Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alcock, L., & Davies, B. (2024). Believability in mathematical conditionals: Generating items for a conditional inference task. In S. Cook, B. Katz D. Moore-Russo (Eds), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 360-368). Omaha, NE. http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/Site/Proceedings.html
• Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2008). Doctoral students’ use of examples in evaluating and proving conjectures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9149-x
• Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2002). Definitions: Dealing with categories mathematically. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 28-34. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248389
• Ali, S., & Ara, A. (2017). Intelligence as a determinant of academic achievement: A comparative study of high achievers and underachievers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(6), 79-88.
• Attridge, N., & Inglis, M. (2013). Advanced mathematical study and the development of conditional reasoning skills. PLOS ONE, 8(7), Article e69399. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069399
• Balacheff, N. (2010). Bridging knowing and proving in mathematics: An essay from a didactical perspective. In G. Hanna, H. N. Jahnke, & H. Pulte (Eds.), Explanation and proof in mathematics: Philosophical and educational perspectives (pp. 115-135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0576-5_9
• Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its structure, growth and action. North-Holland.
• Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S193029750000067X
• Coppola, C., Mollo, M., & Pacelli, T. (2019). The worlds’ game: Collective language manipulation as a space to develop logical abilities in a primary school classroom. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(4), 783-799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0401-1
• Cormier, D., Bulut, O., McGrew, K., & Singh, D. (2017). Exploring the relations between Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and mathematics achievement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(5), 530-538. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3350
• Dawkins, P. C., & Norton, A. (2022). Identifying mental actions for abstracting the logic of conditional statements. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, Article 100954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100954
• Durand-Guerrier, V. (2003). Which notion of implication is the right one? From logical considerations to a didactic perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024661004375
• Durand-Guerrier, V. (2008). Truth versus validity in mathematical proof. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0098-8
• Durand-Guerrier, V. (2015). Reasoning, proof and proving in mathematics education. In S. Cho (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 453-457). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_39
• Durand-Guerrier, V. (2020). The logical analysis of statements. A tool for dealing with ambiguities in multilingual context. Seventh ERME Topic Conference on Language in the Mathematics Classroom.
• Durand-Guerrier, V., & Dawkins, P. C. (2018). Logic in university mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 478-481). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_100024-1
• Epp, S. S. (2003). The role of logic in teaching proof. The American Mathematical Monthly, 110(10), 886-899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2003.11920029
• Ferrari, P. L. (2004). Mathematical language and advanced mathematics learning. In M. Johnsen Høines, & A. Berit Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 383-390). Bergen University College.
• Frawley, W. J., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Matheus, C. J. (1992). Knowledge discovery in databases: An overview. AI magazine, 13(3), 57-57. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v13i3.1011
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
• García-Madruga, J. A., Orenes, I., Vila Chaves, J. Ó., & Gómez-Veiga, I. (2022). Executive functions and improvement of thinking: An intervention program to enhance deductive reasoning abilities. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 25, Articlee32. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2022.26
• Gómez-Chacón, I., García-Madruga, J. A., Vila, J. Ó., Elosúa, R., & Rodríguez, R. (2014). The dual processes hypothesis in mathematics performance: Beliefs, cognitive reflection, working memory and reasoning. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.001
• Gueudet, G., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2020). Secondary-tertiary transition in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 762-766). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100026
• Hanna, G., & de Villiers, M. (Eds.). (2012). Proof and proving in mathematics education: The 19th ICMI Study. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0073-4
• Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 805-842). Information Age Publishing.
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Ragni, M. (2025). Reasoning about possibilities: Modal logics, possible worlds, and mental models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 32, 52-79. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02518-z
• Kryjevskaia, M., Stetzer, M. R., & Grosz, N. (2014). Answer first: Applying the heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning to examine student intuitive thinking in the context of physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 10, Article 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020109
• Kyllonen, P. C., & Kell, H. J. (2017). What is fluid intelligence? Can it be improved? In M. Rosén, K. Yang Hansen, & U. Wolff (Eds.), Cognitive abilities and educational outcomes (pp. 15-37). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43473-5_2
• Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (2009). Intuitive vs. analytical thinking: Four perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 263-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9175-8
• Morsanyi, K., Busdraghi, C., & Primi, C. (2014). Mathematical anxiety is linked to reduced cognitive reflection: A potential road from discomfort in the mathematics classroom to susceptibility to biases. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 10, Article 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-10-31
• Nisbet, R., Miner, G. D., & Yale, K. (2017). Handbook of statistical analysis and data mining applications. Elsevier.
• Obeidat, F. A. A., & Saleh, S. (2022). The relationship of fluid intelligence level with higher-order thinking skills in work and energy among sixth-grade students in Jordan. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n4p224
• Otero, I., Salgado, J., & Moscoso, S. (2022). Cognitive reflection, cognitive intelligence, and cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 90, Article 101614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101614
• Passolunghi, M. C., De Blas, G. D., Carretti, B., Gomez-Veiga, I., Doz, E., & Garcia- Madruga, J. A. (2022). The role of working memory updating, inhibition, fluid intelligence, and reading comprehension in explaining differences between consistent and inconsistent arithmetic word-problem-solving performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 224, Article 105512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105512
• Peng, P., Wang, T., Wang, C., & Lin, X. (2019). A meta-analysis on the relation between fluid intelligence and reading/mathematics: Effects of tasks, age, and social economic status. Psychological Bulletin, 145(2), 189-236. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000182
• Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. Routledge Kegan and Paul.
• Planas, N., Morgan, C., & Schütte, M. (2018). Mathematics and language: Lessons and directions from two decades of research. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education: Twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 196-210). Routledge.
• Preusse, F., van der Meer, E., Deshpande, G., Krueger, F., & Wartenburger, I. (2011). Fluid intelligence allows flexible recruitment of the parieto-frontal network in analogical reasoning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00022
• Primi, R., Ferrão, M. E., & Almeida, L. S. (2010). Fluid intelligence as a predictor of learning: A longitudinal multilevel approach applied to math. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 446-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.001
• Radford, L. (2002). The seen, the spoken and the written: A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22(2), 14-23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248387
• Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1995). Coloured progressive matrices. Oxford.
• Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.002
• Rubio-Sánchez, A., Gómez-Chacón, I. M., & Gómez Veiga, I. (2023). Geometrical reasoning and the influence of fluid intelligence over geometrical competence. In P. Drijvers, C. Csapodi, H. Palmér, K. Gosztonyi, & E. Kónya (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME13) (pp. 197-205). Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics and ERME. https://hal.science/hal-04419360
• Selden, J., & Selden, A. (1995) Unpacking the logic of mathematical statements. Educational Studies in Mathematics 29, 123-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01274210
• Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 13-57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014097416157
• Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 289-321. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30034869
• Stylianou, D. A., Blanton, M. L., & Rotou, O. (2015). Undergraduate students’ understanding of proof: Relationships between proof conceptions, beliefs, and classroom experiences with learning proof. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(1), 91-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0003-0
• Thomas, M., de Freitas Druck, I., Huillet, D., Ju, M.-K., Nardi, E., Rasmussen, C., & Xie, J. (2012). Key mathematical concepts in the transition from secondary to university. In Pre-proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (ICME-12) Survey Team 4 (pp. 90-136). COEX. http://www.math.auckland.ac.nz/~thomas/ST4.pdf
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1275-1289. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
• Wood, L. (2001). The ssecondary-tertiary interface. In D. Holton, M. Artigue, U. Kirchgräber, J. Hillel, M. Niss, & A. Schoenfeld (Eds), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level. New ICMI Study Series (Vol. 7.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_9

APA

Dolz, A., Gómez-Chacón, I. M., & García Fernández, C. (2026). Mathematics performance and the relations to the cognitive reflection, fluid intelligence, conditional reasoning, and logical-mathematical language in the university students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(1), em2757. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17631

Vancouver

Dolz A, Gómez-Chacón IM, García Fernández C. Mathematics performance and the relations to the cognitive reflection, fluid intelligence, conditional reasoning, and logical-mathematical language in the university students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(1):em2757. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17631

AMA

Dolz A, Gómez-Chacón IM, García Fernández C. Mathematics performance and the relations to the cognitive reflection, fluid intelligence, conditional reasoning, and logical-mathematical language in the university students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(1), em2757. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17631

Chicago

Dolz, Aránzazu, Inés M. Gómez-Chacón, and Carlos García Fernández. "Mathematics performance and the relations to the cognitive reflection, fluid intelligence, conditional reasoning, and logical-mathematical language in the university students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 1 (2026): em2757. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17631

Harvard

Dolz, A., Gómez-Chacón, I. M., and García Fernández, C. (2026). Mathematics performance and the relations to the cognitive reflection, fluid intelligence, conditional reasoning, and logical-mathematical language in the university students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(1), em2757. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17631

MLA

Dolz, Aránzazu et al. "Mathematics performance and the relations to the cognitive reflection, fluid intelligence, conditional reasoning, and logical-mathematical language in the university students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 1, 2026, em2757. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17631