A Systematic Review Describing Contextual Teaching Challenges Associated With Inquiry-Based Practical Work in Natural Sciences Education

Fru Vitalis Akuma; Estelle Gaigher

doi:10.29333/ejmste/11352

Full Text (PDF)

Fru Vitalis Akuma ¹ ^* , Estelle Gaigher ¹

More Detail

¹ Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Faculty of Education, Groenkloof Campus, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, SOUTH AFRICA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

There are many challenges associated with Inquiry-Based Practical Work (IBPW), scattered in the school and post-school natural sciences education research literature. The goal of the systematic review presented in this paper, was to gather the contextual teaching challenges in the said literature, and then to create a detailed multi-perspective description of these challenges. The result shows that, the challenges occur mostly in the northern hemisphere, the highest proportion is in the Upper- and Post-secondary education levels, and more than half of the challenges are in integrated natural sciences education settings. In addition, the challenges are deeply divided between the school- and system-levels of the education framework, with the emergence of seven categories that have not been reported before. While significantly increasing knowledge, the results can be used when supporting teachers implementing IBPW. This is in addition to informing future research, around teacher support and the further unravelling of the challenges.

Keywords

contextual teaching challenges
multi-perspective description
inquiry-based practical work
systematic review
school and post-school natural sciences education

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Review Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 17, Issue 12, December 2021, Article No: em2044

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11352

Publication date: 18 Nov 2021

Article Views: 4285

Article Downloads: 2335

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118
Abelha, M., Fernandes, S., Mesquita, D., Seabra, F., & Ferreira-Oliveira, A. T. (2020). Graduate employability and competence development in higher education—a systematic literature review using PRISMA. Sustainability, 12(15), 5900. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155900
Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogic content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405-1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187041
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
Abrahams, I., & Reis, M. J. (2012). Practical work: Its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 1035-1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21036
Abrams, E., Southerland, S. A., & Evans, C. A. (2007). Inquiry in the classroom: Necessary components of a useful definition. In E. Abrams, S. A. Southerland, & P. Silva (Eds.), Inquiry in the science classroom: Realities and opportunities. Information Age Publishing.
Afra, N. C., Osta, I., & Zoubeir, W. (2009). Students’ alternative conceptions about electricity and effect of inquiry-based teaching strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 103-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9106-7
Aksela, M., & Boström, M. (2012). Supporting students’ interest through inquiry-based learning in the context of fuel cells. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 2(3), 53-61.
Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2018). A systematic review characterising and clarifying intrinsic teaching challenges linked to inquiry-based practical work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 619-648. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21516
Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019). Characterising extrinsic challenges linked to the design and implementation of inquiry-based practical work. Research in Science Education, 49(6), 1677-1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9671-x
Alexakos, K. (2010). Teaching the practice of science, unteaching the “scientific method”. Science Scope, 33(9), 74-79.
Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In K. S. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807-830). Routledge.
Baker, W. P., Lang, M., & Lawson, A. E. (2002). Classroom management for successful student inquiry. The Clearing House 75(5), 248-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650209603949
Bartos, S. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2014). Teachers’ knowledge structures for nature of science and scientific inquiry: Conceptions and classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1150-1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21168
Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802582241
Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94, 577-616. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20390
Boldrini, E., Sappa, V., & Aprea, C. (2019). Which difficulties and resources do vocational teachers perceive? An exploratory study setting the stage for investigating teachers’ resilience in Switzerland. Teachers and Teaching, 25(1), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1520086
Bowen, R. S., Picard, D. R., Verberne-Sutton, S., & Brame, C. J. (2018). Incorporating student design in an HPLC lab activity promotes student metacognition and argumentation. Journal of Chemical Education, 95, 108-115. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00258
Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 20-46). American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Capobianco, B., & Thiel, E. A. (2006). Are you UV safe? Science and Children, 44(1), 26-31.
Carlin, J. L. (2010). An investigative alternative to single-species dissection in the introductory biology laboratory. Bioscene, 36(2), 28-33.
Chairam, S., Klahan, N., & Coll, R. (2015). Exploring secondary students’ understanding of chemical kinetics through inquiry-based learning activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 937-956. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1365a
Childs, A., Tenzin, W., Johnson, D., & Ramachandran, K. (2012). Science education in Bhutan: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.626461
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
Corlu, M. A., & Aydin, E. (2016). Evaluation of learning gains through integrated STEM projects. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.35021
Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (1999). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. Crabtree & W. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 163-177). Sage.
Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20157
Crawford, B. A. (2016). Supporting teachers in inquiry/science practices, modeling, and complex reasoning in science classrooms [Paper presentation]. Southern Africa Association of Maths, Science, and Technology Education Annual Conference, South Africa, Pretoria.
Dai, D. Y., Gerbino, K. A., & Daley, M. J. (2011). Inquiry-based learning in China: Do teachers practice what they preach, and why? Frontiers of Education in China, 6(1), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-011-0125-3
Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement Grades 10-12 Physical sciences. Government Printing Works.
Di Biase, R. (2019). Moving beyond the teacher-centred/learner-centred dichotomy: implementing a structured model of active learning in the Maldives. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 49(4), 565-583.
Di Fuccia, D., Witteck, T., Markic, S., & Eilks, I. (2012). Trends in practical work in German science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.817a
Duangpummet, P., Chaiyen, P., & Chenprakhon, P. (2019). Lipase-catalyzed esterification: An inquiry-based laboratory activity to promote high school students’ understanding and positive perceptions of green chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 96, 1205−1211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00855
Dudu, W. T., & Vhurumuku, E. (2012). Teachers’ practices of inquiry when teaching investigations: A case study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3, 579-600.
Ebenezer, J., Kaya, O. N., & Ebenezer, D. L. (2011). Engaging students in environmental research projects: Perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 94-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20387
Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.g73266758j348t33
Ergazaki, M., & Zogza, V. (2013). How does the model of inquiry-based science education work in the kindergarten: The case of biology. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 7(2), 73-97.
ET 2020 Working Group on Schools. (2018). Teachers and school leaders in schools as learning organisations. European Commission. https://connections.etf.europa.eu/files/form/anonymous/api/library/44b84057-e0b1-47f6-92cc-0e58d0b305ce/document/36b6a4bd-89f0-4ba9-9af3-bdd464812cc9/media/WGS-int-rep-Teachers-and-school-leaders-Sep-2017.pdf
Gengarelly, L. M., & Abrams, E. D. (2009). Closing the gap: Inquiry in research and the secondary science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9134-2
Harris, C. J., & Rooks, D. L. (2010). Managing inquiry-based science: Challenges in enacting complex science instruction in elementary and middle school classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9172-5
Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952-984. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20439
Heradio, R., Chacon, J., Vargas, H., Galan, D., Saenz, J., De La Torre, L., & Dormido, S. (2018). Open-source hardware in education: A systematic mapping study. IEEE Access, 6, 72094-72103. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2881929
Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry. School Review, 79, 171-212. https://doi.org/10.1086/442968
Higgins. (2009). ISTA questionnaire on junior certificate science. Science, 45(1), 17-19.
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Huziak-Clark, T., Van Hook, S. J., Nurnberger-Haag, J., & Ballone-Duran, L. (2007). Using inquiry to improve pedagogy through K-12/university partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 107(8), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2007.tb17796.x
Jackson, D. K., & Boboc, M. (2008). Facilitating an inquiry-based science classroom. Science Scope, 31(5), 64-67.
Jagodziński, P., & Wolski, R. (2015). Assessment of application technology of natural user interfaces in the creation of a virtual chemical laboratory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9517-5
Jones, A. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to uptake of ICT by teachers. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. www.becta.org.uk
Jordan, R. C., Ruibal-Villasenor, M., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Etkina, E. (2011). Laboratory materials: Affordances or constraints? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 1010-1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20418
Kapanadze, M., & Eilks, I. (2014). Supporting reform in science education in central and eastern Europe - Reflections and perspectives from the project TEMPUS-SALiS. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1016a
Keen-Rocha, L. (2005). To tan or not to tan? Science Teacher, 72(6), 46-50.
Kennedy, D. (2013). The role of investigations in promoting inquiry-based science education in Ireland. Science Education International, 24(3), 282-305.
Khan, S. (2011). New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(3), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9247-2
Kidman, G. (2012). Australia at the crossroads: A review of school science practical work. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.815a
Kim, M., & Tan, A. l. (2010). Rethinking difficulties of teaching inquiry‐based practical work: Stories from elementary pre‐service teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(4), 465-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003639913
Kind, P. M., Kind, V., Hofstein, A., & Wilson, J. (2011). Peer argumentation in the school science laboratory: Exploring effects of task features. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2527-2558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.550952
Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. MIT Press.
Kriek, J., & Grayson, D. (2009). A holistic professional development model for South African physical science teachers. South African Journal of Education, 29, 185-203. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v29n2a123
Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). Connecting scientific reasoning and causal inference. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5(2), 261-288. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327647jcd0502_5
Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2005). Is developing scientific thinking all about learning to control variables? Psychological Science, 16(11), 866-870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01628.x
Lavonen, J., & Laaksonen, S. (2009). Context of teaching and learning school science in Finland: Reflections on PISA 2006 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 922-944. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20339
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2012). Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry: Instructional capacity through professional development. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 335-359). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_24
Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and contexts for contemporary teaching. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 249-264). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_16
Maeng, J., & Bell, R. (2013). Theories, laws, and hypotheses. The Science Teacher, 80(7), 38-43. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1460567414?fromopenview=true&pq-origsite=gscholar
Makoelle, T. M. (2012). The state of inclusive pedagogy in South Africa: A literature review. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 3(2), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09766634.2012.11885569
Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 854-870. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<854::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-5
Martin, J. P., Choe, N. H., Halter, J., Foster, M., Froyd, J., Borrego, M., & Winterer, E. R. (2019). Interventions supporting baccalaureate achievement of Latinx STEM students matriculating at 2‐year institutions: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4), 440-464. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21485
Masnick, A. M., & Klahr, D. (2003). Error matters: An initial exploration of elementary school children’s understanding of experimental error. Journal of Cognition and Cognitive Development, 4(1), 67-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2003.9669683
Millar, R. (2009). Analysing practical activities to assess and improve effectiveness: The Practical Activity Analysis Inventory (PAAI). Centre for Innovation and Research in Science Education, University of York. http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/educ/research/ResearchPaperSeries/index.htm
Minner, D., Levy, A., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction - What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2008). Junior Certificate Science Syllabus: Ordinary Level and Higher Level. Dublin 2. https://www.education.ie/en/Schools-Colleges/Information/Curriculum-and-Syllabus/Junior-Cycle-/Syllabuses-Guidelines/jc_science_sy_rev.pdf
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide to teaching and learning. National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2005a). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science. National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2005b). How students learn science in the classroom. National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2006). America’s lab report: Investigations in high school science. National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://smile.oregonstate.edu/sites/smile.oregonstate.edu/files/a_framework_for_k-12_science_education.pdf
National Research Council. (2015). Guide to implementing the next generation science standards. Committee on Guidance on Implementing the Next Generation Science Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education: The National Academies Press.
National Science Teaching Association. (2018). Transitioning from scientific inquiry to three-dimensional teaching and learning. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/transitioning-scientific-inquiry-three-dimensional-teaching-and-learning
Nedungadi, P., Malini, P., & Raman, R. (2015). Inquiry based learning pedagogy for chemistry practical experiments using OLabs. In Advances in intelligent informatics (pp. 633-642). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11218-3_56
Nivalainen, V., Asikainen, M. A., Sormunen, K., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2010). Preservice and inservice teachers’ challenges in the planning of practical work in physics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(4), 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9186-z
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Park, M., & Liu, X. (2016). Assessing understanding of the energy concept in different science disciplines. Science Education, 100(3), 483-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21211
Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results of a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37, 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00045-8
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational design research Part B: Illustrative cases. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
Qhobela, M., & Moru, E. K. (2014). Understanding challenges physics teachers come across as they implement learner-centred approaches in Lesotho. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2014.884351
Ramnarain, U. D. (2011). Equity in science at South African schools: A pious platitude or an achievable goal? International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1353-1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.510855
Ramnarain, U. D. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of inquiry-based learning in urban, suburban, township and rural high schools: The context-specificity of science curriculum implementation in South Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.003
Ramnarain, U. D. (2016). Understanding the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on inquiry-based science education at township schools in South Africa. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 598-619. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21315
Ramnarain, U. D., & Schuster, D. (2014). The pedagogical orientations of South African physical sciences teachers towards inquiry or direct instructional approaches. Research in Science Education, 44, 627-650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9395-5
Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground - A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351
Rozenszajn, R., & Yarden, A. (2014). Expansion of biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) during a long-term professional development program. Research in Science Education, 44, 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9378-6
Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58, 136-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2012). Which type of inquiry project do high school biology students prefer: Open or guided? Research in Science Education, 42, 831-848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9222-9
Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten. Science Education, 92(5), 868-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20275
Sandoval, W. A., Kawasaki, J., Cournoyer, N., & Rodriguez, L. (2016). Secondary teachers’ emergent understanding of teaching science practices [Paper presentation]. Transforming learning, empowering learners: The international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS) 2016 (Vol. 2, pp. 737-744).
Schoepp, K. (2005). Barriers to technology integration in a technology-rich environment. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 2(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.18538/lthe.v2.n1.02
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 3-103). Harvard University Press.
Sesen, B. A., & Tarhan, L. (2013). Inquiry-based laboratory activities in electrochemistry: High school students’ achievements and attitudes. Research in Science Educution, 43, 413-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9275-9
Singh, S. K., & Singh, R. J. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ reflections of South African science classrooms. South African Journal of Higher Education, 26(1), 168-180. https://doi.org/10.20853/26-1-157
So, W. W.-M. (2013). Connecting mathematics in primary science inquiry projects. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 385-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9342-3
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
Talanquer, V., Bolger, M., & Tomanek, D. (2015). Exploring prospective teachers’ assessment practices: Noticing and interpreting student understanding in the assessment of written work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 585-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21209
Tichnor-Wagner, A., Taguma, M., & Barrera, M. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: Curriculum analysis. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/Change_management_for_curriculum_implementation_Facilitating_and_hindering_factors_of_curriculum_implementation.pdf
Toplis, R., & Allen, M. (2012). ‘I do and I understand?’ Practical work and laboratory use in United Kingdom schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.812a
UNESCO Institute of Statistics. (2020). ISCED Mappings: UNESCO. http://uis.unesco.org/en/isced-mappings
UNESCO. (2014). ISCED Fields of Education and Training 2013 (ISCED-F 2013). UNESCO-UIS. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/isced-fields-of-education-and-training-2013-en.pdf
VanBalkom, W. B., & Sherman, A. (2010). Teacher education in Bhutan: Highlights and challenges for reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790903503585
Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383-399.
Zion, M., Cohen, S., & Amir, R. (2007). The spectrum of dynamic inquiry teaching practices. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 423-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9034-5
Zuiker, S., & Whitaker, J. R. (2014). Refining inquiry with multi-form assessment: Formative and summative assessment functions for flexible inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 1037-1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.834489

How to cite this article

APA

Akuma, F. V., & Gaigher, E. (2021). A Systematic Review Describing Contextual Teaching Challenges Associated With Inquiry-Based Practical Work in Natural Sciences Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2044. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11352

Vancouver

Akuma FV, Gaigher E. A Systematic Review Describing Contextual Teaching Challenges Associated With Inquiry-Based Practical Work in Natural Sciences Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(12):em2044. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11352

AMA

Akuma FV, Gaigher E. A Systematic Review Describing Contextual Teaching Challenges Associated With Inquiry-Based Practical Work in Natural Sciences Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(12), em2044. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11352

Chicago

Akuma, Fru Vitalis, and Estelle Gaigher. "A Systematic Review Describing Contextual Teaching Challenges Associated With Inquiry-Based Practical Work in Natural Sciences Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 12 (2021): em2044. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11352

Harvard

Akuma, F. V., and Gaigher, E. (2021). A Systematic Review Describing Contextual Teaching Challenges Associated With Inquiry-Based Practical Work in Natural Sciences Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2044. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11352

MLA

Akuma, Fru Vitalis et al. "A Systematic Review Describing Contextual Teaching Challenges Associated With Inquiry-Based Practical Work in Natural Sciences Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 12, 2021, em2044. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11352