• Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature, and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.
• Barrett, M. A., & Bainton, D. (2016). Re-interpreting relevant learning: an evaluative framework for secondary education in a global language. Comparative Education, 52(3), 392-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2016.1185271
• Bevevino, M., Dengel, J., & Adams, K. (1999). Constructivist theory in the classroom. Internalizing concepts through inquiry learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 72(10), 275-278, https://doi.org/10.1080/00098659909599406
• Braden, S., Wassell, B. A., Scantlebury, K., & Grover, A. (2016): Supporting language learners in science classrooms: insights from middle-school English language learner students. Language and Education, 30(5), 438-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1134566
• Brock-Utne, B. (2014). Language-in-Education Policies and Practices in Africa with a Special Focus on Tanzania and South Africa. In J. Zadja (Ed.), Second International Handbook on Globalisation, Education and Policy Research (pp. 615-631). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9493-0_36
• Burris, S., & Garton, B. L. (2007). Effect of instructional strategy on critical thinking and content knowledge: Using problem based learning in the secondary classroom. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(1), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2007.01106
• Bybee, R. W. (2002). Scientific inquiry, student learning, and the science curriculum: Learning science and the science of learning. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. https://doi.org/10.2505/9780873552080
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4^th Ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
• Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(3), 391-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404266386
• Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kepley, R. (2000). Engaging Minds-Learning and Teaching in a Complex World. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Dunn, C. P. (2003). Keeping taxonomy based in morphology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 270-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00094-6
• Gabrieli, P., Sane, E., & Alphonce, R. (2018). From Access to Quality Secondary Education: Developing Language Supportive Textbooks to Enhance Teaching and Learning of Biology Subject in Tanzania, Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 25(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.9734/JESBS/2018/40999
• Galabawa, J. C. J. (2006). Implications of Changing the Language of Instructions in Secondary and Tertiary Education in Tanzania. In B. Brock-Utne, Z. Desai, & M. Qorro (Eds.). Focus on Fresh Data on the Language of Instruction Debate in Tanzania and South Africa. Dar es Salaam: African Minds. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460912221011
• Hilippe, H., Brinkmann, H., Copley, R. R., Moroz, L. L., Nakano, H., Poustka, A. J., … Telford, M. J. (2011). Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella. Nature, 470, 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09676
• Jacoby, C., Heugh, J., Bax, S., & Branford-White, C. (2013). Enhancing learning through formative assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.771970
• Kellert, S. R. (1993). Values and Perceptions of Invertebrates. Conservation Biology, 7(4), 845-855. https://doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740845.x
• Kimberly, T., & Debora, A. (2004). Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning: Learning Styles and the Problem of Instructional Selection-Engaging All students in Science courses. Cell biology education, winter, 3(4), 197-201. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04- 07-0050
• Kinyota, M. (2020). The status of and challenges facing secondary science teaching in Tanzania: a focus on inquiry-based science teaching and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 42(13), 2126-2144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1813348
• Kinyota, M., Kavenuke, P. S., & Mwakabenga, R. J. (2019). Promoting teacher professional learning in Tanzanian schools: Lessons from Chinese school-based professional learning communities. Journal of Education, Humanities and Sciences, 8(1), 47-63.
• Knoch, U. (2011). Rating scales for diagnostic assessment of writing: What should they look like and where should the criteria come from? Assessing Writing, 16(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.03
• Kwan, F. (2011). Formative assessment: The one-minute paper vs. the daily quiz. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 5, 1-8.
• Lewis, B., Sarah, S., & Freedman, W. (2010). Language policy, multilingual education, and power in Rwanda. Language policy, 9, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-010-9170-7
• Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C. (2014). Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 42, 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891371
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Sage.
• Mkimbili, S. T., Tiplic, D., & Ødegaard, M. (2017). The role played by contextual challenges In practising inquiry-based science teaching in Tanzania secondary schools. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1333752
• Mitchell, S. K. (1979). Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.376
• Moate, J. (2010). The Integrated Nature of CLIL: A Sociocultural Perspective. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 38-45. Retrieved from http://www.icrj.eu/13/article4.html
• MoEST. (2015). Basic Education Statistics of Tanzania (BEST). Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
• MoEST. (2016). Basic Education Statistics of Tanzania (BEST). Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
• MoEST. (2017). Basic Education Statistics of Tanzania (BEST). Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
• MoEST. (2018). Basic Education Statistics of Tanzania (BEST). Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
• MoEST. (2019). Basic Education Statistics of Tanzania (BEST). Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.
• MoEVT. (2010). Ministry of Education and Vocational Training. O-level Biology Syllabus for Secondary school. Form I-IV.
• MoEVT. (2014a). Education and Training Policy. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Education and Vocational Training.
• MoEVT. (2014b). Basic Education Statistics in Tanzania. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Education and Vocational Training.
• Mozayan, M. R. (2015). BICS & CALP Revisited: A Critical Appraisal. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(9), 103-111.
• Ndalichako. J. L., & Komba. A. A. (2014). Students’ Subject Choice in Secondary Schools in Tanzania: A Matter of Students’ Ability and Interests or Forced Circumstances? Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.28008
• Orlich, D., C., Harder, R., J., Callahan, R., C. (2007). Teaching Strategies. A Guide to effective Instruction. Houghton: Mifflin Company.
• Ricketts, A. (2014). Preservice elementary teachers’ ideas about scientific practices. Science & Education, 23(10), 2119-2135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9709-7
• Roy-Campbell, Z. (1992). Power of pedagogy: choosing the medium on instruction in Tanzania. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
• Rubagumya, C. (2003). English Medium Primary Schools in Tanzania: A New Linguistic Market in Education? In B. Brock-Utne, Z. Desai, & M. Qorro (Eds), Language of Instruction in Tanzania and South Africa (LOITASA) (pp.149-170). Dar es Salaam: E & D Limited. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460912221005
• Schweisfurth, M. (2013). Learner-Centred Education in International Perspective: Whose Pedagogy for Whose Development? Oxford: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817438
• Semali, L. M., & Mehta (2012). Science education in Tanzania: Challenges and policy responses. International Journal of Educational Research, 53(2012), 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.012
• Shohamy, E., Gordon, C. M., & Kraemer, R. (1992). The effects of raters’ background and training of the reliability of direct writing tests. The modern Language Journal, 76(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/329895
• Swain, M. (2000). The Output Hypothesis and Beyond: Mediating Acquisition through Collaborative Dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97-114). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Thaiposri, P., & Wannapiroon, P. (2015). Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills throughTeaching and Learning by Inquiry-based Learning Activities Using Social Network and Cloud Computing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2137-2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.013
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1037/11193-000
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University.
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Toward a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605895
• Yang, H. A. (2017). Research on The Effective Questioning Strategies in Class Science Journal of Education, 54(158), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170504.16

Vancouver

David O, Venuste N. Practice in Teaching and Learning of Invertebrates: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pedagogical Language Strategies in Tanzania Secondary Schools. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(2):em1940. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9697

APA

David, O., & Venuste, N. (2021). Practice in Teaching and Learning of Invertebrates: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pedagogical Language Strategies in Tanzania Secondary Schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(2), em1940. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9697

AMA

David O, Venuste N. Practice in Teaching and Learning of Invertebrates: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pedagogical Language Strategies in Tanzania Secondary Schools. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(2), em1940. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9697

Chicago

David, Opanga, and Nsengimana Venuste. "Practice in Teaching and Learning of Invertebrates: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pedagogical Language Strategies in Tanzania Secondary Schools". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 2 (2021): em1940. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9697

Harvard

David, O., and Venuste, N. (2021). Practice in Teaching and Learning of Invertebrates: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pedagogical Language Strategies in Tanzania Secondary Schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(2), em1940. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9697

MLA

David, Opanga et al. "Practice in Teaching and Learning of Invertebrates: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pedagogical Language Strategies in Tanzania Secondary Schools". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 2, 2021, em1940. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9697