• Abu Al Hamael, A.B. (2013). Faleat Barnamaj Ithraii fe Aloloum letenmeat Almaharat Alhayatia lada Talameth Alsaf Alsades Alebtedai Bemohafathet Jeddah (Effectiveness of a program in science for the development of personally relevant pedagogy for grade six students in Jeddah). Journal of the College of Education (Banha University), 24(93), 111–182.
• Afaneh, I., & Za’anin, J. A. (2001). Ethraa Moqararai Alryadiat wa Aloloum lessaf Alsades Elebtedaie fi Felesteen fi dhaw Aletejah Almandhomi (Enrich math and science for sixth-grade primary students in Palestine in the light of the systemic trend). Paper presented at the Fifth Scientific Conference of Science Education, Alexandria, Egypt.
• Al-Abdul Karim, R. (2009). Altaleam alam fe alsaudia: almoskelat maroofa wa alhelool motaha. (Saudi public education: The problems are known and the solutions available... but?). Retrieved from http://www.almarefh.net/show_content_sub.php?CUV=364&SubModel=138&ID=507.
• Alanazi, F.H.F. (2014). Between science and place: Saudi children’s ideas of the Earth (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Aberdeen, United Kingdom: University of Aberdeen.
• Alghamdi Hamdan, A. (2013). The road to culturally relevant pedagogy: Expatriate teachers’ pedagogical practices in the cultural context of Saudi Arabian higher education. McGill Journal of Education, 49(1) ,201–226.
• Alghamdi Hamdan, A. (2015). Reforming higher education in Saudi Arabia: Reasons for optimism. In J. Willoughby & F. Badri (Eds.), Higher education in the GCC) pp. 20–33). Dubai, UAE: Springer.
• Al-Ghanem, G. S. D. (1999). Reforming science education in Saudi Arabia: A conceptual framework for the design of a coordinated and thematic science (CATS) module for grades 7-9 (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Morgantown, WV: University of West Virginia.
• Alhebsieh, Z. (2011). AlEtejahat Alhadetha fe taleam Almaharat Alhayatia wa toroq tadresaha wa Dawraha fe benaa shakhseat Altaleb (modern trends and methods in teaching personally relevant pedagogy and their role in building the student’s personality). Journal of Educational Development (Oman), 9(63), 32–35.
• Al-Jazeera. (2011). Issue 13892: Tatweer Manaheg Alreadiat wa Aloloum Fekrah wa Albedayat (The development of mathematics and science curricula: The idea and the beginnings). Retrieved from http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/science-in-a-golden-age.
• Allagani, A. H. (2003). Almanhaj (Alossos – Almokawenat – Altanthemat) (Curriculum: Fundamentals, components and regulations). Cairo, Egypt: Aalam Al Kutub.
• Al-Mooji, A. M. (2000). Wehdat Almawdow Kamehwar Leltakamol fe Manahej Aloloum Belmarhala Aleddadia (Unity of subject as a basis for integration in middle school science curriculum). Fourth Conference on Scientific Education, Al Ismailia, 28(1), 23–38.
• Al-Qahtani, O. A., & Abdul Hamid, N. (2010). An integrated program of mathematics based on the inclusion of some economic concepts and its impact on the development of skills to solve familiar and unfamiliar verbal problems of life familiar and reducing math worries among primary fourth grade pupils. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 25(2), 260–291.
• Al-Rabani, A. H. (2011). Arab and international experiences in teaching personally relevant pedagogy. Journal of Educational Development (Oman), 9(63), 44–47.
• Al-Rabat, B. S. I. (2013). Faleat Barnamej Mogtrah qaim Alaa Anshetat Alreadyat Alhayatia fe Tanmyat Maharat Amalyat Al Elm Alassasia lada Talameeth Alsaf Althaleth Alebtedaie (The effectiveness of a proposed program based on mathematical life activities in developing basic learning skills of grade 3 pupils). Journal of Education, 16, 153–189.
• Al-Shahat, D., Al Badawi, A., Faiz, M. A., & Abdel-Fattah, H. (2012). Effectiveness of the learning strategy based on developing personally relevant pedagogy in science among primary fifth grade pupils. Journal of the College of Education in Port Said, 1, 366–386.
• Al-Tamimi, N., & Mustafa, N. A. (2011). Schools of building and development of personally relevant pedagogy in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for the 21st century. Studies in University Education, 22, 197–268.
• Ammar, S. (2010). Incorporation of some contemporary personally relevant pedagogy in the primary education curriculum. The Message of Education (Oman), 29, 64–77.
• Barber, M., Mourshed, M., & Whelan, F. (2007). Improving education in the Gulf. Dubai, United Arab Emirates: McKinsey & Company.
• Bell, R., & Garofalo, J. (Eds.). (2005). Curriculum series: Science units for grades 9-12. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
• Berlin, D., & Lee, H. (2005). Integration of science and mathematics education: Historical analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 105(1), 15–24.
• Berlin, D. F., & White, A.L. (2000). An innovative integrated mathematics, science, and technology education teacher certification program. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
• Berlin, F., & White, L. (2010). Preservice mathematics and science teachers in an integrated teacher preparation program for grades 7-12: A 3-year study of attitudes and perceptions related to integration. Int’l Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 97–115.
• Berry, J. S., Burghes, D.N., Huntley, I. D., James D. J. G., & Moscardini, A. O. (Eds.) (2004). Mathematical modelling courses (pp. 51–57). Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.
• Berlin, F., & White, L. (2012). A longitudinal look at attitudes and perceptions related to the integration of mathematics, science, and technology education. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 20–30.
• Bosse, J., Lee, D., Swinson, M., & Faulconer, J. (2010). The NCTM process standards and the five “Es” of science: Connecting math and science. School Science and Mathematics, 110(5), 262–276.
• Bouck, C. (2010). Reports of personally relevant pedagogy training for students with intellectual disabilities in and out of school. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(12), 1093–1103.
• Caprile, M., Palmen, R., Sainz, M., & Dente, G. (2015). Encouraging STEM studies for the labour market. Brussels: Directorate-General for Internal Policies, European Parliament.
• Davison, D. M., Miller, K. W., & Metheny, D. L. (1995). What does integration of science and mathematics really mean? School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 226–230.
• Dessouky, E. A., & Yousuf, M. A. (1999). An outlook for the integration of science, mathematics and technology in public high schools’ curriculum with the prospects for 2020. Cairo, Egypt: National Centre for Educational Research and Development.
• Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Edutopia. (2008). Why should schools embrace integrated studies? It fosters a way of learning that mimics real life. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/integrated-studies-introduction.
• English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3) 1–8.
• Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The mathematics and science integration argument: A stand for teacher education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 185–189.
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Finelli, R., Courey, S. J., Hamlett, C. L., Sones, E. M., & Hope, S. K. (2006). Teaching third graders about real-life mathematical problem solving: A randomized controlled study. Elementary School Journal, 106(4), 293–312.
• Ghazanfar, A. K. (2012). McGraw-Hill Education unveils expansion plans. Arab News. Retrieved from http://www.arabnews.com/node/411038#.
• Golshani, M. (2007). Science for humanity: An Islamic perspective. Islam and Science, 5(2). Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0QYQ/is_2_5/ai_n21119039/.
• Hamada, S. A. (2012). Personally relevant pedagogy development programs. Al Qiraa wal Maarifa Magazine, 132, 182–200.
• Hassanein, B. M. (2003). A program of nutrition based on the method of integration and its impact on the development of knowledge attainment and nutrition awareness at the fourth year students of literary sections in Sohag Faculty of Education. Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 37–84.
• Hatch, G., & Smith, D. (2004). Integrating physical education, math, and physics. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 75(1), 42–50.
• Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, A. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Ibrahim, M. A. (2002). Educational curriculum perspectives in the knowledge society. Cairo, Egypt: A’alam Al Kutub.
• International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
• Jiffry, M. F. (2013). Saudi schools lack quality science and math teaching. Arab News. Retrieved from http://www.arabnews.com/news/458491.
• Kliman, M., Mokros, J., & Parkes, A. (2001). Putting math into family life: What’s possible for working parents? Eric Database, ED (480010).
• Kurt, K., & Pehlivan, M. (2013). Integrated programs for science and mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(2), 116–121.
• Lee, M., Chauvot, J., Plankis, B., Vowell, J., & Culpepper, S. (2011). Integrating to learn and learning to integrate: A case study of an online master’s program on science-mathematics integration for middle school teachers. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 191–200.
• Lee, M., Chauvot, J., Vowell, J., Culpepper, S., & Plankis, B. (2013). Stepping into iSMART: Understanding science-mathematics integration for middle school science and mathematics teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 113(4), 159–169.
• Loepp, F. L. (1999). Models of curriculum integration. Journal of Technology Studies, 25(2), 21–25.
• Mansour, N. (2011). Science teachers’ views of science and religion vs. the Islamic perspective: Conflicting or compatible? Science Education, 95(2), 281–309.
• Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
• Marrongelle, K. (2004). How students use physics to reason about calculus tasks. School Science and Mathematics, 104(6), 258–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb17997.x.
• Merrill, C., & Comerford, M. (2004). Technology and mathematics standards: An integrated approach. The Technology Teacher, 64(2), 8–12.
• Miller, K., Metheny, D., & Davison, D. (1997). Issues in integrating mathematics and science. Science Educator, 6(1), 16–21.
• Mohammed, H. (2006). Using life applications in teaching to make mathematics more appealing to fifth grade children (unpublished master’s thesis). Cairo, Egypt: Ain Shams University.
• Mohammed, S. A. M. (2012). Multimedia effectiveness in the development of concepts of life for kindergarten children. Al Qira’a wal Ma’arifa Magazine, 129, 204–235.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
• National Science Teachers Association. (2004). Promoting fair and equitable assessments: A position statement of the National Council for Social Studies. Social Education, 68(4), 290.
• Obaid, W. (2004). Teaching mathematics for all children. Amman, Jordan: Dar Al Maysara.
• Prinsley, R., & Baranyai, K. (2015). STEM skills in the workforce: What do employers want? Occasional Papers Series, issue 9, March. Office of the Chief Scientist.
• Qandil, A. I. (2001). The impact of the integration of science, technology and society in the scientific culture and academic achievement in science for students in the fifth grade. Journal of Science Education, 4(1), 79–119.
• Rennie, L., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012a). Integrating science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Issues, reflections and ways forward. New York: Taylor & Francis.
• Rennie, L., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012b). Knowledge that counts in a global community: Exploring the contribution of integrated curriculum. London: Routledge.
• Saleh, M., & Othman, I. (2006). The effectiveness of the integrated approach based on solving the problems of attainment in science and math and the motivation to accomplish among pupils of various attainment levels in primary school pupils. Journal of the College of Education in Port Said, 1(Dec), 163–227.
• Sherbini, F., & Tanawi, E. (2001). Global approaches in the development of educational curricula. Cairo, Egypt: The Anglo-Egyptian Library.
• Simmers, M. (2011) .It’s Not the Math They Hate Math Education. Paper presented at the 2011 HUIC –Hawaii University International Conferences on Mathematics and Engineering, Ala Moana Hotel, Honolulu Hawaii, USA.
• Slough, W., & Chamblee, E. (2007). Technology as an innovation in science and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 107(6), 222–224.
• Sprinthall, R.C. (2011). Basic statistical analysis. New York: Pearson.
• The Royal Society Science Policy Centre. (2014). Vision for science and mathematics education. London: The Royal Society.

APA

Alghamdi, A. K. H. (2017). The Effects of an Integrated Curriculum on Student Achievement in Saudi Arabia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6079-6100. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01051a

Vancouver

Alghamdi AKH. The Effects of an Integrated Curriculum on Student Achievement in Saudi Arabia. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(9):6079-100. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01051a

AMA

Alghamdi AKH. The Effects of an Integrated Curriculum on Student Achievement in Saudi Arabia. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(9), 6079-6100. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01051a

Chicago

Alghamdi, Amani K. H.. "The Effects of an Integrated Curriculum on Student Achievement in Saudi Arabia". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 9 (2017): 6079-6100. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01051a

Harvard

Alghamdi, A. K. H. (2017). The Effects of an Integrated Curriculum on Student Achievement in Saudi Arabia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), pp. 6079-6100. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01051a

MLA

Alghamdi, Amani K. H. "The Effects of an Integrated Curriculum on Student Achievement in Saudi Arabia". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 9, 2017, pp. 6079-6100. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01051a