• Accounts.magister.net. (2019, November 22). Retrieved from https://accounts.magister.net/.
• Alink, N., Asselt, R. van, & Braber, N. den (2012). Samenhang en afstemming wiskunde en de profielvakken [Coherence between mathematics and the profile subjects]. Utrecht / Enschede, The Netherlands: cTWO / SLO.
• Andrá, C., Lindström, P., Arzarello, F., Holmqvist, K., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2015). Reading mathematics representations: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9484-y.
• Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol Sense: Informal Sense-Making in Formal Mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3), 24-35.
• Arcavi, A. (2005). Developing and using symbol sense in mathematics. For the learning of mathematics, 25(2), 42-47.
• Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (2010). Preservice mathematics and science teachers in an integrated teacher preparation program for grades 7–12: A 3-year study of attitudes and perceptions related to integration. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9164-0.
• Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (2012). A longitudinal look at attitudes and perceptions related to the integration of mathematics, science, and technology education. School science and mathematics, 112(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00111.x.
• Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (Eds.). (2014). Initiatives in Mathematics and Science Education with Global Implications. Columbus, OH: International Consortium for Research in Science and Mathematics Education.
• Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2010). Symbol sense behavior in digital activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(3), 43-49.
• Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Charters, E. (2003). The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Education Journal, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v12i2.38.
• Dierdorp, A., Bakker, A., van Maanen, & J., Eijkelhof, H. (2014). Meaningful statistics in professional practices as a bridge between mathematics and science: an evaluation of a design research project. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(9), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-014-0009-1.
• Drijvers, P. (Ed.) (2011). Secondary algebra education. Revisiting topics and themes and exploring the unknown. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
• Furner, J., & Kumar, D. (2007). The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A stand for Teacher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397.
• Geiger, V. S, Muir, T., & Lamb, J. (2016). Video-stimulated recall as a catalyst for teacher professional learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(5), 457-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9306-y.
• Girvan, C., Conneely, C., &Tangney, B. (2016). Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58(206), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.009.
• Goldin, G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A. Kelly, & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 517-545). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Hailikari, T., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2008). The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(5), 113. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj7205113.
• Haskell, R. E. (2001). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction and reasoning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
• Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.). (2017). Learning to solve complex scientific problems. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091938.
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• Leahy, S., & Wiliam, D. (2012). From teachers to schools: scaling up professional development for formative assessment. Assessment and learning, 2, 49-71. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250808.n4.
• Lobato, J. (2003). How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001017.
• Lobato, J., Rhodehamel, B., & Hohensee, C. (2012). “Noticing” as an alternative transfer of learning process. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(3), 433-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.682189.
• Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339621.
• Maher, C. A., & Sigley, R. (2014). Task-based interviews in mathematics education. In S. Lernman (ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8.
• Mestre, J. P. (Ed.). (2005). Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
• Ministry of Education, Culture and Science. (2019, November 23). Retrieved from https://www.government.nl/ministries/ministry-of-education-culture-and-science.
• National Research Council. (2013). The mathematical sciences in 2025. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Netherlands institute for curriculum development. (2018, May 27). Retrieved from http://international.slo.nl.
• OECD. (2018, September 3). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/.
• Ottink, et al. (2014). Systematische Natuurkunde, 8e editie basisboek, 4 vwo [Systematic Physics, 8th edition basic textbook, first year senior pre-university education]. Amersfoort, The Netherlands: ThiemeMeulenhoff.
• Palha, S., Dekker, R., & Gravemeijer, K. (2015). The effect of shift-problem lessons in the mathematics classsroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1589-1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9543-z.
• Palha, S., Dekker, R., Gravemeijer, G., & Van Hout-Wolters, B., (2013). Developing shift problems to foster geometrical proof and understanding. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 32(2), 142-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.12.002.
• Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The journal of mathematical behavior, 22(4), 405-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002.
• Rebello, N. S., Cui, L., Bennett, A. G., Zollman, D. A., & Ozimek, D. J. (2007). Transfer of learning in problem solving in the context of mathematics and physics. Learning to solve complex scientific problems, 223-246. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091938-10.
• Redish, E. F. (2017). Analysing the competency of mathematical modelling in physics. In Key Competences in Physics Teaching and Learning (pp. 25-40). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44887-9_3.
• Reichard, L. A., Dijkhuis, J. H., Admiraal, C. J., Vaarwerk te, G. J., Verbeek, J. A., Jong de, G., ... Voets, S. (2014). Getal en Ruimte, wiskunde A, deel 1 [Numbers & Space, mathematics A, part 1]. Houten, The Netherlands: EPN.
• Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x.
• Roorda, G. (2012). Ontwikkeling in verandering; ontwikkeling van wiskundige bekwaamheid van leerlingen met betrekking tot het concept afgeleide [Development of ‘change’; the development of students’ mathematical proficiency with respect to the concept of derivative]. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://www.rug.nl/staff/g.roorda/proefschriftgerritroorda.pdf.
• Roorda, G., Goedhart, M., & Vos, P. (2014). An actor-oriented transfer perspective on high school students’ development of the use of procedures to solve problems on “rate of change”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 863-889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9501-1.
• Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. C., & McKnight, C. C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of U.S. mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 525¬-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027042000294682.
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). 100 Years of curriculum history, Theory, and Research. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16639025.
• Schoenfeld, A. H., & Sloane, A. H. (Eds.). (2016). Mathematical thinking and problem solving. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315044613.
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795.
• Sonneveld, et al. (2014). Overal Natuurkunde 4 vwo, 4e druk [Everywhere Physics, 4th edition, first year of upper secondary education]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Noorhoff Uitgevers B.V.
• Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (2010). The influence of curriculum on student learning. In B. Reyes, R. Reyes, & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum: Issues, trends and future directions (pp. 351-362). Reston, VA: NCTM.
• TIMMS & PIRLS. (2018, July 24). Retrieved from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu.
• Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., & de Vries M. J. (2018b). Search for symbol sense behavior: students in upper secondary education solving algebraic physics problems. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9766-z.
• Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., Flipse, S., & de Vries, M. J. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs about improving transfer of algebraic skills from mathematics into physics in senior pre-university education. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1486520.
• Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., Flipse, S., Jongbloed, G., & de Vries, M. J. (2018a). Teachers’ beliefs systems about improving transfer of algebraic skills from mathematics into physics in senior pre-university education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1486520.
• Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: an example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics 54, 9-35. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000005212.03219.dc.
• van Zanten, M., & van den Heuvel - Panhuizen, M. (2014). Freedom of design: the multiple faces of subtraction in Dutch primary school textbooks. In Y. Li, & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 231-259). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_12.
• Walshe, G., Johnston, J., & McClelland, G. (2017). Integrating mathematics into science: design, development and evaluation of a curriculum model. In Cognitive and Affective Aspects in Science Education Research (pp. 309-321). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_23.
• Wenger, R. H. (1987). Cognitive science and algebra learning. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 217-251). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Wong, V. J. (2018). The relationship between school science and mathematics education (Doctoral thesis). Retrieved from https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/95881991/2018_Wong_Victoria_1231276_ethesis.pdf.

Vancouver

Turşucu S, Spandaw J, de Vries MJ. The Effectiveness of Activation of Prior Mathematical Knowledge During Problem-solving in Physics. EURASIA J MATH SCI T. 2020;16(4):em1837. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/116446

APA

Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., & de Vries, M. J. (2020). The Effectiveness of Activation of Prior Mathematical Knowledge During Problem-solving in Physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(4), em1837. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/116446

AMA

Turşucu S, Spandaw J, de Vries MJ. The Effectiveness of Activation of Prior Mathematical Knowledge During Problem-solving in Physics. EURASIA J MATH SCI T. 2020;16(4), em1837. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/116446

Chicago

Turşucu, Süleyman, Jeroen Spandaw, and Marc J. de Vries. "The Effectiveness of Activation of Prior Mathematical Knowledge During Problem-solving in Physics". EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 4 (2020): em1837. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/116446

Harvard

Turşucu, S., Spandaw, J., and de Vries, M. J. (2020). The Effectiveness of Activation of Prior Mathematical Knowledge During Problem-solving in Physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(4), em1837. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/116446

MLA

Turşucu, Süleyman et al. "The Effectiveness of Activation of Prior Mathematical Knowledge During Problem-solving in Physics". EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 4, 2020, em1837. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/116446