• Aldahmash, A. H., Alshamrani, S. M., Alshaya, F. S., & Alsarrani, N. A. (2019). Research Trends in İn-Service Science Teacher Professional Development from 2012 to 2016. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12211a
• Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and teacher education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
• Blank, R. K., & de las Alas, N. (2009). The effects of teacher professional development on gains in student achievement: How meta-analysis provides scientific evidence useful to education leaders. Council of Chief State School Officers. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED544700.pdf
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discourse in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
• Borko, H., Koellner, K. A., Jacobs, J. K., Roberts, S. A., Baldinger, E., & Risley, R. (2010). Preparing instructional leaders to facilitate mathematics professional development [Paper presentation]. AERA conference 2010, Denver.
• Boylan, M., Coldwell, M., Maxwell, B., & Jordan, J. (2018). Rethinking models of professional learning as tools: a conceptual analysis to inform research and practice. Professional Development in Education, 44(1), 120-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1306789
• Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & Lepage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1-39). Jossey-Bass.
• Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Office of Science Education National Institutes of Health. https://media.bscs.org/bscsmw/5es/bscs_5e_full_report.pdf
• Carpendale, J., Berry, A., Cooper, R., & Mitchell, I. (2021). Balancing fidelity with agency: understanding the professional development of highly accomplished teachers. Professional Development in Education, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1972436
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
• Cordingly, P., Higgins, S., Greany, T., Buckler, N., Coles-Jordan, D., Crisp, B., Saunders, L., & Coe, R. (2015). Developing great teaching: Lessons from the international reviews into effective professional development. Teacher Development Trust. https://dro.dur.ac.uk/15834/1/15834.pdf
• Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 383-412. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003383
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. National Staff Development Council. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.180.6634&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. Falmer Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203021316
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
• Fogleman, J., McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Examining the effect of teachers’ adaptations of a middle school science inquiry-oriented curriculum unit on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20399
• Frechtling, J. A., Sharp, L., Carey, N., & Vaden-Kiernan, N. (1995). Teacher enhancement programs: A perspective on the last four decades. National Science Foundation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources. National Science Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED407246.pdf
• Fullan, M. (2008). Curriculum implementation and sustainability. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He, & J. Phillon (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 113-122). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976572.n6
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
• Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9102-y
• Granger, E. M., Bevis, T. H., Southerland, S. A., Saka, Y., & Ke, F. (2019). Examining features of how professional development and enactment of educative curricula influences elementary science teacher learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(3), 348-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21480
• Grossman, P. (1995). Teachers’ knowledge. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 20-24). Elsevier Science Ltd.
• Guskey, T. R. (1999). Apply time with wisdom. Journal of Staff Development, 20, 10-15.
• Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 748-750. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308401007
• Guskey, T. R., Yoon K. S. (2009). What works in professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000709
• Hill, H. C., & Erickson, A. (2019). Using implementation fidelity to aid in interpreting program impacts: A brief review. Educational Researcher, 48(9), 590-598. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19891436
• Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes and efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 1-28. https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://xs.hkvisa.net/&httpsredir=1&article=1000&context=professional_dev
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Allyn & Bacon.
• Kane, T. J., McCaffrey, D. F., Miller, T., & Staiger, D. O. (2013). Have we identified effective teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment. MET Project Research Paper. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED540959.pdf
• Keisler, G. (2017). Leading a learning community. In K. Smith, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Quality learning: teachers changing their practice (pp. 3-8). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-914-0_14
• Kennedy, M. (1998). Form and substance of inservice teacher education (Research Monograph No. 13). National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
• Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945-980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
• Kowalski, S. M., Taylor, J. A., Askinas, K. M., Wang, Q., Zhang, Q., Maddix, W. P., & Tipton, E. (2020). Examining Factors Contributing to Variation in Effect Size Estimates of Teacher Outcomes from Studies of Science Teacher Professional Development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(3), 430-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1726538
• Lerman, S. (1989). Constructivism, mathematics and mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(2), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00579463
• Li, N., Zhou, G. X., Huang, X., & Liu, E. S. (2018). A focus on the current situation and development trend of empirical studies on science education in China: Take the theme of conceptual change as an example. Studies on Science Popularization, 13(6), 5-12. (in Chinese). https://10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2018.06.001
• Lin, J. W., Yen, M. H., Liang, J. C., Chiu, M. H., & Guo, C. J. (2016). Examining the factors that influence students’ science learning processes and their learning outcomes: 30 years of conceptual change research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(9), 2617-2646. https://10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin Press.
• Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programs in science. In II S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267
• McChesney, K. & Aldridge, J. M. (2019). What gets in the way? A new conceptual model for the trajectory from teacher professional development to impact. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 834-852. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1667412
• Osborne, R., Wittrock, M. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education. Studies in Science Education, 12(1), 59-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268508559923
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227. http://www.ud.infn.it/URDF/laurea/idifo1/materiali/g5/Posner%20et%20al.pdf
• Pringle, R. M., Mesa, J., & Hayes, L. (2020). Meeting the demands of science reforms: A comprehensive professional development for practicing middle school teachers. Research in Science Education, 50(2), 709-737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s22265-018-9708-9
• Santrock, J. W. (2006). Educational psychology classroom update: Preparing for Praxis and practice (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Companies.
• Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 115-163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
• Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kwanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. National Center for Education Statistics. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED431621.pdf
• Telese, J. A. (2008). Teacher professional development in mathematics and student achievement: A NAEP 2005 [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the School Science and Mathematics Association, Raleigh, NC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503261.pdf
• Treagust, R. D. D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
• van Driel, J. H., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & Zwart, R. C. (2012). Current trends and missing links in studies on teacher professional development in science education: A review of design features and quality of research. Studies in Science Education, 48(2), 129-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.738020
• Vosniadou, S. (2003). Exploring the relationships between conceptual change and intentional learning. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 377-406). Erlbaum.
• White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1989). Metalearning and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 577-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110509
• Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340(6130), 310-313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230725
• Wittrock, M. C. (1974). A generative model of mathematics learning. Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 181-196. https://www.jstor.org/stable/748845
• Yang, Y., Liu, X., & Gardella, J. A. (2020). Effects of a professional development program on science teacher knowledge and practice, and student understanding of interdisciplinary science concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1028-1057. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21620
• Yin, R. K. (2006). Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Research in the Schools, 13(1), 41-47. https://www.proquest.com/docview/211166300/fulltextPDF/1FDC70ADB4514FAFPQ/1?accountid=8554

APA

Li, N., Liu, E., Liu, C., & Guo, S. (2021). Rethinking the Factor of Duration for Professional Development: A Workshop-Seminar-Demonstration Class Model for Science Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2043. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11351

Vancouver

Li N, Liu E, Liu C, Guo S. Rethinking the Factor of Duration for Professional Development: A Workshop-Seminar-Demonstration Class Model for Science Teachers. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(12):em2043. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11351

AMA

Li N, Liu E, Liu C, Guo S. Rethinking the Factor of Duration for Professional Development: A Workshop-Seminar-Demonstration Class Model for Science Teachers. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(12), em2043. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11351

Chicago

Li, Nuo, Enshan Liu, Cheng Liu, and Shuchen Guo. "Rethinking the Factor of Duration for Professional Development: A Workshop-Seminar-Demonstration Class Model for Science Teachers". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 12 (2021): em2043. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11351

Harvard

Li, N., Liu, E., Liu, C., and Guo, S. (2021). Rethinking the Factor of Duration for Professional Development: A Workshop-Seminar-Demonstration Class Model for Science Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2043. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11351

MLA

Li, Nuo et al. "Rethinking the Factor of Duration for Professional Development: A Workshop-Seminar-Demonstration Class Model for Science Teachers". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 12, 2021, em2043. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11351