A Research on the Generative Learning Model Supported by Context-Based Learning

Fatma Merve Ulusoy; Aysem Seda Onen

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2014.1215a

Full Text (PDF)

Fatma Merve Ulusoy ¹ ^* , Aysem Seda Onen ¹

More Detail

¹ Hacettepe University, TURKEY
^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study is based on the generative learning model which involves context-based learning. Using the generative learning model, we taught the topic of Halogens. This topic is covered in the grade 10 chemistry curriculum using activities which are designed in accordance with the generative learning model supported by context-based learning. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the effects of the activities on students‟ motivation towards context-based chemistry learning, their attitudes towards chemistry lessons and their level of success in understanding the halogen concepts that were taught. The sample of the study consisted of 60 grade 10 students in a high school in Ankara, Turkey. The study was conducted using a pretest – posttest design with a control group of 30 students and a treatment group of 30 students. The Context-Based Chemistry Motivation Scale, the Attitudes towards Chemistry Scale and the Halogens Achievement Test were used as data collection tools in the study. The study concluded that the context-based learning activities improved students‟ motivation in learning chemistry and their attitudes towards the chemistry course as well as increasing their achievement levels in the test.

Keywords

context-based learning
generative learning model
context-based chemistry
motivation
attitudes towards chemistry

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1215a

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2014 - Volume 10 Issue 6, pp. 537-546

Publication date: 15 Dec 2014

Article Views: 1519

Article Downloads: 776

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Acar, B., & Yaman, M. (2011). The effects of contextbased learning on students‟ levels of knowledge and interest. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40, 1-10.
Andrée, M. (2003, August 19-23). Everyday-life in the science classroom: A study on ways of using and referring to everyday-life. Paper presented at the ESERA Conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
Ayas, A. (1995). Fen bilimlerinde program geliştirme ve uygulama teknikleri üzerine bir çalışma: İki çağdaş yaklaşımın değerlendirilmesi. (A study on curriculum development and application techniques: Evaluation of two modern approaches). Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 11, 149-155.
Barker, V., & Millar, R. (1999). Students‟ reasoning about basic chemical reactions: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal Science Education, 21(6), 645-665.
Becker, H. J. (1983). Eine empirische untersuchung zur beliebtheit von chemieunterricht. (An empirical investigation on the popularity of chemistry teaching). Chimica Didactica, 2, 97-123.
Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 999-1015.
Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. & Hogarth, S. (2006). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and sts approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347-370.
Böcher, J. (2005). Halogenverbindungen im alltag. (Halogen compounds in everyday life). Retrieved August 12, 2011, from http://www.chids.de/dachs/expvortr/ 719Halogenverbindungen_Boecher.pdf
Choi, H. J., & Johnson, S. D. (2005). The effect of context-based video instruction on learning and motivation in online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 215-227
Coştu, S. (2009). Teacher experiences from a learning environment based on contextual teaching and learning in mathematics teaching. Master‟s Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Çalık, M. (2006). Devising and implementing guide materials related to solution chemistry topic in grade 9 based on constructivist learning theory. Doctoral Dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Çam, F. (2008). The effects of context-based learnıng approach in biology lesson. Master‟s Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Demircioğlu, H. (2008). Developing instructional materials about the topic of states of matter based on the context based approach for primary students teachers and probing their effectiveness. Doctoral Dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.
Demircioğlu, H., Demircioğlu, G., & Çalık, M. (2009). Investigating effectiveness of storylines embedded within context based approach: A case for the periodic table. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10, 241-249.
Gilbert, J. K. (2006, September 7-9). Context-based approaches to the design of science curricula. Paper presented at the 7.National Sciences and Mathematics Education Conference, Ankara, Turkey.
Gräber, W. (1992). Interesse am unterrichtsfach chemie, an inhalten und tätigkeiten. (Interest in subject chemistry, contents and occupations). Chemie in der Schule, 39(10), 354-358.
Gutwill-Wise, J.P. (2001). The impact of active and context-based learning in introductory chemistry courses: An early evaluation of the modular approach. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(5), 684– 690.
Hand, B., & Treagust, D. F. (1991). Student achievement and science curriculum development using a constructivist framework. School Science and Mathematics, 91(4), 172-176.
Henderleiter, J., & Pringle, D.L. (1999). Effect of context-based laboratory experiments on attitudes of analytical chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(1), 100-106.
Hırça, N. (2012). The effects of hands on activities depend on context-based learning approach on understanding of physics and attitudes towards physics course. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute 9(17), 313-325.
Huntemann, H., Haarmann, E. M., & Parchmann, I. (2000). Schüleraussagen zur unterrichtsreihe „treibstoffe in der diskussion‟: Eine erste untersuchung zur konzeption chemie im kontext. (Students‟ views about instructional plan „fuels in the discussion‟: First investigation about context based learning). CHEMKON, 7(3), 131-136.
Huntemann, H., Paschmann, A., Parchmann, I., & Ralle, B. (1999). Chemie im kontext-ein neues konzept für den chemieunterricht? Darstellung einer kontextorientierten konzeption für den 11. jahrgang. (Is context-based learning a new concept for chemistry lessons? Representation of contextoriented concept for 11. grade). CHEMKON, 6(4), 191-196.
İlhan, N. (2010). The effect of context based approach on the learning of chemical equilibrium. Doctoral Dissertation, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Kan, A., & Akbaş, A.(2005). A study of developing an attitude scale towards chemistry. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 1(2), 227-237.
Karagölge, Z., & Ceyhun, İ. (2002). Öğrencilerin bazı kimyasal kavramları günlük hayatta kullanma becerilerinin tespiti. (Determination of students‟ using skills of some chemical concept in daily life). Kastamonu Education Journal, 10(2), 287-290.
Kerber, R. C., & Akhtar, M. J. (1996). Getting real: A general chemistry laboratory program focusing on „real world‟ substances. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(11), 1023-1025.
Kesner, M., Hofstein, A., & Ben-Zvi, R. (1997). Student and teacher perceptions of industrial chemistry case studies. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 725-738.
Kim, M., Yoon, H., Rae Ji, Y., & Song, J. (2012). The dynamics of learning science in everyday contexts: A case study of everyday science class in Korea. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 71–97.
King, D., Bellocchi, A., & Ritchie, S. M. (2008). Making connections: Learning and teaching chemistry in context. Research in Science Education, 38, 365-384.
King, D. T., & Ritchie, S.M. (2013). Academic success in context-based chemistry: demonstrating fluid transitions between concepts and context. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1159- 1182.
Koçak, C. (2012). Evaluation of chemistry topics within the daily life concept. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 42, 262-273.
Köse, E., & Tosun, F. (2011). Effect of context based learning in students‟ achievement about nervous system. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(2), 91- 106.
Kutu, H., & Sözbilir, M. (2011). Teaching chemistry in our lives unit in the 9th grade chemistry course through context-based ARCS instructional model. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Education, 30(1), 29-62.
Kyle, W. C., Abell, S., & Shymansky, J. A. (1989). Enhancing prospective teachers' conceptions of teaching and science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1(1), 10-13.
Ledwig, G., & Nick, S. (2009). Das ende der pharaoschlangen? (The end of the Pharaoh's serpent).CHEMKON, 16(1), 38.
Lubben, F., Campbell, B., & Dlamini, B. (1996). Contextualizing science teaching in Swaziland: some student reactions. International Journal of Science Education, 18(3), 311-320.
Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom:A review of the research on the participation of girls in physics. London, UK: Institute of Physics Report.
Osborne, R. J., & Collins, J. (2001). Pupils‟ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467.
Osborne, R.J., & Wittrock, M.C. (1983). Learning science: A generative process. Science Education, 67 (4) 489-508.
Palmer, D. (1997). The effect of context on students‟ reasoning about forces. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 681-696.
Parchmann, I., Graesel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B. (2006). Chemie im kontext: A symbiotic implementation of a contextbased teaching and learning approach. International Journal Science Education, 28(9), 1041-1062.
Pekdağ, B. (2010). Alternative methods in learning chemistry: Learning with animation, simulation, video and multimedia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 79-110.
Peşman, H., & Özdemir, Ö. F. (2012). Approach– method interaction: The role of teaching method on the effect of context-based approach in physics instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2127-2145.
Ramsden, M. J. (1997). How does a context‐based approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16+?. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 697-710.
Reid, N. (2000). The presentation of chemistry logically driven or applications-led?. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice In Europe, 1(3), 381-392.
Ruis, S.P. (1988). Something‟s wrong with chemistry textbooks. Journal of Chemical Education, 65, 720– 721.
Sari, Ö. (2010). Developıng a materıal based on the context based approach on the topıc the earth and the unıverse for the 5th grade prımary students. Master‟s Thesis, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Schwartz, A. T. (2006). Contextualised chemistry education: The American experience. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 977-998.
Sözbilir, M., Sadi, S., Kutu, H., & Yıldırım, A. (2007, June 20-22). Kimya eğitiminde içeriğe/bağlama dayalı (context-based) öğretim yaklaşımı ve dünyadaki uygulamaları. (Context-based learning in chemistry teaching and its applications in the world). Paper presented at I. National Chemistry Education Congress, Istanbul, Turkey.
Steinhoff, B. (2004). Wissens- und kompetenzerwerb in einem unterricht nach chemistry ım kontext- exemplarische entwicklung eines wissenstests für die unterrichtseinheit (k) ein auto ohnne kunststoffe. (Knowledge and expertise working in a teaching chemistry in the context of exemplary development of a knowledge tests for the teaching unit (not) a car without plastics). Doctoral Dissertation, Cristian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany.
Toroslu, S. (2011). Effect of 7E learning model integrated with real-life context based instruction on students’ conceptual achievement, misconceptions and science process skills about energy. Doctoral Dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ünal,H. (2008). Researchıng the effects of conductıng the prımary school scıence and technology lesson accordıng to context based approach on the matter-heat subject. . Master‟s Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ültay, E., & Ültay, N. (2013). Designing, implementing and evaluating a context-based instructional materials on buoyancy force. Energy Educatıon Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 5(1), 385-394.
Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2005). The conceptions of chemistry teachers about teaching and learning in the context of a curriculum innovation. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 303-322.
Vos, M. A. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M. G., & Pilot, A. (2011). Classroom implementation of contextbased chemistry education by teachers: The relation between experiences of teachers and the design of materials. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1407-1432.
Wanjek, J. (2000). Einflüsse von alltagsorientierung und schülerexperimenten auf den erfolg von chemieunterricht. (The effects of everyday orientation and student experiments on the performance of chemistry teaching). Doctoral Dissertation, Westfälischen Wilhelms-University, Münster, Germany.
Wörn, A., Melle I., & Bader H. J. (1999). Einfache stofftrennung am beispiel schokolade genussmittel im anfangsunterricht chemie. (Simple separation of substance for example chocolate in teaching elementary chemistry). CHEMKON, 6(1), 25.
Yaman, M. (2009). Context and methods on respiration and energy acquisition interesting for students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 37, 215-228.
Yücel, A.S. (2007). An analysis of the factors affecting student achievement in chemistry lessons. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2(S) 712-722.

How to cite this article

APA

Ulusoy, F. M., & Onen, A. S. (2014). A Research on the Generative Learning Model Supported by Context-Based Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(6), 537-546. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1215a

Vancouver

Ulusoy FM, Onen AS. A Research on the Generative Learning Model Supported by Context-Based Learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(6):537-46. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1215a

AMA

Ulusoy FM, Onen AS. A Research on the Generative Learning Model Supported by Context-Based Learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(6), 537-546. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1215a

Chicago

Ulusoy, Fatma Merve, and Aysem Seda Onen. "A Research on the Generative Learning Model Supported by Context-Based Learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2014 10 no. 6 (2014): 537-546. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1215a

Harvard

Ulusoy, F. M., and Onen, A. S. (2014). A Research on the Generative Learning Model Supported by Context-Based Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(6), pp. 537-546. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1215a

MLA

Ulusoy, Fatma Merve et al. "A Research on the Generative Learning Model Supported by Context-Based Learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 10, no. 6, 2014, pp. 537-546. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1215a