Middle School Students’ Motivation for Learning Technology in South Korea

Hyuksoo Kwon

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1253a

Full Text (PDF)

Hyuksoo Kwon ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Department of Technology and Home-Economics Education, Kongju National University Gongju, Republic of Korea
^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aims to develop a feasible instrument for determining middle school students’ motivation to learn technology in South Korea. The authors translated Glynn’s motivational instrument and modified it to measure Korean middle school students’ motivation to learn technology. The instrument was applied to 441 students of grade 8 and 9 from six different middle schools in metropolitan cities in South Korea. We conducted both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to validate the modified instrument. In addition, we investigated motivational differences by gender and career pursuit using an independent t-test and identified factors affecting preference for technology subject. In terms of the results, first, we identified five sub-factors governing the motivation to learn technology. Second, we confirmed three factors that affect the preference for technology subjects, namely, intrinsic motivation, career motivation, and teacher preference. This study provides meaningful insights for technology educators into teaching and learning strategies to consider diverse motivational factors and students’ gender and career pursuit.

Keywords

motivation
factor analysis
technology education
Republic of Korea

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1253a

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2016 - Volume 12 Issue 4, pp. 1033-1046

Publication date: 29 Jun 2016

Article Views: 1429

Article Downloads: 1067

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Atkinson, E. S. (1999). Key factors influencing pupil motivation in design and technology. Journal of Technology Education, 10(2), 4-26.
Autio, O., Hietanoro, J., & Ruismäki, H. (2011). Taking part in technology education: Elements in students’ motivation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(3), 349-361. doi: 10.1007/s10798-010-9124-6
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. NY:Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bandura, A. (2006). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S. I. Donaldson, D. E. Berger, & K. Pezdek (Eds.), The rise of applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers. NJ: Erlbaum.
Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955-970. doi: 10.1002/tea.20249
Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational psychologist, 18(3), 200- 215. doi:10.1080/00461528309529274
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). NJ: Erlbaum.
Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049-1065. doi:10.1002/sce.20462
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge.
Campbell, C., & Jane, B. (2012). Motivating children to learn: the role of technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(1), 1-11. doi:10.1007/s10798-010-9134-4
Cavallo, A. M., Rozman, M., Blinkenstaff, J., & Walker, N. (2003). Students’ learning approaches, reasoning abilities, motivational goals, and epistemological beliefs in differing college science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33(3), 18-23.
Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270-295. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1094
Chae, Y., & Gentry, M. (2011). Gifted and general high school students’ perceptions of learning and motivational constructs in Korea and the United States. High Ability Studies, 22(1), 103-118. doi:10.1080/13598139.2011.577275
Chatoney, M., & Andreucci, C. (2009). How study aids influence learning and motivation for girls in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(4), 393-402. doi: 10.1007/s10798-009-9094-8
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual review of psychology, 53(1), 109-132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Gilman, R., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivation and its relevance to school psychology: An introduction to special issue. Journal on School Psychology, 44(5), 325–329. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.006
Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159-1176. doi:10.1002/tea.20442
Glynn, S. M., & Koballa, T. R. Jr. (2006). Motivation to learn in college science. In J.J. Mintzes & W.H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 25–32). Arlington, VA:National Science Teachers Association Press.
Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2007). Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1088- 1107. doi:10.1002/tea.20181
Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127-146. doi:10.1002/tea.20267
Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC Test Translation and Adaptation Guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 164-172.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
Ihm, C. (2007). Recent trends and issues facing South Korean education. Retrieved 15 March 2015, from http://therealsouthkorea.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/his-articlepresents-recent-trends-and-issues-facing-south-korean-education/
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd.). NY: Guildford Press.
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2001). Demand for education and developmental state: Private tutoring in South Korea. Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. Retrieved 8 March 2015, from http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf ?abstract_id=268284
Koballa T. R. Jr. & Glynn S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science education, in Abell S. K. & Lederman N. (ed.), Handbook for Research in Science Education, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kwon, H., & Chang, M. (2009). Technology teachers’ beliefs about biotechnology and its instruction in South Korea. Journal of Technology, 35(1), 67-75.
Lawanto, O., & Stewardson, G. (2009). Engineering Design Activity: Understanding How Different Design Activities Influence Students' Motivation in Grades 9-12. Final Report. A Seed Grant Research Project. Research in Engineering and Technology Education. National Center for Engineering and Technology Education.
Mammes, I. (2004). Promoting girls' interest in technology through technology education: A research study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(2), 89- 100. doi: 10.1023/B:ITDE.0000026472
McCarthy, R. (2009). Beyond smash and crash: Gender-friendly tech ed. The Technology Teacher, 69(2), 16-21.
McSpadden, M., & Kelley, T. R. (2012). Engineering Design: Diverse Design Teams to Solve Real-World Problems. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 72(1), 17-21.
Mitts, C. R. (2008). Gender Preferences in Technology Student Association Competitions. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 80-93.
National Curriculum Information Center. (2015). Permalink National Curriculum of Korea. Retrieved August 30, 2015, from http://ncic.go.kr/english.index.do
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of educational Psychology, 95(4), 667. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
Pintrich, P. R., & Maehr, M. L. (2002). Advances in motivation and achievement: New directions in measures and methods. Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rasinen, A., Virtanen, S., Endepohls-Ulpe, M., Ikonen, P., Ebach, J., & Stahl-von Zabern, J. (2009). Technology education for children in primary schools in Finland and Germany: different school systems, similar problems and how to overcome them. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(4), 367-379. doi:10.1007/s10798-009- 9097-5
Rezabek, R. (1995). The relationships among measures of intrinsic motivation, instructional design, and learning in computer-based instruction. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 383 332).
Salta, K., & Koulougliotis, D. (2015). Assessing motivation to learn chemistry: adaptation and validation of Science Motivation Questionnaire II with Greek secondary school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 237-250. doi:10.1039/C4RP00196F
Sanders, M. (2001). New paradigm or old wine? The status of technology education practice in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 12(2), 35-55.
Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). NJ: Erlbaum.
Seog, M., Hendricks, K. S., & González-Moreno, P. A. (2011). Students’ motivation to study music: The South Korean context. Research Studies in Music Education, 33(1), 89-104. doi:10.1177/1321103X11400514
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158-176. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860
Sumathipala, A., & Murray, J. (2000). New approach to translating instruments for cross‐ cultural research: a combined qualitative and quantitative approach for translation and consensus generation. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 9(2), 87- 95. doi:10.1002/mpr.83
Taasoobshirazi, G., & Carr, M. (2009). A structural equation model of expertise in college physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 630. doi:10.1037/a0014557
Tosun, C. (2013). Adaptation of Chemistry Motivation Questionnaire-II to Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study. Journal of Education Faculty, 15(1), 173-202.
Wollam, J. (1992). Equality versus excellence—The South Korean dilemma in gifted education. Roeper Review, 14(4), 212-217. doi:10.1080/02783199209553433
Zeyer, A., Çetin‐Dindar, A., Md Zain, A. N., Juriševič, M., Devetak, I., & Odermatt, F. (2013). Systemizing: A cross‐cultural constant for motivation to learn science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(9), 1047-1067. doi:10.1002/tea.21101

How to cite this article

APA

Kwon, H. (2016). Middle School Students’ Motivation for Learning Technology in South Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 1033-1046. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1253a

Vancouver

Kwon H. Middle School Students’ Motivation for Learning Technology in South Korea. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(4):1033-46. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1253a

AMA

Kwon H. Middle School Students’ Motivation for Learning Technology in South Korea. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(4), 1033-1046. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1253a

Chicago

Kwon, Hyuksoo. "Middle School Students’ Motivation for Learning Technology in South Korea". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 4 (2016): 1033-1046. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1253a

Harvard

Kwon, H. (2016). Middle School Students’ Motivation for Learning Technology in South Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), pp. 1033-1046. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1253a

MLA

Kwon, Hyuksoo "Middle School Students’ Motivation for Learning Technology in South Korea". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 4, 2016, pp. 1033-1046. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1253a