Salient Beliefs of Secondary School
Mathematics Teachers Using Dynamic Geometry Software

Kan Kan Chan

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1312a

Salient Beliefs of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers Using Dynamic Geometry Software

Full Text (PDF)

Kan Kan Chan ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ University of Macau, Macau
^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Even though dynamic geometry software (DGS) is becoming an emergent instructional tool for mathematics teachers, many teachers are still in the process of consideration about whether to use it. In order to encourage teachers to use DGS, this study seeks to discover mathematics teachers’ salient beliefs about the use of DGS in mathematics class. The theory of planned behaviour serves as the theoretical framework for understanding teachers’ intentions to use DGS. Thirty mathematics teachers who have knowledge of and experience using DGS were invited to fill out an online survey. Content analysis of teachers’ responses was analysed using the theory of planned behaviour. The behavioural, normative and control beliefs of mathematics teachers using DGS in class were identified. These noticeable beliefs of teachers may be used to create conditions for teachers to successfully integrate this new tool in mathematics class.

Keywords

in-service secondary school mathematics teacher
beliefs
dynamic geometry software

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1312a

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2015 - Volume 11 Issue 1, pp. 139-148

Publication date: 16 Dec 2015

Article Views: 1188

Article Downloads: 533

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kulhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations
Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113-1127.
Anthony, A. B., & Clark, L. M. (2011). Examining Dilemmas of Practice Associated With the Integration of Technology Into Mathematics Classrooms Serving Urban Students. Urban Education, 46(6), 1300-1331.
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245-274.
Bretscher, N. (2008). Dynamic geometry software: the teacher's role in facilitating instrumental genesis. Research in mathematics education, 11(2), 187-188.
Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Yelland, N. J., & Glass, B. (2008). Learning and teaching geometry with computers in the elementaryand middle school. In M. K. Heid & G. H. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics (Vol. 1, pp. 105-154). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Ellington, A. J. (2003). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Calculators on Students' Acheivement and Attitude Levels in Precollege Mathematics Classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(5), 433-463.
Ertmer , P. A. (2005). Teacher Pedagogical Beliefs: The Final Frontier in Our Quest for Technology Integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25- 39.
Fuglestad, A. B., Healy, L., Kynigos, C., & Monaghan, J. (2011). Working with teachers: context and culture. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain (pp. 297-314): The International Commission on Mathematical Instruction (ICMI).
Geiger, V. (2011). Factors affecting teachers' adoption of innovative practices with technology and mathematical modelling. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. B. Ferri & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling (Vol. 1, pp. 305-314): Springer Netherlands.
Gialamas, V., & Nikolopoulou, K. (2010). In-service and preservice early childhood teachers' view and intentions about ICT use in early childhood settings: a comparative study. Computer and Education, 55(1), 333- 341.
Hassandra, M., Vlachopoulos, S. P., Kosmidou, E., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Goudas, M., & Theodorakis, Y. (2011). Predicting students intention to smoke by theory of planned behaviour variables and parental influences across school grade levels. Psychology & Health, 26, 1241-1258.
Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computer and Education, 51, 1499-1509.
Hollebrands, K. (2007). The Role of a Dynamic Software Program for Geometry in High School Students' Understandings of Geometric Transformations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Columbus, Ohio.
Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classroom: a path model. Educational Technology Research and Development 58, 137- 154.
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
Kor, K., & Mullana, B. A. (2011). Sleep hygiene behaviours: An application of the theory of planned behaviour and the investigation of perceived autonomy support, past behaviour and response inhibition. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1208-1224.
Laborde, C. (2007). The role and uses of technologies in Mathematics classroom: Between challenge and modus vivendi. Cannadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 7(68-92).
Laborde, C. (2008). Technology as an instrument for teachers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Working Group 4: Resources and Technology Throughout the History of ICMI, , Rome, Italy. .
Lee, J., Cerreto, F. A., & Lee, J. (2010). Theory of Planned Behavior and Teachers' Decisions Regarding use of Educational Technology. Educational Technology and Society, 13(1), 152-164.
Lin, C.-Y. (2008). Beliefs about Using Technology in the Mathematics Classroom: Interviews with Pre-service Elementary Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(2), 135-142.
Matterne, U., Diepgen, T., & Weisshaar, E. (2011). A longitudinal application of three health behaviour models in the context of skin protection behaviour in individuals with occupational skin disease. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1188-1207.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.): Thousand Oaks.
Morrison, K., & Tang, F. H. J. (2002). Testing to destruction: a problem in a small state. Assessment in Education, 9(3), p.289-317.
Nicol, D., & Milligan, C. (2006). Rethinking technologysupported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. In C. Bryan & C. K. (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education. London: Taylor and Francis Group Ltd.
OECD. (2013). Draft PISA 2012 Mathematical Framework, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46961598.pdf
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
Pierce, R., Stacey, K., Wander, R., & Ball, L. (2011). The design of lessons using mathematics analysis software to support multiple representations in secondary school mathematics. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 95- 112.
Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chaves, O. (2004). Why mathematics textbook matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61-66.
Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2008). Constructions of dynamic geometry: A study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. Computers & Education, 51(1), 297- 317.
Sadaf, A., Timothy J. Newby, & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Computers & Education, 59, 937–945.
Sinclair, N. (2006). Aesthetic Approaches to Teaching Children. New York: Teachers College Press.
Stols, G., & Kriek, J. (2011). Why don't all maths teachers use dynamic geometry software in their classrooms? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 137- 151.
Straesser, R. (2002). Cabri-Geometre: Does Dynamic Geometry Software (DGS) Change Geometry and Its Teaching and Learning? International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 319-334.
Weiss, I., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
Wong, N. Y. (2003). The influence of technology on the mathematics curriculum. In A.J. Bishop, M.A. Clements, C. Keitel & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook on mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 271-321). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education. In J. Frank K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

How to cite this article

APA

Chan, K. K. (2015). Salient Beliefs of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers Using Dynamic Geometry Software. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1312a

Vancouver

Chan KK. Salient Beliefs of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers Using Dynamic Geometry Software. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(1):139-48. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1312a

AMA

Chan KK. Salient Beliefs of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers Using Dynamic Geometry Software. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(1), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1312a

Chicago

Chan, Kan Kan. "Salient Beliefs of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers Using Dynamic Geometry Software". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 1 (2015): 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1312a

Harvard

Chan, K. K. (2015). Salient Beliefs of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers Using Dynamic Geometry Software. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), pp. 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1312a

MLA

Chan, Kan Kan "Salient Beliefs of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers Using Dynamic Geometry Software". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2015, pp. 139-148. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1312a