Can a Syllabus Change Impact on
Students’ Perceptions of Science?
Fragmented and Cohesive
Conceptions of Physics

Manjula Devi Sharma; Chris Stewart; Rachel Wilson; Muhammed Sait Gökalp

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2013.914a

Can a Syllabus Change Impact on Students’ Perceptions of Science? Fragmented and Cohesive Conceptions of Physics

Full Text (PDF)

Manjula Devi Sharma ¹ ^* , Chris Stewart ¹, Rachel Wilson ¹, Muhammed Sait Gökalp ²

More Detail

¹ University of Sydney, Australia² Dumlupınar University, Turkey^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

In recent decades, the literature paid attention to students’ conceptions of the nature of disciplines. This study aimed to investigate how students’ cohesive and fragment conceptions of physics changed with a major change in senior high school physics syllabus. We obtained measures of conceptions of physics by utilizing a 20-item questionnaire and triangulated by open-ended responses. The sample was 1979 first year university students from three different years surveyed in their first laboratory session. The first cohort of 780 first year university students had experienced the old syllabus in high school and the next two cohorts of 511 and 688 first year university students had experienced a rejuvenated high school syllabus. By establishing the reliability and validity we found that there exists a substantial shift in student conceptions of the cohesiveness of physics coinciding with the school syllabus change. This shift was mirrored in qualitative data. Furthermore, students with more previous engagement in physics learning, on the average, demonstrated less fragmented and more cohesive conceptions with the rejuvenated syllabus than with the old syllabus.

Keywords

academic engagement
conceptions
university students
curricular reform
physics education

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 9, Issue 1, 2013, 33-44

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.914a

Publication date: 27 Jan 2013

Article Views: 2442

Article Downloads: 1063

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38, 67–90.
Andrews, P., & Hatch, G. (1999). A new look at secondary teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and its teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 203-223.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Education Research.
Biggs, J. B. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12, 73–85.
Biggs, J. B. (1999). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18, 57-75.
Binnie, A. (2004). Development of a senior physics syllabus in New South Wales. Physics Education, 39, 490-495.
Board of Studies (2002). Physics Stage 6 Syllabus. Sydney: NSW Board of Studies. http://www.boardofstudies.nsw. edu.au/syllabus_hsc/pdf_doc/physics_stg6_syl.pdf. Retrieved January 12, 2008.
Booth, S., & Ingerman, A. (2002). Making sense of physics in the first year of study. Learning and Instruction, 12, 493- 507.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Belkapp Press.
Burke, K. (2003). Education Reporter; Dumbed down physics bores the brightest, The Sydney Morning Herald, Weekend Edition, November 1-2, 2003.
Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum
Clayton, M. (1997). Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373-384.
Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction, 4, 331–345.
Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998a). Qualitatively different experiences of learning mathematic at university. Learning and Instruction, 8 (5), 455–468.
Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998b). University Mathematics Students’ Conceptions of Mathematics. Studies in Higher Education, 23(1), 87–94.
Dahlgren, L. O. & Marton, F. (1978). Students’ conceptions of subject matter: an aspect of learning and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 3(1), 25-35.
Entwistle, N. J., Meyer, J. H. F., & Tait, H. (1991). Student failure: disintegrated perceptions of studying and the learning environment. Higher Education, 21, 249-261.
Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). The effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on SEM fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 56-83.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Haggis, T. (2006). Pedagogies for diversity: retaining critical challenge amongst fears of dumbing down. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 521-535.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Karimiloff_Smith, A. (1992). Beyond Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford
Mji, A., & Klass E. N. (2001). Psychometric characteristics of the conceptions of mathematics questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 88, 825-831.
Lyons, T. (2005). The puzzle of falling enrolments in physics and chemistry courses: Putting some pieces together. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 285-311
Preacher, K. J., & MacCullum, R. C. (2003). Repeating Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2(1), 13-43.
Prosser, M., & Millar, R. (1989). The “how” and “what” of learning physics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, IV (4), 513–528.
Prosser, M., Walker, P., & Millar, R. (1996). Differences in students’ perceptions of learning physics. Physics Education, 31, 43-48.
Prosser, M., Trigwell K., Hazel E., & Waterhouse F. (2000). Students’ experiences of studying physics concepts: The effects of disintegrated perceptions and approaches. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 61-74.
Reigler, A. (2001). Towards a radical constructivist understanding of science. Foundations of Science. Special issue: The Impact of Radical Constructivism on Science 6(13):130.
Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2002). Students’ conceptions of statistics: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(2). Retrieved on 12 January 2008 from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n2/reid.html.
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37, 371–391.
Sharma, M. D., Pollard, J., Mendez, A., Mills, D., O’Byrne, J., Scott, D., Hagon, S., Gribble, J., Kirkup, L., Livett, M., Low, D., Merchant, A., Rayner, A., Swan, G., Zadnick, M. & Zealey, W. (2008). What does a physics undergraduate education give you? A perspective from Australian physics. European Journal of Physics, 29, 59-72.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173– 180.
Tongchai, A., Sharma, M. D., Johnston, I. D., Arayathanitkul, K. & Soankwan, C. (2009) Developing, evaluating and demonstrating the use of a conceptual survey in Mechanical Waves. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2437-2457.
Wei, B., & Thomas, G. P. (2006). An examination of the change of the Junior Secondary School Chemistry Curriculum in the P. R. China: In the view of scientific literacy. Research in Science Education, 36, 403-418.

How to cite this article

APA

Sharma, M. D., Stewart, C., Wilson, R., & Gökalp, M. S. (2013). Can a Syllabus Change Impact on Students’ Perceptions of Science? Fragmented and Cohesive Conceptions of Physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.914a

Vancouver

Sharma MD, Stewart C, Wilson R, Gökalp MS. Can a Syllabus Change Impact on Students’ Perceptions of Science? Fragmented and Cohesive Conceptions of Physics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2013;9(1):33-44. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.914a

AMA

Sharma MD, Stewart C, Wilson R, Gökalp MS. Can a Syllabus Change Impact on Students’ Perceptions of Science? Fragmented and Cohesive Conceptions of Physics. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2013;9(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.914a

Chicago

Sharma, Manjula Devi, Chris Stewart, Rachel Wilson, and Muhammed Sait Gökalp. "Can a Syllabus Change Impact on Students’ Perceptions of Science? Fragmented and Cohesive Conceptions of Physics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2013 9 no. 1 (2013): 33-44. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.914a

Harvard

Sharma, M. D., Stewart, C., Wilson, R., and Gökalp, M. S. (2013). Can a Syllabus Change Impact on Students’ Perceptions of Science? Fragmented and Cohesive Conceptions of Physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), pp. 33-44. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.914a

MLA

Sharma, Manjula Devi et al. "Can a Syllabus Change Impact on Students’ Perceptions of Science? Fragmented and Cohesive Conceptions of Physics". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 9, no. 1, 2013, pp. 33-44. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.914a