• Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183-198. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
• Ainsworth, S. (2007). The educational value of multiple representations when learning complex scientific concept. In John K. Gilbert, Miriam Reiner & Mary Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in Science Education (pp.191-208). Netherlands: Springer.
• Bowen, M. G. & Roth, W.-M. (2002). Why students may not learn to interpret scientific inscriptions. Research in Science Education, 32, 303 -327. doi: 10.1023/A:1020833231966
• Carvalho, G.S., Silva, R., & Clément, P. (2007). Historical analysis of Portuguese primary school textbooks (1920– 2005) on the topic of digestion. International Journal of Science Education, 29(2), 173–19. doi: 10.1080/09500690600739340
• Clement, P. (2008). Critical analysis of school science textbooks. Science Education International, 19, 93–96.
• Devetak, I. & Vogrinc, J. (2013). The criteria for evaluating the quality of the science textbooks. In M. S. Khine (Eds.) Critical analysis of science textbooks (pp.3-15). Netherlands: Springer.
• Gilbert, J. K. (2007). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science Education. In John K. Gilbert, Miriam Reiner & Mary Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in Science Education (pp.3- 24). Netherlands: Springer.
• Good, R. (1993). Editorial: Science textbook analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 619.
• Han, J. & Roth, W. M. (2006). Chemical inscriptions in Korean textbooks: Semiotics of macro and microworld. Science Education, 90, 173-201. doi: 10.1002/sce.20091
• Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105-143.
• Lawson, A. (2002). Sound and faulty arguments generated by pre-service biology teacherswhen testing hypotheses involving unobservable entities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 237 – 252.
• Lee, V. R. (2010). Adaptations and continuities in the use and design of visual representations in US middle school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1099-1126. doi: 10.1080/09500690903253916
• Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.
• Olson, J.K. (2008). Representing science concepts: The representation continuum. Science and Children, 46(1), 52- 55.
• Orgill, M.K. & Bodner, G. M. (2006). An analysis of the effectiveness of analogy use in college-level biochemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1040–1060. doi: 10.1002/tea.20129
• Pozzer, L. L. & Roth, W. M. (2003). Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1089–1114. Doi: 10.1002/tea.10122
• Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Making sense of photographs. Science Education, 89, 219-241. doi: 10.1002/sce.20045
• Roth, W.M. & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35-59.
• Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle‐school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538- 568. doi: 10.1002/tea.20019
• Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000070306
• Vinisha, K. & Ramadas, J. (2013). Visual representations of the water cycle in science textbooks. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 10(1), 7-36. doi: 10.1177/0973184912465157

APA

Aydin, S., Sinha, S., Izci, K., & Volkmann, M. (2014). Turkish, Indian, and American Chemistry Textbooks Use of Inscriptions to Represent ‘Types of Chemical Reactions’. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1060a

Vancouver

Aydin S, Sinha S, Izci K, Volkmann M. Turkish, Indian, and American Chemistry Textbooks Use of Inscriptions to Represent ‘Types of Chemical Reactions’. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(5):383-93. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1060a

AMA

Aydin S, Sinha S, Izci K, Volkmann M. Turkish, Indian, and American Chemistry Textbooks Use of Inscriptions to Represent ‘Types of Chemical Reactions’. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(5), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1060a

Chicago

Aydin, Sevgi, Somnath Sinha, Kemal Izci, and Mark Volkmann. "Turkish, Indian, and American Chemistry Textbooks Use of Inscriptions to Represent ‘Types of Chemical Reactions’". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2014 10 no. 5 (2014): 383-393. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1060a

Harvard

Aydin, S., Sinha, S., Izci, K., and Volkmann, M. (2014). Turkish, Indian, and American Chemistry Textbooks Use of Inscriptions to Represent ‘Types of Chemical Reactions’. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), pp. 383-393. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1060a

MLA

Aydin, Sevgi et al. "Turkish, Indian, and American Chemistry Textbooks Use of Inscriptions to Represent ‘Types of Chemical Reactions’". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 10, no. 5, 2014, pp. 383-393. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1060a