• Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple‐representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In Visualization: Theory and practice in science education, Edited by: Gilbert, J. K., Reiner, M. and Nakhleh, M. 191–208. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2017.42.16.
• Annetta, L. A., Cook, M., & Schultz, M. (2007). Video Games: A Vehicle for Problem-Based Learning. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 10(1).
• Bentley, M. L., Ebert, E. S., & Ebert, C. (2007) Teaching Constructivist Science: Nurturing Natural Investigations in the Standards-Based Classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.
• Boller, S., & Kapp, K. (2017). Play to Learn: Everything You Need to Know About Designing Effective Learning Games. Alexandria, VA: Association for Talent Development.
• Bunten, R., & Dawson, V. (2014). Teaching climate change science in senior secondary school: Issues, barriers and opportunities. Teaching science, 60(1), 10-18.
• Cartier, J., Rudolph, J., & Stewart, J. (2001). The nature and structure of scientific models. National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
• Chen, Y., Pan, P., Sung, Y., & Chang, K. (2013). Correcting Misconceptions on Electronics: Effects of a simulation-based learning environment backed by a conceptual change model, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 212-227.
• Chi, M. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161–199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1.
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning by viewing versus learning by doing: Evidence‐based guidelines for principled learning environments. Performance Improvement, 47(9), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20028.
• Cordero, E. C. (2002). Is the ozone hole over your classroom?. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 48(1), 34-39.
• Dawson, V., & Carson, K. (2013). Australian secondary school students’ understanding of climate change. Teaching Science, 59(3), 9-14.
• De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20028.
• Ekborg, M., & Areskoug, M. (2006). How student teachers’ understanding of the greenhouse effect develops during a teacher education programme. NorDiNa, 5, 17–29.
• Farmer, G. T., & Cook, J. (2013). Climate Change Science: A Modern Synthesis: Volume 1-The Physical Climate (Vol. 1). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5757-8.
• Feldman, A., Nation, M., Smith, G.G., & Besalti, M. (2017). Teaching climate change science to high school students: Local place-based approach, web-based novel with computer games, and hands-on activities. In I. Levin & D. Tsybulsky (eds.), Digital Tools and Solutions for Inquiry-Based STEM Learning, New York, NY: IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2528-8.ch002-5225-2528-8.ch002.
• Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. (2002). Games, motivation and learning: a research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607.
• Galindo-Gonzalez, S., Berry, L., Cox, C., Edwards, A., Ellingson, R., Feldman, A., . . . Ryan, J. (2011). Florida Climate Change Education and Training: State University System Cooperative Plan. Retrieved from http://floridaclimate.org/whitepapers/.
• Gayford, C. (2002). Controversial environmental issues: a case study for the professional development of science teachers. International Journal of science education, 24(11), 1191-1200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134866.
• Gee, J. P. (2005). Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. E-Learning, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5.
• Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Hallar, A. G., McCubbin, I. B., & Wright, J. M. (2011). CHANGE: A place-based curriculum for understanding climate change at Storm Peak Laboratory, Colorado. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 92(7), 909. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS3026.1.
• Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 356–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.356.
• Hilgard, E. R. (1980). The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198004)16:2<107::AID-JHBS2300160202>3.0.CO;2-Y.
• Herman, B. C., Feldman, A., & Vernaza-Hernandez, V. (2015). Florida and Puerto Rico Secondary Science Teachers’ Knowledge and Teaching of Climate Change Science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9706-6.
• Junyent, M. & de Ciurana, A. M. G. (2008) Education for sustainability in university studies: a model for reorienting the curriculum, British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), 763-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802041343.
• Keim, D., Mansmann, F., Schneidewind, J., Thomas, J., & Ziegler, H. (2008). Visual Analytics: Scope and Challenges. In: Simoff, S.J., Böhlen, M.H., Mazeika, A. (eds.) Visual Data Mining. LNCS, 4404, 76–90. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71080-6_6.
• Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Mental images and the brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000130.
• Kosslyn, S., Ball, T., & Reiser, B. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 4, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.4.1.47.
• Li, M. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Game-based learning in science education: a review of relevant research, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 877-898. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198004)16:2<107::AID-JHBS2300160202>3.0.CO;2-Y.
• Liu, S., Roehrig, G., Bhattacharya, D., & Varma, K. (2015). In-service teachers’ attitudes, knowledge and classroom teaching of global climate change. Science Educator, 24(1), 12.
• Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Smith, N. (2011). Global warming’s six Americas, May 2011. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 21-21. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950596.
• Pruneau, D., Liboiron, L., Vrain, E., Gravel, H., Bourque, W., & Langis, J. (2001). People’s idea about climate change: A source of inspiration for the creation of educational programs. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6, 121–138.
• Schell, J. (2008). The art of game design: A book of lenses. New York, NY: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780080919171.
• Smith, G. G. & Besalti, M. (2018). Learning Climate Change Science with Computer Games in a Science Fiction Novel, Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2018: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
• Smith, G.G., Lou Y., Feldman, A., Wang, P. (2015, July). Science fiction novels with games for learning climate change science, Proceedings of the annual meeting of EduLearn, Barcelona, Spain.
• Smith, L.A. & Stern, N. (2011). Uncertainty in science and its role in climate policy. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society A. 369: 124. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0149.
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(5), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5.
• Vygotsky, L. (1987). Zone of proximal development. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, 5291, 157.
• Whittaker, T. (May 15, 2018). Hurricane Simulation, Retrieved from https://scijinks.gov/hurricane-simulation/.
• Wise, S. B. (2010). Climate change in the classroom: Patterns, motivations, and barriers to instruction among Colorado science teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(5), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3559695.

APA

Smith, G. G., Besalti, M., Nation, M., Feldman, A., & Laux, K. (2019). Teaching Climate Change Science to High School Students Using Computer Games in an Intermedia Narrative. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(6), em1698. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103570

Vancouver

Smith GG, Besalti M, Nation M, Feldman A, Laux K. Teaching Climate Change Science to High School Students Using Computer Games in an Intermedia Narrative. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(6):em1698. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103570

AMA

Smith GG, Besalti M, Nation M, Feldman A, Laux K. Teaching Climate Change Science to High School Students Using Computer Games in an Intermedia Narrative. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(6), em1698. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103570

Chicago

Smith, Glenn Gordon, Metin Besalti, Molly Nation, Allan Feldman, and Katie Laux. "Teaching Climate Change Science to High School Students Using Computer Games in an Intermedia Narrative". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2019 15 no. 6 (2019): em1698. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103570

Harvard

Smith, G. G., Besalti, M., Nation, M., Feldman, A., and Laux, K. (2019). Teaching Climate Change Science to High School Students Using Computer Games in an Intermedia Narrative. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(6), em1698. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103570

MLA

Smith, Glenn Gordon et al. "Teaching Climate Change Science to High School Students Using Computer Games in an Intermedia Narrative". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 15, no. 6, 2019, em1698. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103570