Processing Academic Science Reading Texts through Context Effects: Evidence from Eye Movements

Soh Or-Kan

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00642a

Full Text (PDF)

Soh Or-Kan ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ School of Language Studies & Linguistics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, MALAYSIA
^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aimed at examining context effects of processing science terminology in Chinese during reading process. The science texts were first chosen, and then they were replaced by science terminology with familiar words; other common words remained in both texts. The results implied that readers spent longer rereading durations and total fixation durations for the same common words in science texts than for corresponding texts. Readers performed shorter gaze durations for replaced words than the science terminology. However, the first fixation durations for the two-word types did not show significant differences from each other. Besides, readers sought for more contextual information to aid their comprehension. The adult readers seemed to successfully process the meanings of each Chinese characters but they failed to access the meanings of science terminology at the initial processing stage. With the assistance of contextual information, the adult readers were able to comprehend the unfamiliar words. Instruction for teaching science in school was suggested to improve the learning processes.

Keywords

classroom instruction
academic science reading texts context effects
eye movements
science terminology
context effects

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00642a

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2017 - Volume 13 Issue 3, pp. 771-790

Publication date: 12 Dec 2016

Article Views: 1276

Article Downloads: 729

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Alkan, S., & Cagiltay, K. (2007). Studying computer game learning experience through eye tracking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 538-542.
Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2010). Identifying Students' Interests in Biology Using a Decade of Self-Generated Questions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 63-75.
Bruninghan, S. M., & Folk, J. R. (2012). Combining contextual and morphemic cue is beneficial during incidental vocabulary acquisition: Semantic transparency in novel compound word processing. Reading Research Quarterly, doi:10.1002/RRQ.015
Canham, M., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, 155–166.
Carlisle, J. F., Fleming, J. E., & Gudbrandsen, B. (2000). Incidental word learning in science classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(2), 184-211.
Chaffin, R., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2001). Learning new word meanings from context: a study of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 225.
Chen, M., & Ko, H. (2011). Exploring the eye‐movement patterns as Chinese children read texts: a developmental perspective. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(2), 232-246.
Chen, M. L., Wang, H. C., & Ko, H. W. (2009). The construction and validation of Chinese 28 Semantic Space by using Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of Chinese Psychology, 51(4), 415-435.
Foster, T. E., Ardoin, S. P., & Binder, K. S. (2013). Underlying changes in repeated reading: An eye movement study. School Psychology Review, 42(2), 140.
Garrod, S., O'Brien, E. J., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1990). Elaborative inferencing as an active or passive process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(2), 250.
Hegarty, M. & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of memory and language, 32(6), 717–742.
Hoosain, R. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. Advances in psychology, 90, 111-130.
Hyönä, J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 172-176.
Hyönä, J., Lorch Jr, R. F., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 44.
Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 313–334). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hyönä, J., & Nurminen, A.-M. (2006). Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 31–50. doi:10.1348/000712605x53678
Inhoff, A. W., & Wu, C. (2005). Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading. Memory & cognition, 33(8), 1345-1356.
Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & van Gog, T. (2010). In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction, 20, 146–154.
Jian, Y. C., Chen, M. L., & Ko, H. W. (2013). Context Effects in Processing of Chinese Academic Words: An Eye‐Tracking Investigation. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 403-413.
Jian, Y. -C., & Ko, H. -W. (2012). Investigating the effects of background knowledge on Chinese word processing during text reading: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(S1), S71-S86.
Kim, Y. H., & Goetz, E. T. (1994). Context effects on word recognition and reading comprehension of poor and good readers: A test of the interactive-compensatory hypothesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 179-188.
Ko, H. W., & Chan, E. L. (2006). Elementary School Reading Comprehension Screening Test (Grade 2 to 6). Taipei: Special Education Unit, Ministry of Education.
Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learn Instr, 13(2), 205–226.
Lai, M. L., & Chen, Y. H. (2012). Examining preschoolers’ attention during storybook reading: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Early Children & Care, 8, 81-96.
Lai, M. L., Tsai, M.-J., Yang, F.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Liu, T. C., Lee, S. W. Y., et al. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90–115.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological review, 104(2), 211.
Li, X., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location? Vision Research, 51(10), 1146-1156.
Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525-552.
Mason, L., Pluchino, P., Tornatora, M. C., & Ariasi, N. (2013). An eye-tracking study of learning from science text with concrete and abstract illustrations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81(3), 356-384.
Mayer, R. E. (2010). Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and instruction, 20(2), 167-171.
Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American educational research journal, 24(2), 237-270.
Packard, J. L. (2000). The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
Patrick MD, Carter G, Wiebe EN (2005) Visual representations of DNA replication: middle grades students’ perceptions and interpretations. Journal of Science Educational Technology, 14(3), 353– 365.
Perfetti, C. A., Goldman, S. R., & Hogaboam, T. W. (1979). Reading skill and the identification of words in discourse context. Memory & Cognition, 7(4), 273-282.
Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1977). Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.). Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 141-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rahman, T., & Bisanz, G. L. (1986). Reading ability and use of a story schema in recalling and reconstructing information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(5), 323.
Ramsey, S. R. (1987). The languages of China. Princeton University Press.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372.
Rayner, K., & Juhasz, B. (2004). Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 340-352.
Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191-201.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1981). Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 33(4), 351-373.
Schwantes, F. (1982). Text readability level and development differences in context effects. Journal of Literacy Research, 14(1), 5-12.
She, H. C., & Chen, Y. Z. (2009). The impact of multimedia effect on science learning: Evidence from eye movements. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1297-1307.
Shen, D., Liversedge, S. P., Tian, J., Zang, C., Cui, L., Bai, X., et al. (2012). Eye movements of second language learners when reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, doi:10.1037a0027485
Soh, O. K. (2016). Examining the reading behaviours and performances of sixth-graders for reading instruction: evidence from eye movements. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(4).
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Towards an interactive compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32-71. doi:10.2307/747348
Stanovich, K. E. (1984). The Interactive-Compensatory Model of Reading A Confluence of Developmental, Experimental, and Educational Psychology. Remedial and special education, 5(3), 11-19.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1981). The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition. Tests of a two-process theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(3), 658-672. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.7.3.658
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Feeman, D. J. (1981). A longitudinal study of sentence context effects in second-grade children: Tests of an interactive-compensatory model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32(2), 185-199.
Schnotz W, Kulhavy RW (eds) (1994) Comprehension of graphics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Tai, R. H., Loehr, J. F., & Brigham, F. J. (2006). An exploration of the use of eye‐gaze tracking to study problem‐solving on standardized science assessments. International journal of research & method in education, 29(2), 185-208.
Tsai, M.-J., Hou, H. T., Lai, M. L., Liu, W.-Y., & Yang, F. Y. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiplechoice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 58(1), 375–385.
Van Gog, T., & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 95–99.
van Sommeren M, Reimann P, Boshuizen H, de Jong TD (eds) (1998) Learning with multiple representations. Permagon, Amsterdam.
West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E., Feeman, D. J., & Cunningham, A. E. (1983). The effect of sentence context on word recognition in second-and sixth-grade children. Reading Research Quarterly, 6-15.
Williams, R., & Morris, R. (2004). Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 312-339.
Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 705-725.
Yang, F. Y., Chang, C. Y., Chien, W. R., Chien, Y. T., & Tseng, Y. H. (2013). Tracking learners' visual attention during a multimedia presentation in a real classroom. Computers & Education, 62, 208- 2201.

How to cite this article

APA

Or-Kan, S. (2017). Processing Academic Science Reading Texts through Context Effects: Evidence from Eye Movements. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 771-790. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00642a

Vancouver

Or-Kan S. Processing Academic Science Reading Texts through Context Effects: Evidence from Eye Movements. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(3):771-90. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00642a

AMA

Or-Kan S. Processing Academic Science Reading Texts through Context Effects: Evidence from Eye Movements. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(3), 771-790. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00642a

Chicago

Or-Kan, Soh. "Processing Academic Science Reading Texts through Context Effects: Evidence from Eye Movements". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 3 (2017): 771-790. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00642a

Harvard

Or-Kan, S. (2017). Processing Academic Science Reading Texts through Context Effects: Evidence from Eye Movements. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), pp. 771-790. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00642a

MLA

Or-Kan, Soh "Processing Academic Science Reading Texts through Context Effects: Evidence from Eye Movements". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 3, 2017, pp. 771-790. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00642a