• Anderson, J. R. & Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston.
• Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
• Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359.
• Beyerbach, B. A. (1998). Development a technical vocabulary: preserves teachers’ concept maps. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90032-7.
• Biehler, R. F., & Snowman, J. (1990). Psychology applied to teaching (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
• Bieneik, V. Y. (2008). Implementation of a cognitive apprenticeship model on student programming and perception of problem-solving ability: An exploratory study. A dissertation of Ph.D., Capella University.
• Brookover, W. B., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: School can make a difference. New York: Praeger.
• Chiou, C. C. (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45, 375－387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802377240.
• Chiou, C. C. (2009). Effects of concept mapping strategy on learning performance in business and economics statistics. Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 55－69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802602582.
• Chiou, C. C., Lee, L. T., & Liu, Y. Q. (2012). Effect of Novak colorful concept map with digital teaching materials on student academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 192－201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.023.
• Chiou, C. C., Tien, L. C., & Lee, L. T. (2015). Effects on learning of multimedia animation combined with multidimensional concept maps. Computers & Education, 80, 211－223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.002.
• Chung, K. K. H. (2008) What effect do mixed sensory mode instructional formats have on both novice and experienced learners of Chinese characters? Learning and Instruction, 18, 96－108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.001.
• Deimann, M., & Keller. J. M. (2006). Volitional aspects of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15, 137－158.
• Ebel, R. L. & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Efklides, A., Kourkoulou, A., Mitsiou, F., & Ziliaskopoulou, D. (2006). Metacognitive knowledge of effort, personality factors, and mood state: Their relationships with effort-related metacognitive experiences. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 33－49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6581-0.
• Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a generative activity: Eight learning strategies that promote understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707085.
• Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300.
• Garner, R., Gillingham, M., & White, C. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0601_2.
• Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92.
• Heidig, S., Müller, J., & Reichelt, M. (2015). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Differentiation on relevant design features and their effects on emotions and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.009.
• Holzinger, A., Kickmeier-Rust, M. & Albert, D. (2008). Dynamic media in computer science education; Content complexity and learning performance: Is less more? Educational Technology & Society, 11, 279－290.
• Huang, H. S., Chiou, C. C., Chiang, H. K., Lai, S. H., Huang, C. Y., & Chou, Y. W. (2012). Effects of multidimensional concept maps on fourth graders’ learning in web-based computer course. Computers & Education, 58, 863－873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.016.
• Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122－1131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122.
• Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1－12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.1.1.
• Keefe, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1997). Instruction and the learning environment. NY: Eye On Education, Inc.
• Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Kieso, D., Weygandt, J., & Kimmel, P. (2012). Financial Accounting (8th ed). John Wiley & Sons.
• Lamberski, R. J. (1980). A comprehensive and critical review of the methodology and findings in color investigations. Syracuse, NY: ERIC.
• Lehman, S., Schraw, G., McCrudden, M. T., & Hartley, K. (2007). Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 569－587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006. 07.002.
• Lu, L., & Lin, Y. C. (2003). Academic achievement and self-concept: Chinese and Japanese adolescents. Fu Jen Studies: Science and Engineering, 37, 43－62.
• Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. A., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.
• Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2003).Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Education psychologist, 38, 43－52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6.
• Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions. Educational Psychologist, 32, 1－19. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1.
• Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125－139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6.
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816819.004.
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678.
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). Computer games for learning: An evidence-based approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002).Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 87－99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013184611077.
• Mayer, R. E., Heiser, H., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187.
• McPherson, S. (2000). Expert-novice differences in planning strategies during collegiate singles tennis competition. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 22, 39－62. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.22.1.39.
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81－97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158.
• Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A Test of the method‐affects‐learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 149－158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x.
• Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 937-950. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660271003.
• Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984).Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173469.
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
• Paivio,A., Sadoski, M. (2011). Lexicons, contexts, events, and images: Commentary on from the perspective of dual coding theory. Cognitive Science, 35, 198－209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01146.x.
• Park, B., & Brünken, R. (2015). The Rhythm method: A new method for measuring cognitive load – an experimental dual-task study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 232－243. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3100.
• Park, B., Flowerday, T., & Brünken, R. (2015). Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 267－278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.061.
• Park, B., Korbach, A., & Brünken, R. (2015). Do learner characteristics moderate the seductive-details-effect? A cognitive load-study using eye-tracking. Educational Technology & Society, 18, 24–36.
• Park, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 125－127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.005.
• Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315－341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4.
• Pekrun, R., Götz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002.
• Pett, D. & Wilson, T. (1996). Color research and its application to the design of instructional materials. ETR & D, 44, 19－35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300423.
• Plass, J. L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E. O., Homer, B. D., & Um, E. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.006.
• Plass, J., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.) (2010). Cognitive load theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.
• Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 221－238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560590949359.
• Schar, S. G., & Zimmermann, P. G. (2007). Investigating means to reduce cognitive load from animations: applying differentiated measures of knowledge representation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 64－78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782497.
• Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422－445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422.
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation model. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.) Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723.
• Stone, C. A., & Sobel, M. E. (1990). The robustness of estimates of total indirect effects in covariance structure models estimated by maximum likelihood. Psychometrika, 55, 337－352. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295291.
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science. 12, 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.
• Sweller, J., van Merrie¨nboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205.
• Tien, L. C., Chiou, C. C., & Liao, C. W. (2018). Effect of digital materials with combining multimedia and concept maps on cognitive learning: A mediating effect of cognitive load. International Journal on Digital Learning Technology, 10(1), 95-126. https://doi.org/10.3966/2071260X2018011001004.
• Um, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026609.
• Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

APA

Tien, L.-C., Chiou, C.-C., & Lee, Y.-S. (2018). Emotional Design in Multimedia Learning: Effects of Multidimensional Concept Maps and Animation on Affect and Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1612. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94229

Vancouver

Tien LC, Chiou CC, Lee YS. Emotional Design in Multimedia Learning: Effects of Multidimensional Concept Maps and Animation on Affect and Learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(12):em1612. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94229

AMA

Tien LC, Chiou CC, Lee YS. Emotional Design in Multimedia Learning: Effects of Multidimensional Concept Maps and Animation on Affect and Learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(12), em1612. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94229

Chicago

Tien, Li-Chu, Chei-Chang Chiou, and Yueh-Shian Lee. "Emotional Design in Multimedia Learning: Effects of Multidimensional Concept Maps and Animation on Affect and Learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 12 (2018): em1612. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94229

Harvard

Tien, L.-C., Chiou, C.-C., and Lee, Y.-S. (2018). Emotional Design in Multimedia Learning: Effects of Multidimensional Concept Maps and Animation on Affect and Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1612. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94229

MLA

Tien, Li-Chu et al. "Emotional Design in Multimedia Learning: Effects of Multidimensional Concept Maps and Animation on Affect and Learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 12, 2018, em1612. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/94229