• Açışlı, S., Yalçın, A. S., & Turgut, Ü. (2011). Effects of the 5E learning model on students’ academic achievements in movement and for issues. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2459-2462. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.128
• Asikainen, M. A., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2009). A study of preand inservice physics teachers’ understanding of photoelectric phenomenon as part of the development of a research-based quantum physics course. American Journal of Physics, 77(7), 658-666. doi:10.1119/1.3129093
• Ates, S. (2005). The effectiveness of the learning-cycle method on teaching DC circuits to prospective female and male science teachers. Research in Science and Technological Education. 23(2), 213-227. doi:10.1080/02635140500266518
• Başer, M. (2006). Effects of conceptual change and traditional confirmatory simulations on pre-service teachers’ understanding of direct current circuits. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5), 367-381. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9025-3
• Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills a commissioned paper prepared for a workshop on exploring the intersection of science education and the development of 21st century skills. Retrieved from https://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/1Bybee_21 st%20Century_Paper.pdf.
• Bybee, W. R., & Sun, B. R. (1990). Piaget for educators (2nd edition). Waveland Pr, Inc.
• Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• De Leone, C. J., & Oberem, G. E. (2004). Toward understanding student conceptions of the photoelectric effect. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceeding, 720, 85-88. doi: 10.1063/1.1807260
• Duran, E., Duran, L., Haney, J., & Scheuermann, A. (2011). A learning cycle for all students. The Science Teacher, 78(3), 56-60.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (sixth edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Ergin, I., Kanlı, U., & Unsal, Y. (2008). An example for the effect of 5E model on the academic success and attitude levels of students’: ‘Inclined projectile motion’. Turkish Science Education, 5(3), 47-59.
• Hırça N., Çalık M., & Seven S. (2011). 5e modeline göre geliştirilen materyallerin öğrencilerin kavramsal değişimine ve fizik dersine karşı tutumlarına etkisi: iş, güç ve enerji ünitesi örneği. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi (elektronik), 8, 139-152.
• Jaakkola, T., & Nurmi, S. (2008). Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 271-283. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00259.x
• Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130-144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
• Lawson, A. E., & Others. (1989). A theory of instruction: using the learning cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED324204)
• Marek, E. A. (2008). Why the learning cycle? Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(3), 63-69.
• McKagan, S. B., Handley, W., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2009). A Research-based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 77(1), 87- 95. doi: 10.1119/1.2978181
• Nas, S. E., Calik, M., & Cepni, S. (2012). Effect of different conceptual change pedagogies embedded within 5E model on grade 6 students' alternative conceptions of 'heat transfer'. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B-Social and Educational Studies, 4(1), 177-186.
• Özdemir, M., & Aras, E. (2008). 12th Grade Physics (in Turkish). Ankara: Aydın Publication.
• PheT Simulation (2006). Photoelectric Effect (1.10) [Physics Education Technology Project]. Retrieved from http://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/photoelectric.
• Ronen, M., & Eliahu, M. (2000). Simulation – a bridge between theory and reality: the case of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(1), 14-26. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00112.x
• Sahin C., Çalik M., & Cepni S. (2009). Using different conceptual change methods embedded within 5e model: a sample teaching of liquid pressure. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B-Social and Educational Studies, 1, 115-125.
• Settlage, J. (2000). Understanding the learning cycle: influences on abilities to embrace the approach by preservice elementary school teachers. Science Education, 84(1), 43-50. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)
• Sokolowski, A. (2013). Teaching the photoelectric effect inductively. Physics Education, 48(1), 35-41.
• Steinberg, R. N., Oberem, G. E,. & McDermott, L. C. (1996). Development of a computer-based tutorial on the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 64(11), 1370-1379. doi:10.1119/1.18360
• Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th edition). London: Mahway.
• Uscinski, J., & Larkin, T. L. (2011). Probing a deeper understanding of modern physics concepts. 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, S2H-1- S2H-6. doi:10.1109/FIE.2011.6143101
• Wong, D., Lee, P., Shengan, G., Xuezhou, W., Qi, Y. H., & Kit, F. S. (2011). The photoelectric effect: experimental confirmation concerning a widespread misconception in the theory. European Journal of Physics, 32(4), 1059-1064. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/32/4/018
• Yıldız, A., & Büyükkasap, E. (2011). The level of understanding of the photoelectric phenomenon in prospective teachers and the effects of “writing with learning” on their success rates. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 11(4), 2268-2274.
• Zacharias, Z. C. (2005). The impact of interactive computer simulations on the nature and quality of post graduate science teachers’ explanations in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 27(14), 1741-1767. doi:10.1080/09500690500239664

APA

TAŞLIDERE, E. (2015). A Study Investigating the Effect of Treatment Developed by Integrating the 5E and Simulation on Pre-service Science Teachers’ Achievement in Photoelectric Effect. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), 777-792. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1367a

Vancouver

TAŞLIDERE E. A Study Investigating the Effect of Treatment Developed by Integrating the 5E and Simulation on Pre-service Science Teachers’ Achievement in Photoelectric Effect. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(4):777-92. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1367a

AMA

TAŞLIDERE E. A Study Investigating the Effect of Treatment Developed by Integrating the 5E and Simulation on Pre-service Science Teachers’ Achievement in Photoelectric Effect. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(4), 777-792. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1367a

Chicago

TAŞLIDERE, Erdal. "A Study Investigating the Effect of Treatment Developed by Integrating the 5E and Simulation on Pre-service Science Teachers’ Achievement in Photoelectric Effect". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 4 (2015): 777-792. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1367a

Harvard

TAŞLIDERE, E. (2015). A Study Investigating the Effect of Treatment Developed by Integrating the 5E and Simulation on Pre-service Science Teachers’ Achievement in Photoelectric Effect. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), pp. 777-792. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1367a

MLA

TAŞLIDERE, Erdal "A Study Investigating the Effect of Treatment Developed by Integrating the 5E and Simulation on Pre-service Science Teachers’ Achievement in Photoelectric Effect". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 4, 2015, pp. 777-792. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1367a