University Students' Visual Cognitive Styles with respect to Majors and Years

Pınar Nuhoğlu Kibar; Buket Akkoyunlu

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1212a

Full Text (PDF)

Pınar Nuhoğlu Kibar ¹ ^* , Buket Akkoyunlu ¹

More Detail

¹ Hacettepe University, TURKEY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Visual cognitive style is an individual difference that is related to the preference or visual imagery tendency of an individual of processing visual information. This study examines the visual cognitive styles of university students according to their study subject, study year and genders and includes 448 first- and third-year university students from seven departments. The results indicate that spatial imagery tendencies were stronger among students in the sciences, whereas verbal tendencies were strong among students in linguistic fields. The spatial imagery tendencies of third-year students from the Department of Physics Engineering and the verbal tendencies of third-year students from the Department of English Language Teaching were significantly higher than those of first-year students of related departments. Different from previous studies the finding about the tendency increment among first to third year of study is remarkable which can be investigated through experimental studies.

Keywords

object imagery
spatial imagery
visual cognitive style

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2016, Volume 12, Issue 2, 321-333

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1212a

Publication date: 17 Jun 2016

Article Views: 1626

Article Downloads: 962

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Allinson, C. O., & Hayes, J. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 119-135. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00801.x
Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2010). Visual objectability: A new dimension of nonverbal intelligence. Cognition, 117(3), 276-301. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.021
Blazhenkova, O. (2008). Individual differences in object/spatial processing and cognitive style (Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University). Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/33/23/3323704.html.
Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2009). The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: theory and measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 638-663. doi: 10.1002/acp.1473
Blazhenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, M. A. (2006a). Object-spatial imagery: A new self report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 239-263. doi: 10.1002/acp.1182
Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, M. A. (2006b). Object and spatial imagery: distinctions between members of different professions. Cognitive Processing, 7(1), 20- 21. doi: 10.1007/s10339-006-0047-9
ChanLin, L.‐J. (1999). Visual Control for Dynamic Presentation in Multimedia Learning, Educational Media International, 36(4), 258-262. doi: 0.1080/0952398990360403
Chen, C., & Sun, Y. (2012). Assessing the effects of different multimedia materials on emotions and learning performance for visual and verbal style learners. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1273–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.006
Grimley, M. (2007). Learning from multimedia materials: The relative impact of individual differences. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental, 27(4), 465-485. doi: 10.1080/01443410601159795
Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 684 - 689.
Höffler, T. N., Prechtl, H., & Nerdel, C. (2010). The influence of visual cognitive style when learning from instructional animations and static pictures. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 479-483. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.03.001
Höffler, T. N., & Schwartz, R. N. (2011). Effects of pacing and cognitive style across dynamic and non-dynamic representations. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1716–1726. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.012
Kollöffel, B. (2012). Exploring the relation between visualizer–verbalizer cognitive styles and performance with visual or verbal learning material. Computers & Education, 58(2), 697–706. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.016
Kosslyn, S. M. (1995). Mental Imagery. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Visual cognition: An invitation to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2, 267- 296.
Kozhevnikov, M., Blazhenkova, O., & Becker, M. (2010). Trade-off in object versus spatial visualization abilities: Restriction in the development of visual-processing resources. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 29-35. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.29
Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 710-726.
Massa, L. J., & Mayer, R. E. (2006). Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style?. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(4), 321-335. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2006.10.001
Mayer, R. E. (2001) Multi-media learning. (1st Eds) Cambridge University Press.
Nuhoğlu, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2012). Nesnesel-uzamsal imgeleme ve sözel bilişsel stil ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanma çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 42, 299-309.
Paivio, A., & Ernest, C. (1971). Imagery ability and visual perception of verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 10(6), 429 432.
Peterson, E. R., Rayner, S. G., & Armstrong, S. J. (2009). Researching the psychology of cognitive style and learning style: Is there really a future?. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 518-523. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.06.003
Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2010). Spatial versus object visualization: The case of mathematical understanding in three-dimensional arrays of cubes and nets. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(2-3), 102-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2010.10.001
Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1(1), 109-126.
Richardson, A. (1994). Individual Differences in Imaging; Their Measurement, Origins, and Consequences. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company, Inc.
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental, 11(3-4), 193 -215. doi: 10.1080/0144341910110301
Riding, R. J., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies. London: David Fulton.
Riding, R., & Sadler-Smith, E. (1992). Type of instructional material, cognitive style and learning performance. Educational Studies, 18(3), 323-340. doi: 10.1080/0305569920180306
Robertson, I. (2003). Opening the mind’s eye: How images and language teach us how to see. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Smith, G. G., Gerretson, H., Olkun, S., Yuan, Y., Dogbey, J., & Erdem, A. (2009) Stills, not full motion, for interactive spatial training: American, Turkish and Taiwanese female preservice teachers learn spatial visualization. Computers & Education, 52(1), 201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.011
Sorby, S., Casey, B., Veurink, N., & Dulaney, A. (2013). The role of spatial training in improving spatial and calculus performance in engineering students. Learning and Individual Differences, 26(August 2013), 20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.03.010
Thomas, P. R., & McKay J. B. (2010). Cognitive styles and instructional design in university learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.002
Xistouri, X., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2011). Elementary students’ transformational geometry abilities and cognitive style. Proceedings from CERME7: The Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. February’11. Rzeszów, Poland.
Yoon, S.-Y., & D’Souza, N. (2009). Different visual cognitive styles, different problem-solving styles? Proceedings from IASDR 2009: International Association of Societies of Design Research. October’09. Coex, Seoul Korea.

How to cite this article

APA

Kibar, P. N., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2016). University Students' Visual Cognitive Styles with respect to Majors and Years. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1212a

Vancouver

Kibar PN, Akkoyunlu B. University Students' Visual Cognitive Styles with respect to Majors and Years. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(2):321-33. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1212a

AMA

Kibar PN, Akkoyunlu B. University Students' Visual Cognitive Styles with respect to Majors and Years. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(2), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1212a

Chicago

Kibar, Pınar Nuhoğlu, and Buket Akkoyunlu. "University Students' Visual Cognitive Styles with respect to Majors and Years". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 2 (2016): 321-333. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1212a

Harvard

Kibar, P. N., and Akkoyunlu, B. (2016). University Students' Visual Cognitive Styles with respect to Majors and Years. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), pp. 321-333. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1212a

MLA

Kibar, Pınar Nuhoğlu et al. "University Students' Visual Cognitive Styles with respect to Majors and Years". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 2, 2016, pp. 321-333. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1212a