Seventh-grade Students'
Understanding of Chemical
Reactions: Reflections from an
Action Research Interview Study

Ingo Eilks; Jens Moellering; Nicos Valanides

doi:10.12973/ejmste/75408

Seventh-grade Students' Understanding of Chemical Reactions: Reflections from an Action Research Interview Study

Full Text (PDF)

Ingo Eilks ¹ ^* , Jens Moellering ², Nicos Valanides ³

More Detail

¹ University of Bremen, Bremen, GERMANY² Geschwister-Scholl-Gymnasium, Garbsen, and University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, GERMANY³ University of Cyprus, Nicosia, CYPRUS^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This paper discusses seventh-grade students' explanations of dissolution and combustion and also identifies their understanding of the differences between physical and chemical changes. A teaching strategy was initially negotiated within an action research group and this strategy was then employed in teaching seventh-grade students. The teaching approach applied the idea that discrete particle changes can be used to differentiate chemical reactions from simple physical changes. Data were collected by an action research group teacher who conducted interviews with dyads of students from different chemistry classrooms. The interviews were transcribed, subsequently analyzed and evaluated in co-operation with researchers from the university. The main mistakes and alternative conceptions that have been identified are discussed. Further, some implications for developing appropriate teaching strategies and curriculum materials are also summarized.

Keywords

chemical reactions
students' conceptions
Action research

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2007, 271-286

https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75408

Publication date: 23 Dec 2007

Article Views: 5008

Article Downloads: 5810

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Altrichter, H., & Gstettner, P. (1993). Action Research: A closed chapter in the history of German school science. Educational Action Research, 1, 325-360.
Anderson, B. (1986). Pupils' explanations of some aspects of chemical reactions. Science Education, 70, 549-563.
Anderson, B. (1990). Pupils‘ conceptions of matter and its transformations (age 12-16). Studies in Science Education, 18, 53-85.
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B.-S., & Silberstein, J. (1987). Students’ visualization of a chemical reaction. Education in Chemistry, 24, 117–120.
Boo, H. K. (1998). Students' understanding of chemical bonds and the energetics of chemical reactions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 569-581.
BouJaoude, S. B. (1991). A study of the nature of students’ understandings about the concept of burning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 689-704.
Carr, M. (1984). Model confusion in chemistry. Research in Science Education, 14, 97-103.
de Vos, W., & Verdonk, A. H. (1996). The particulate nature of matter in science education and in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 657-664.
Ebenezer, J. V., & Erickson, G. L. (1996). Chemistry students’ conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography. Science Education, 80, 181-201.
Eilks, I. (2002). Participatory Action Research within chemical education: A research method and experiences with its application. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Science Education, Nicosia (Cyprus), 11-13 November 2002, 156-167.
Eilks, I. (2003a). Students’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and misleading textbook illustrations. Chemistry in Action, 2003, no. 69, 35-40.
Eilks, I. (2003b). Co-operative curriculum development in a project of Participatory Action Research within chemical education: Teachers’ reflections. Science Education International, 14, no. 4, 41-49.
Eilks, I. (2005). Experiences and reflection about teaching atomic structure in a jigsaw classroom in lower secondary level chemistry lessons. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 313-320.
Eilks, I., Leerhoff, G., & Moellering, J. (2002). Was ist eigentlich eine chemische Reaktion? [What in fact is a chemical reaction?]. Der Mathematische und Naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht, 55, 84-91.
Eilks, I., & Moellering, J. (2001). Neue Wege zu einem faecherübergreifenden Verständnis des Teilchenkonzepts [New ways towards an interdisciplinary understanding of the particle concept]. Der Mathematische und Naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht, 54, 421- 427.
Eilks, I., & Ralle, B. (2002). Participatory Action Research within chemical education. in B. Ralle & I. Eilks (eds.): Research in chemical education - What does this mean?, 87-98, Aachen: Shaker.
Fischer, H. E., Klemm, K., Leutner, D., Sumfleth, E., Tiemann, R., & Wirth, J. (2005). Framework for empirical research on science teaching and learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 309-349.
Gabel, D., & Sherwood, R. (1983). Facilitating problem solving in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 163–177.
Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students´ alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 65-95.
Gilbert, J. K. & Newberry, M. (2004). The Cams Hill Science Consortium: An inter-institutional collaborative Action Research project in science education. In: B. Ralle, I. Eilks (eds.) Quality in practice oriented research in science education, 53-62. Aachen: Shaker.
Gomez, M.-A., Pozo, J.-I., & Sanz A. (1995). Students’ ideas on conservation of matter: Effects of expertise and context variables. Science Education, 79, 77-93.
Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. L. (1991). Understanding Models and their use in science: conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 799-822.
Hesse, J. J. III, & Anderson, C. W. (1992). Students' conceptions of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 277-299.
Huberman, M. (1993). Linking the practitioner and researcher communities for school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 1-16.
Johnson, P. (1998). Progression in children's understanding of a 'basic' particle theory: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 393-412.
Johnson, P. (2000). Children’s understanding of substances, part I: Recognising chemical change. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 719-737.
Johnson, P. (2002). Children's understanding of substances, part 2: Explaining chemical change. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1037 - 1049.
Johnston, K., & Scott, P. (1991). Diagnostic teaching in the science classroom: Teaching/learning strategies to promote development in understanding about conservation of mass. Research in Science & Technological Education, 9, 193-212.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75-83.
Krnel, D., Watson, R., & Glazar, A. (1998). Survey of research related to the development of the concept of 'matter'. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 257- 289.
Lee, O., Eichinger, D. C., Anderson, C. W. Berkheimer, G. D., & Blakeslee, T. D. (1993). Changing middle school students' conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 249-270.
Leerhoff, G., Kienast, S., Moellering, J., & Eilks, I. (2002a). Der Stoffbegriff und die Stoffeigenschaften - Zentrale Problemfelder bei der Vermittlung der chemischen Reaktion im frühen Chemieunterricht (Part I) [The concept of matter and its properties – Central fields of problems for teaching chemical reactions in introductory chemistry lessons (Part I)]. Der Mathematische und Naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht, 56, 301- 304.
Leerhoff, G., Kienast, S., Moellering, J., & Eilks, I. (2002b). Der Stoffbegriff und die Stoffeigenschaften - Zentrale Problemfelder bei der Vermittlung der chemischen Reaktion im frühen Chemieunterricht (Part 2) [The concept of matter and its properties – Central fields of problems for teaching chemical reactions in introductory chemistry lessons (Part II)]. Der Mathematische und Naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht, 56, 364- 368.
Lythcott, J. (1990). Problem solving and requisite knowledge of chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 67, 248–252.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1 (2). Retrieved from the World Wide Web on 01/02/2002 at www.qualitativeresearch.net/fqs.
Meheut, M., Saltiel, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Pupils’ (11- 12 year olds) conceptions of combustion. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 83-93.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 191-196.
Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1978). Junior high school pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: an interview study. Science Education, 62, 273-281.
Pfundt, H. (1982). Untersuchungen zu den Vorstellungen, die Schüler vom Aufbau der Stoffe entwickeln [Investigations of the concepts students develop about the structure of matter]. Der Physikunterricht, 26, 51-65.
Scott, P. H., & Driver, R. H. (1998). Learning about science teaching: Perspectives from an action research project. In B. J. Fraxer & K. G. Tobin: International Handbook of Science Teaching, 67-80, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Solomonidou, C., & Stavridou, E. (2000). From inert object to chemical substance: Students‘ initial conceptions and conceptual development during an introductory experimental chemistry sequence. Science Education, 84, 382-400.
Stavridou, E., & Solomonidou, C. (1998). Conceptual reorganisation and the construction of the chemical reaction concept during secondary education. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 205-221.
Stavy, R. (1990). Children’s conception of changes in the state of matter: from liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 247-266.
Taber, K. S. (2001). Building the structural concepts of chemistry: some considerations from educational research. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2, 123-158.
Valanides, N. (2000a). Primary student teachers' understanding of the particulate nature of matter and its transformations during dissolving. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 249-262.
Valanides, N. (2000b). Primary student teachers' understanding of the process and effects of distillation. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 355- 364.
Valanides, N., Nicolaidou, A., & Eilks, I. (2003). Twelfthgrade students’ understanding of oxidation and combustion - Using Action Research to improve teachers’ practical knowledge and teaching practice. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21, 159-175.
Witteck, T., & Eilks, I. (2006). Max Sour Ltd. – Open experimentation and problem solving in a cooperative learning company. School Science Review, 88/323 (2006), 95-102

How to cite this article

APA

Eilks, I., Moellering, J., & Valanides, N. (2007). Seventh-grade Students' Understanding of Chemical Reactions: Reflections from an Action Research Interview Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75408

Vancouver

Eilks I, Moellering J, Valanides N. Seventh-grade Students' Understanding of Chemical Reactions: Reflections from an Action Research Interview Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2007;3(4):271-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75408

AMA

Eilks I, Moellering J, Valanides N. Seventh-grade Students' Understanding of Chemical Reactions: Reflections from an Action Research Interview Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2007;3(4), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75408

Chicago

Eilks, Ingo, Jens Moellering, and Nicos Valanides. "Seventh-grade Students' Understanding of Chemical Reactions: Reflections from an Action Research Interview Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2007 3 no. 4 (2007): 271-286. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75408

Harvard

Eilks, I., Moellering, J., and Valanides, N. (2007). Seventh-grade Students' Understanding of Chemical Reactions: Reflections from an Action Research Interview Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), pp. 271-286. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75408

MLA

Eilks, Ingo et al. "Seventh-grade Students' Understanding of Chemical Reactions: Reflections from an Action Research Interview Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 3, no. 4, 2007, pp. 271-286. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75408