Towards a Dialogical Pedagogy: Some Characteristics of a Community of Mathematical Inquiry

Nadia Stoyanova Kennedy

doi:10.12973/ejmste/75258

Full Text (PDF)

Nadia Stoyanova Kennedy ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This paper discusses a teaching model called community of mathematical inquiry (CMI), characterized by dialogical and inquiry-driven communication and a dynamic structure of intertwined cognitive processes including distributed thinking, mathematical argumentation, integrated reasoning, conceptual transformation, internalization of critical thinking “moves,” and collectively constructed concepts. As a form of pedagogy, community of inquiry is non-hierarchical, democratic, pluralistic, ethically and culturally sensitive, and inherently egalitarian. In addition, the structure of the inquiry process in CMI is understood as one in which every individual has an effect on the system as a whole, which is therefore emergent, self-correcting, self-directed, and self-organizing. This paper draws some implications of this form of pedagogy for mathematics education.

Keywords

dialogical pedagogy
community of inquiry
mathematical thinking

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2009, Volume 5, Issue 1, 71-78

https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75258

Publication date: 22 Jan 2009

Article Views: 1458

Article Downloads: 953

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Artigue, M. (1994). Didactical engineering as a framework for the conception of teaching products. In R. Biehler, R. Scholz, R. Strasser & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp.27-41). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Balacheff, N. (1990). Towards a problematique for research on mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21 (4), 258-273.
Ball, D. L. (1999). What mathematical knowledge is entailed in teaching children to reason mathematically? Knowing: Learning Mathematics for Teaching; Proceedings of a Workshop, 1999. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service № ED 456036).
Bauersfeld, H. (1994). Theoretical perspectives on interaction in the mathematics classroom. In R. Biehler, R. Scholz, R. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 133-146). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Brousseau, G. (1986). Basic theory and methods in the didactics of mathematics. In P. Verstappen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Systematic Co-operation between Theory and Practice in Mathematics Education (pp. 109-161). Enschede, The Netherlands: NICD, 1988.
Brousseau, G. (1994). The crucial role of the didactical contract in the analysis and construction of situations in teaching and learning mathematics. In H.-G. Steiner (Ed.), Theory of mathematics education (pp. 110-119). Bielefeld, Germany: University of Bielefeld, Institut fur Didaktik der Mathematik.
Cannon, D., & Weinstein, M. (1993). Reasoning skills: An overview. In M. Lipman, (Ed.), Thinking, children and education (pp. 598-604). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28 (3), 258-277.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1991). Analogies from the philosophy and sociology of science for understanding classroom life. Science Education, 75 (1), 23- 44.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Addison-Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning (pp. 91- 120). New York: Oxford University Press.
Coe, R. & Ruthven, K. (1994). Proof practices and constructs of advanced mathematics students, British Educational Research Journal, 20(1), 41-53.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
Dewey, J. (1939). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.
Finlow-Bates, K., Leman, S., & Morgan, C. (1993). A survey of current concepts of proof held by first year mathematics students. In I. Hirabayashi, N. Nohda, K. Shigematsu & F.-L. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol.1, pp. 252-259). University of Tsukuba, Japan.
Fischbein, E. (1982). Intuition and proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 9-24.
Forman, E. et al. (1998). “You’re going to want to find out which and prove it”: Collective argumentation in a classroom. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 527-548.
Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 258-291.
Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kennedy, D. (1999). Thinking for oneself and with others. Analytic Teaching, 20(1), 15-24.
Kennedy, D. (October 2004). The Role of a Facilitator in a Community of Philosophical Inquiry. Metaphilosophy, 35(4)
Kennedy, D. (2005). Some skills and dispositions of critical/creative/caring thinking in a community of inquiry. Unpublished manuscript.
Kennedy, N. (2006). Reasoning with paradoxes in a community of mathematical inquiry: An exploration toward multidimensional reasoning. Analytic Teaching, 25(3), 59-70.
Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The Emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Hillsdale (pp. 229-269). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leitao, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43, 332-360.
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lushyn, P., Kennedy, D. (2000). The psychodynamics of community of inquiry and educational reform. Thinking, 15(3), 9-17
Maher, C.A., & Martino, A.M. (1996). The development of the idea of mathematical proof: A 5 year-study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 194-214.
Peirce, C. (1958). Selected readings. New York: Dover Publications.
Peirce, C. (1966). Selected writings (P. Wiener, Ed.). New York: Dover Publications.
Perkins, D., Allen, R., & Hafner, J. (1983). Difficulties in everyday reasoning. In W. Maxwell (Ed.), Thinking: The expanding frontier (pp. 177-189).
Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics. Cognition and Instructions, 11(3&4), 365-395.
Resnick, L. (1980). The role of invention in the development of mathematical competence. In R. Kluwe & H. Spada (Eds.), Developmental models of thinking (pp. 213-244). New York: Academic Press.
Resnick, L., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C., & Wathen, S. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3&4), 347-364.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press. Schoenfeld, A. (1992).
Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillian.
Schoenfeld, A. (1994). Mathematical thinking and problem solving. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sharp, A. (1992). What is a community of inquiry? In W. Oxman, N. Michelli & L. Coia (Eds.), Critical thinking and learning (pp. 295-312). Montclair, NJ: Montclair State University.
Siegrist, R. (May, 2005). A Community of Mathematical Inquiry in a High School Setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Montclair State University.
Stein, N., & Miller, C. (1993). The development of memory and reasoning skills in argumentative contexts: Evaluating, explaining, and generating evidence. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 285- 335). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
Toulmin, S. (1969). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. (1999). Knowledge as shared procedures. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp.53-65). Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1994). Argumentation theory. In J. Verschueren & J. Blommaert (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 55-61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge: The M. I. T. Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman, Eds). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1966). Philosophical investigations: A collection of critical essays. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Wood, P. (1985). Sociology, ethnography and teaching practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1(1), 51-62.
Zack, V. (1997). “You have to prove us wrong”: Proof at the elementary school level. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol.4, pp. 291-298). University of Helsinki, Finland.

How to cite this article

APA

Kennedy, N. S. (2009). Towards a Dialogical Pedagogy: Some Characteristics of a Community of Mathematical Inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75258

Vancouver

Kennedy NS. Towards a Dialogical Pedagogy: Some Characteristics of a Community of Mathematical Inquiry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2009;5(1):71-8. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75258

AMA

Kennedy NS. Towards a Dialogical Pedagogy: Some Characteristics of a Community of Mathematical Inquiry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2009;5(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75258

Chicago

Kennedy, Nadia Stoyanova. "Towards a Dialogical Pedagogy: Some Characteristics of a Community of Mathematical Inquiry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2009 5 no. 1 (2009): 71-78. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75258

Harvard

Kennedy, N. S. (2009). Towards a Dialogical Pedagogy: Some Characteristics of a Community of Mathematical Inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(1), pp. 71-78. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75258

MLA

Kennedy, Nadia Stoyanova "Towards a Dialogical Pedagogy: Some Characteristics of a Community of Mathematical Inquiry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 2009, pp. 71-78. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75258