Science Education and Education for Sustainable Development – Justifications, Models, Practices and Perspectives

Ingo Eilks

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a

Full Text (PDF)

Ingo Eilks ^*

More Detail

^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The year 2014 marks the end of the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). All educational domains and levels, including primary and secondary science education, have been working to contribute to education enabling younger generations to become responsible citizens and promote sustainable development in our world. This paper gives insights into some theoretical foundations of the UN Decade for ESD. Different models of implementing ESD in the teaching of science and technology are presented and illustrated by various case studies, which were developed by the University of Bremen chemistry education group. These examples and the corresponding evaluation case studies show that thoroughly combining the ESD framework with science teaching that follows a socio-scientific issues-based approach to education has great potential for helping students develop many general educational skills. It also opens a path to a more balanced view of science in its societal and professional context. This allows career orientation both in and beyond science and engineering.

Keywords

science education
sustainability
education for sustainable development
socio-scientific issues-based science education
educational reform
teacher education

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2015, Volume 11, Issue 1, 149-158

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a

Publication date: 16 Dec 2015

Article Views: 4987

Article Downloads: 3168

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Anderson, R., & Helms, J. V. (2001). The ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 3-16.
Anastas, P. T., & Warner, J. C. (1998). Green Chemistry theory and practice. New York: Oxford University.
Belova, N. & Eilks, I. (2014). Using advertisings to introduce inquiry and societal oriented science education. Centre for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 4, 31-49.
Bodner, G. (2015). Understanding the change toward a greener chemistry by those who do chemistry and those who teach chemistry. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Relevant chemistry education – From theory to practice. Rotterdam: Sense in print.
Bradley, J. D. (2005). Chemistry education for development. Chemical Education International, 7, retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 01, 2011, at http://old.iupac.org/publications/cei/vol6/index.html.
Breiting, S., Mayer, M. & Mogensen, F. (2005). Quality criteria for ESD-schools. Vienna: ENSI.
Burmeister, M., & Eilks, I. (2012). An example of learning about plastics and their evaluation as a contribution to Education for Sustainable Development in secondary school chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 93-102.
Burmeister, M., & Eilks, I. (2013a). German Chemistry student teachers‘ and trainee teachers‘ understanding of sustainability and Education for Sustainable Development. Science Education International, 24, 167-194.
Burmeister, M., & Eilks, I. (2013b). Using Participatory Action Research to develop a course module on Education for Sustainable Development in pre-service chemistry teacher education. Centre for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3. 59-78.
Burmeister, M., Schmidt-Jacob, S., & Eilks, I. (2013). German chemistry teachers’ knowledge and PCK of Green Chemistry and education for sustainable development. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 169 - 176.
Burmeister, M., Rauch, F. & Eilks, I., (2012), Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 59-68.
De Haan, G. (2006). The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: a ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’-based model for education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 12, 19 – 32.
De Haan, G., Borman, I., & Leicht, A. (2010). Special issue: The midway point of the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Where do we stand? International Review in Education, 56, 199-372.
Eilks, I. (2002). Teaching 'Biodiesel': A sociocritical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching, and students' first views on it. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3, 67-75.
Eilks, I., Nielsen, J. A., & Hofstein, A. (2014). Learning about the role of science in public debate as an essential component of scientific literacy. In C. Bruguière, A. Tiberghien, P. Clément (Eds.), Topics and trends in current science education (pp. 85-100). Dordrecht: Springer.
Eilks, I., Rauch, F., Ralle, B., & Hofstein, A. (2013). How to balance the chemistry curriculum between science and society. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (eds.), Teaching chemistry – A studybook (pp. 1-36). Rotterdam: Sense.
Evans, C., Hogarth, S., & Parvin, J. (2004). Children Challenging Industry: analysis of CCI project data 5 years on. York: University of York.
Feierabend, T., & Eilks, I. (2010). Raising students’ perception of the relevance of science teaching and promoting communication and evaluation capabilities using authentic and controversial socio-scientific issues in the framework of climate change. Science Education International, 21. 176-196.
Feierabend, T., & Eilks, I. (2011). Teaching the societal dimension of chemistry using a socio-critical and problem-oriented lesson plan on bioethanol usage. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 1250–1256.
Feierabend, T., Jokmin, S., & Eilks, I. (2011). Chemistry teachers’ views on teaching ‘Climate Change’ – An interview case study from research-oriented learning in teacher education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11, 85-91.
Garner, N., Hayes, S. M., & Eilks, I. (2014). Linking formal and non-formal learning in science education – A reflection from two cases in Ireland and Germany. Sisyphus Journal of Education, 2(2), 10-31.
Garner, N., Huwer, J., Siol, A., Hempelmann, R., & Eilks, I. (2015). On the development of non-formal learning environments for secondary school students focusing sustainability and Green Chemistry. In V. Gomes Zuin & L. Mammino (Eds.), Worldwide trends in green chemistry education. Cambridge: RSC in print.
Garner, N., Siol, A., & Eilks, I. (2014). Parabens as preservatives in personal care products. Chemistry in Action, 103 (Summer), 36-43.
Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971-993.
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning. London: Routledge.
Hartings, M. R., & Fahy, D. (2011). Communicating chemistry for public engagement. Nature Chemistry, 3, 674-677.
Hawkes, J. (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability: culture‟s essential role in public planning. Melbourne: Common Ground.
Heinrich, M., Minsch, J., Rauch, F., Schmidt, E. & Vielhaber, C. (2007). Bildung und Nachhaltige Entwicklung: eine lernende Strategie für Österreich [Education and sustainable development: A learning strategie for Austria]. Münster: Monsenstein & Vannerdat.
Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Socio-scientific issues as a necessary base for sustainable chemistry education. International Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 9, 1459-1483.
Hofstein, A., & Kesner, M. (2006). Industrial chemistry and school chemistry: making chemistry studies more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1017- 1039.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1347-1362.
Kapanadze, M., & Eilks, I. (2014). Supporting reform in science education in middle and Eastern Europe - Reflections and perspectives from the project TEMPUS-SALiS. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technological Education, 10, 47-58.
Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2009). Promoting scientific literacy using a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching: concept, examples, experiences. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4, 231-245.
Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2010). Research-based development of a lesson plan on shower gels and musk fragrances following a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11, 129-141.
Marks, R., Stuckey, M., Belova, N., & Eilks, I. (2014). The societal dimension in German science education – From tradition towards selected cases and recent developments. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technological Education, 10, 285-296.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. (1972). The limits of growth. New York: Universe books.
McKeown, R. (2002). The ESD toolkit 2.0. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 01, 2011, at http://www.esdtoolkit.org.
McKeown, R. (2006). Education for sustainable development toolkit. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 01, 2011, at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001524/1524 53eo.pdf.
Nespor J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317-328.
Paden, M. (2000). Education for sustainability and environmental education. In K. A. Wheeler & A. P Bijur (eds.), Education for a sustainable future (pp. 7-14). New York: Kluwer.
Rauch, F. (2004). Education for sustainability: A regulative idea and trigger for innovation. In W. Scott & S. Gough (eds.), Key issues in sustainable development and learning: A critical review (pp. 149-151). London: Routledge Falmer.
Sadler, T. D. (2009) Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45, 1-42.
Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom. Dordrecht: Springer.
Sjöström, J. (2013). Towards Bildung-oriented chemistry education. Science & Education, 22, 1873-1890.
Sjöström, J., Rauch, F., Eilks, I. (2015). Chemistry education for sustainability. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Relevant chemistry education – From theory to practice. Rotterdam: Sense in print.
Stolz, M., Witteck, T., Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). Reflecting socio-scientific issues for science education coming from the case of curriculum development on doping in chemistry education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technological Education, 9, 273-282.
Stuckey, M., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‚relevance‘ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49, 1-34.
UN (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011 at www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm.
UN (2005). Resolution A/60/1. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011 at data.unaids.org/Topics/UniversalAccess/worldsummit outcome_resolution_24oct2005_en.pdf.
UNCED (1998). Agenda 21. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011 at www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/.
UNESCO (2005a). World decade of education for sustainable development. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011 at www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/leadingthe-international-agenda/education-for-sustainabledevelopment/.
UNESCO (2005b). Teaching and learning for a sustainable future – a multimedia teacher education programme. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011, at www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/index.htm.
UNESCO (2005c). Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011, at unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001433/143370e.pdf
UNESCO (2006). International implementation scheme. Retrieved from the World Wide Web, July 10, 2011, at unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001486/148654e.pdf
Ware, S. A. (2001). Teaching chemistry from a societal perspective. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 73 (7), 1209– 1214.
Wheeler, K. (2000). Sustainability from five perspectives. In K. A. Wheeler & A. P Bijur (Eds.), Education for a sustainable future (p. 2-6). New York: Kluwer.

How to cite this article

APA

Eilks, I. (2015). Science Education and Education for Sustainable Development – Justifications, Models, Practices and Perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a

Vancouver

Eilks I. Science Education and Education for Sustainable Development – Justifications, Models, Practices and Perspectives. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(1):149-58. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a

AMA

Eilks I. Science Education and Education for Sustainable Development – Justifications, Models, Practices and Perspectives. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(1), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a

Chicago

Eilks, Ingo. "Science Education and Education for Sustainable Development – Justifications, Models, Practices and Perspectives". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 1 (2015): 149-158. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a

Harvard

Eilks, I. (2015). Science Education and Education for Sustainable Development – Justifications, Models, Practices and Perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), pp. 149-158. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a

MLA

Eilks, Ingo "Science Education and Education for Sustainable Development – Justifications, Models, Practices and Perspectives". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2015, pp. 149-158. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1313a