Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Abu, M. S., Ali, M. B., & Tan, T. H. (2012). Assisting primary school children to progress through their van Hiele’s levels of geometry thinking using Google SketchUp. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 75–84. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.010
• Bishop, A. 1 (1983). Space and Geometry. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.) Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes. (pp. 175-203). Florida: Academic.
• Brown, M. (2004). Illuminating Patterns of Perception : An Overview of Q Methodology. Federal Government Contract Number F19628-00-C-0003 with Carnegie Mellon University. CMU/SEI-2004-TN-026
• Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. doi:10.2307/749317
• Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and Spatial Reasoning. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 420- 464). New York: Macmillan.
• Crowley, M. L. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. In M.M. Lindquist, Ed., Learning and Teaching Geometry, K-12 (p. 1-16). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
• Ding, L., & Jones, K. (2006). Teaching geometry in lower secondary school in Shanghai, China. In Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics (Vol. 26, pp. 41–46).
• Effandi, Z., & Abdul Halim, A. (2012). The activities based on van Hiele’s Phase-Based Learning : Experts ’ and Preservice Teachers ’ Views. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 8(3), 385–395.
• Fuys, D., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. (1988). The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education., 3(1988), 1– 198.
• Job van Exel, Gjalt de Graaf. (2005). Q methodology : A sneak preview (pp. 1–30). Version 05.05. www.jobvanexel.nl
• Mason, M. (1998). The van Hiele levels of geometric understanding. In The Professional Handbook for Teachers: Geometry (Vol. 4, pp. 4–8).
• Ministry of Education Malaysian. (2010). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Matematik KBSM (pp. 1-16). Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.
• Monaghan, F. (2001). What difference does it make? Children’s views of the differences between some quadrilaterals. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 179– 196.
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Highlights From TIMSS 2011 (pp. 1–56). NCES, IES, U.S. Department of Education.
• Noraini, I. (1999). Linguistic Aspects of Mathematical Education: How Precise Do Teachers Need to Be? In M. A. Clements & P. Y. Leong (Eds.), Cultural and Language Aspects of Science. Mathematics and Technical Education. Brunei: Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
• Noraini, I., & Tay, B. L. (2004). Teaching and Learning of Geometry: Problems and Prospects. Masalah Pendidikan, 27. pp. 165-178. ISSN 0126-5024
• Noraini, I. (2007). The effect of Geometers ’ Sketchpad on the performance in geometry of Malaysian students ’ achievement and van Hiele geometric thinking. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 1(2), 169–180.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). PISA 2012 Results in Focus.(pp. 1- 32). Programme for International Student Assessment. OECD.
• Özerem, A. (2012). Misconceptions in geometry and suggested solutions for seventh grade students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 720–729. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.557
• Schafer, M. (2003). The impact of learners’ spatial capacity and worldviews on their spatial conceptualisation: A case study. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Perth.
• Schafer, M., & Atebe, H. U. (2008). “As Soon as the Four Sides Are All Equal, then the Angles Must be 90° Each”. Children’s Misconceptions in Geometry. In M. C. Polaki, T. Mokulu & T. Nyabanyala (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Southern Africa Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology. Maseru: SAARMSTE.
• Schmolck, P. (2002). PQMethod (Version 2.33) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from www.lrz.de/~schmolck/qmethod
• Senk, S. L. (1989). van Hiele levels and achievement in writing geometry proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 309. doi:10.2307/749519
• Usiskin, Z. (1982). van Hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry: Cognitive development and achievement in secondary school geometry project. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of Mathematics education by Pierre M. In Education Study in Mathematics (pp. 95–103).
• van Hiele, P. M. (1999). Developing geometric thinking through activities that begin with play. In Developing Geometric Thinking Through Activities That Begin With Play (Vol. 6, pp. 310–316).
• Wu, D. B., & Ma, H. L. (2005a). A study of the geometric concepts of the elementary school students at the van Hiele level one. In Chick, H. L. & Vincent, J. L. (Eds.). Proceedings 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,4, 329-336. Melbourne, Australia: PME.
• Wu, D. B., & Ma, H. L. (2009). An Application of GM (0.N) on Analyzing the First van Hiele Geometrical Thinking Level. Journal of Grey System, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 161-168. Dec. 2009. ISSN 1028-9488

APA

Tan, T. H., Ahmad Tarmizi, R., Md. Yunus, A. S., & Mohd. Ayub, A. F. (2015). Understanding the Primary School Students’ van Hiele Levels of Geometry Thinking in Learning Shapes and Spaces: A Q-Methodology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), 793-802. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1439a

Vancouver

Tan TH, Ahmad Tarmizi R, Md. Yunus AS, Mohd. Ayub AF. Understanding the Primary School Students’ van Hiele Levels of Geometry Thinking in Learning Shapes and Spaces: A Q-Methodology. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(4):793-802. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1439a

AMA

Tan TH, Ahmad Tarmizi R, Md. Yunus AS, Mohd. Ayub AF. Understanding the Primary School Students’ van Hiele Levels of Geometry Thinking in Learning Shapes and Spaces: A Q-Methodology. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(4), 793-802. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1439a

Chicago

Tan, Tong Hock, Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi, Aida Suraya Md. Yunus, and Ahmad Fauzi Mohd. Ayub. "Understanding the Primary School Students’ van Hiele Levels of Geometry Thinking in Learning Shapes and Spaces: A Q-Methodology". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 4 (2015): 793-802. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1439a

Harvard

Tan, T. H., Ahmad Tarmizi, R., Md. Yunus, A. S., and Mohd. Ayub, A. F. (2015). Understanding the Primary School Students’ van Hiele Levels of Geometry Thinking in Learning Shapes and Spaces: A Q-Methodology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), pp. 793-802. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1439a

MLA

Tan, Tong Hock et al. "Understanding the Primary School Students’ van Hiele Levels of Geometry Thinking in Learning Shapes and Spaces: A Q-Methodology". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 4, 2015, pp. 793-802. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1439a