course for life science majors. School Science and Mathematics, 104(6), 288-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18246.x
- Cavallo, A. M. L., Rozman, M., Blinkenstaff, J., & Walker, N. (2003). Students’ learning approaches, reasoning abilities, motivational goals, and epistemological beliefs in differing college science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(1), 18-23.
- Chandrasekaran, S., Stojcevski, A., Littlefair, G., & Joordens, M. (2013). Project-oriented design-based learning: Aligning students’ views with industry needs. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(5), 1109-1118. https://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30056843
- Cico, O., Jaccheri, L., & Duc, A. N. (2021). Software sustainability in customer-driven courses. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Body of Knowledge for Software Sustainability (pp. 15-22). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BoKSS52540.2021.00015
- Cohen, R., Katz, I., Aelterman, N., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2022). Understanding shifts in students’ academic motivation across a school year: The role of teachers’ motivating styles and need-based experiences. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38, 963-988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00635-8
- Columb, M. O., & Atkinson, M. S. (2016). Statistical analysis: Sample size and power estimations. BJA Education, 16(5), 159-161. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaed/mkv034
- Covert, H., Ilunga Tshiswaka, D., Ramkissoon, I., Sisskin, E., Lichtveld, M., & Wickliffe, J. (2019). Assessing science motivation among high school students participating in a supplementary science programme: The Emerging Scholars Environmental Health Sciences Academy. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2508-2523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1689308
- DeLong, M., & Winter, D. (2002). Strategies for motivating students. In M. Delong (Ed.), Learning to teach and teaching to learn mathematics: Resources for professional development (pp. 159-168). Mathematical Association of America. https://doi.org/10.5948/UPO9781614443131.014
- Dev, P. C. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: What does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher? Remedial and Special Education, 18(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259701800104
- Devadoss, S., & Foltz, J. (1996). Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendance and performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(3), 499-507. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243268
- Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026125427344
- Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
- Freedman, G., Green, M. C., Kussman, M., Drusano, M., & Moore, M. M. (2023). “Dear future woman of STEM”: Letters of advice from women in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00411-0
- Gafni, R., Leiba, M., & Sherman, S. (2023). Let’s get ready for work–Employability-skills development in an IS capstone project. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 22, 235-261. https://doi.org/10.28945/5106
- Garousi, V., Giray, G., Tuzun, E., Catal, C., & Felderer, M. (2020). Closing the gap between software engineering education and industrial needs. IEEE Software, 37(2), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.2880823
- Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Re-search in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159-1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442
- Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2006). Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1088-1107. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20181
- Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2008). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267
- Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
- Hackshaw, A., & Kirkwood, A. (2011). Interpreting and reporting clinical trials with results of borderline significance. BMJ, 343, Article d3340. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3340
- Hadar, I., Sherman, S., & Hazzan, O. (2008). Learning human aspects of collaborative software development. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(3), 311-320.
- Hanna, S., Jaber, H., Almasalmeh, A., & Jaber, F. A. (2014). Reducing the gap between soft-ware-engineering curricula and software industry in Jordan. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 7(7), 602-611. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2014.77056
- Headley, M. G., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2020). Multilevel mixed methods research designs: Advancing a refined definition. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819844417
- Howard, J. L., Bureau, J. S., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300-1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789
- Hsbollah, H. M., & Hassan, H. (2022). Creating meaningful learning experiences with active, fun, and technology elements in the problem-based learning approach and its implications. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 147-181. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.6
- Jiracheewewong, E. (2022). Does higher education enhance employability skills enough for today’s graduates? STOU Education Journal, 15(2), 1-20.
- Jones, K., Leonard, L. N., & Lang, G. (2018). Desired skills for entry-level IS positions: Identification and assessment. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 58(3), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1229144
- Keller, S., Parker, C. M., & Chan, C. (2011). Employability skills: Student perceptions of an IS final-year capstone subject. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 10(2), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2011.10020004
- Kivetz, R., Urminsky, O., & Zheng, Y. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.1.39
- Kusurkar, R. A., Ten Cate, T. J., Van Asperen, M., & Croiset, G. (2011). Motivation as an independent and a dependent variable in medical education: A review of the literature. Medical Teacher, 33(5), e242-e262. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.558539
- Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013153
- LaForce, M., Noble, E., & Blackwell, C. (2017). Problem-based learning (PBL) and student interest in STEM careers: The roles of motivation and ability beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(4), Article 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040092
- Latorre, E., & Meier, E. L. (2023). Evaluating student project choice, course satisfaction, and performance between community service, internal projects, and industry-sponsored projects in a multidisciplinary capstone program. In Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ASEE. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--43426
- Lawson, A. E., Banks, D. L., & Logvin, M. (2007). Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 706-724. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20172
- Lee, J. Q., McInerney, D. M., Liem, G. A. D., & Ortiga, Y. P. (2010). The relationship between future goals and achievement-goal orientations: An intrinsic-extrinsic motivation perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 264-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.004
- Liebenberg, J., Huisman, M., & Mentz, E. (2015). Industry’s perception of the relevance of software-development education. TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 11(3), 260-284. https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v11i3.60
- López-Gazpio, I. (2021). Gaining student engagement through project-based learning: A competitive 2-D game construction case study. IEEE Access, 10, 1881-1892. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139764
- Marino, M. J. (2018). Statistical analysis in preclinical biomedical research. In M. Williams, M. J. Curtis, & K. Mullane (Eds.), Research in the biomedical sciences (pp. 107-144). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804725-5.00003-3
- Martin, A. J. (2010). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct-validation approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 765-781.
- Martin, B. A., Orr, M. K., & Ellestad, R. M. (2020, June). Impact of self-efficacy and outcome expectations on first-year engineering students’ major selection. In Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference. ASEE.
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. In Amazon (4th edition). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://www.amazon.com/Qualitative-Data-Analysis-Methods-Sourcebook/dp/150635307X
- Minor, O., & Armarego, J. (2005). Requirements engineering: A close look at industry needs and a model curricula. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 13(1), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v13i1.71
- Murphy, C., Sheth, S., & Morton, S. (2017). A two-course sequence of real projects for real customers. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 417-422). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017799
- Ormrod, J. E., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2023). Educational psychology: Developing learners (11th ed.). Pearson Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED633526
- Paasivaara, M., Vanhanen, J., & Lassenius, C. (2019, May). Collaborating with industrial customers in a capstone project course: The customers’ perspective. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (pp. 12-22). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEET.2019.00011
- Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0025
- Pembridge, J., & Paretti, M. (2010). The current state of capstone design pedagogy. In Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 15-1217). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--16141
- Rana, K. S., Bashir, A., & Pallett, R. (2024, January). An innovative approach to remodelling bioscience undergraduate final-year projects to develop key transferable skills sought by graduate employers. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1271541
- Ribeiro, E., Farias, C., & Mesquita, I. (2024). “The game changers”: How equity-driven pedagogical scaffolding reduces participation disparities in physical education. Education Sciences, 14(10), Article 1077. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101077
- Rybczynski, S. M., & Schussler, E. E. (2013). Effects of instructional model on student attitude in an introductory biology laboratory. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070222
- Salta, K., & Koulougliotis, D. (2015). Assessing motivation to learn chemistry: Adaptation and validation of the science motivation questionnaire II with Greek secondary school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00196F
- Sandelowski, M. (2013). Unmixing mixed-methods research. Research in Nursing & Health, 37(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21570
- Santos, S. C., Tedesco, P. A., Borba, M., & Brito, M. (2020). Innovative approaches in teaching programming: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 205-214). https://doi.org/10.5220/0009190502050214
- Savelsbergh, E. R., Prins, G. T., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B. E., Draijer, J. M., & Bakker, A. (2016). Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: A meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19, 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.003
- Scheff, S. W. (2016). Fundamental statistical principles for the neurobiologist: A survival guide. Academic Press.
- Serdar, C. C., Cihan, M., Yücel, D., & Serdar, M. A. (2021). Sample size, power, and effect size revisited: Simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical, and laboratory studies. Biochemia Medica, 31(1), 27-53. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.010502
- Sevinç, B., Özmen, H., & Yiğit, N. (2011). Investigation of primary students’ motivation levels towards science learning. Science Education International, 22(3), 218-232.
- Sherman, S., Kantsepolsky, B., & Roth, I. (2022). Teamwork skills: The case of a practical course. Issues in Information Systems, 23(2), 120-129.
- Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70
- Sindre, G., Giannakos, M., Krogstie, B. R., Munkvold, R., & Aalberg, T. (2018). Project-based learning in IT education: Definitions and qualities. Uniped, 41(2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1893-8981-2018-02-06
- St. Louis, A. T., Thompson, P., Sulak, T. N., Harvill, M. L., & Moore, M. E. (2021). Infusing 21st-century skill development into the undergraduate curriculum: The formation of the iBEARS network. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(2), Article e00180-21. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00180-21
- Stevens, M., & Norman, R. (2016). Industry expectations of soft skills in IT graduates: A regional survey. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference (pp. 1-9). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2843043.2843068
- Stofer, M. G. (2024). Women in STEM: The importance of mentorship and community. American Society for Microbiology. https://asm.org/Articles/2024/October/Women-STEM-Importance-Mentorship-Community
- Tenhunen, S., Männistö, T., Luukkainen, M., & Ihantola, P. (2023). A systematic literature re-view of capstone courses in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 164, Article 107191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107191
- Terrón-López, M. J., García-García, M. J., Velasco-Quintana, P. J., Ocampo, J., Vigil Montaño, M. R., & Gaya-López, M. C. (2017). Implementation of a project-based engineering school: Increasing student motivation and relevant learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 618-631. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1209462
- Thambu, N., Prayitno, H. J., & Zakaria, G. A. N. (2021). Incorporating active learning into moral education to develop multiple intelligences: A qualitative approach. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 3(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.10064
- Tuyen, L., & Tien, H. (2021). Integrating project-based learning into English for specific purposes classes at the tertiary level: Perceived challenges and benefits. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(4), 128-148. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4642
- Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667
- Young, A. M., Wendel, P. J., Esson, J. M., & Plank, K. M. (2018). Motivational decline and recovery in higher education STEM courses. International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 1016-1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1460773
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Yue, K.-B., De Silva, D., Kim, D., Aktepe, M., Nagle, S., Boerger, C., Jain, A., & Verma, S. (2009). Building real-world domain-specific social-network websites as a capstone project. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(1), 97-106.
- Zhang, G., Anderson, T. J., Ohland, M. W., & Thorndyke, B. R. (2004). Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: A longitudinal and cross-institutional study. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(4), 313-320. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00820.x
- Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. R., & Coppola, B. (2010). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1081-1094. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052207
How to cite this article
APA
Roth, I., Kantsepolsky, B., & Sherman, S. (2025). Jumping into deep waters: The impact of industry experience on student motivation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(11), em2737. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17389
Vancouver
Roth I, Kantsepolsky B, Sherman S. Jumping into deep waters: The impact of industry experience on student motivation. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(11):em2737. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17389
AMA
Roth I, Kantsepolsky B, Sherman S. Jumping into deep waters: The impact of industry experience on student motivation. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(11), em2737. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17389
Chicago
Roth, Idan, Boris Kantsepolsky, and Sofia Sherman. "Jumping into deep waters: The impact of industry experience on student motivation". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 11 (2025): em2737. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17389
Harvard
Roth, I., Kantsepolsky, B., and Sherman, S. (2025). Jumping into deep waters: The impact of industry experience on student motivation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(11), em2737. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17389
MLA
Roth, Idan et al. "Jumping into deep waters: The impact of industry experience on student motivation". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 11, 2025, em2737. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17389
Full Text (PDF)