Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Andrich, D. (1988). Rasch models for measurement. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985598
• Aparicio-Landa, E., Sosa-Moguel, L., García-Almeida, G., & Avila-Vales, E. (2025). University students and professors’ reflections on an averages-based approach to the fundamental theorem of calculus. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), Article em2593. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16002
• Baartman, L. K., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. (2006). The wheel of competency assessment: Presenting quality criteria for competency assessment programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(2), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.04.006
• Beswick, K., Callingham, R., & Watson, J. (2012). The nature and development of middle school mathematics teachers’ knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 131-157.
• Birenbaum, M. (2007). Evaluating the assessment: Sources of evidence for quality assurance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.01.004
• Bloxham, S., Boyd, P., & Orr, S. (2011). Mark my words: the role of assessment criteria in UK higher education grading practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 655-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003777716
• Bond, T., Yan, Z., & Heene, M. (2020). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814698
• Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch analysis for instrument development: Why, when, and how? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), Article rm4. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050
• Callingham, R. (2015). Measurement challenges in mathematics education research. In Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 462-480). Routledge.
• Callingham, R. C., & Bond, T. G. (2006). Research in mathematics education and Rasch measurement. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217432
• Callingham, R., & Watson, J. M. (2005). Measuring statistical literacy. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6(1), 19-47.
• Day, L., Siemon, D., Callingham, R., & Seah, R. (2024). Connecting the threads: The role of multiplicative thinking in algebraic, geometrical, and statistical reasoning. Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 325-347.
• Di Nisio, R. (2010). Measure school learning through Rasch analysis: The interpretation of results. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 373-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.167
• Elizar, E., & Khairunnisak, C. (2020). An introduction to the Rasch Measurement Model: A case of mathematics education students comprehensive test. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol5no1.2020pp51-60
• Gerritsen-van Leeuwenkamp, K. J., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Kester, L. (2017). Assessment quality in tertiary education: An integrative literature review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 94-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.08.001
• Griffin, P., & Callingham, R. (2006). A 20-year study of mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 167-186.
• Illanes, M. K. G., Breda, A., Alvarado-Martínez, H., & Sala-Sebastià, G. (2025). Characterization of sub-fields of derivative problems in engineering textbooks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), Article em2591. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15987
• Johnson, H. L., Donovan, C., Knurek, R., Whitmore, K. A., & Bechtold, L. (2024). Proposing and testing a model relating students’ graph selection and graph reasoning for dynamic situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115(3), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10299-4
• Kieftenbeld, V., Natesan, P., & Eddy, C. (2011). An item response theory analysis of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(5), 443-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910391062
• Knight, P. T. (2002). Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070220000662
• Leavy, A., Bjerke, A. H., & Hourigan, M. (2023). Prospective primary teachers’ efficacy to teach mathematics: Measuring efficacy beliefs and identifying the factors that influence them. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112(3), 437-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10181-1
• Lei, P., Kong, W., Han, S., Lv, S., & Wang, X. (2022). The mathematical culture in test items of national college entrance examination in China from 1978 to 2021. Mathematics, 10(21), Article 3987. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10213987
• Linacre, J. M. (2022). Winsteps Rasch measurement v. 5.2.0.0. Winsteps. https://www.winsteps.com
• Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (2000). Winsteps. Winsteps. http://www.winsteps.com/index.htm
• Liu, X., & Boone, W. J. (2023). Advances in applications of Rasch measurement in science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28776-3
• Meijer, H., Hoekstra, R., Brouwer, J., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2020). Unfolding collaborative learning assessment literacy: A reflection on current assessment methods in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1222-1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1729696
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
• Moss, P. A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 23(2), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023002005
• Saidfudin, M., Azrilah, A., Rodzo’An, N., Omar, M., Zaharim, A., & Basri, H. (2010). Use of Rasch analysis to measure students performance in engineering education. In Proceedings of the 7^th WSEAS International Conference on engineering education (pp. 435-441). WSEAS.
• Schuwirth, L. W., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2020). A history of assessment in medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 25(5), 1045-1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-10003-0
• Siemon, D., & Callingham, R. (2019). Researching mathematical reasoning: Building evidence-based resources to support targeted teaching in the middle years. In Researching and using progressions (trajectories) in mathematics education (pp. 101-125). Brill.
• Smith Jr, E. V. (2001). Evidence for the reliability of measures and validity of measure interpretation: A Rasch measurement perspective. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2(3), 281-311.
• Tatira, B. (2025). Undergraduate students’ understanding of the application of integral calculus in kinematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), Article em2601. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16049
• Taylor, R. T., Bishop, P. R., Lenhart, S., Gross, L. J., & Sturner, K. (2020). Development of the biocalculus assessment (BCA). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19 (1), Article ar6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-10-0216
• Van Der Vleuten, C. P., & Schuwirth, L. W. (2005). Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Medical Education, 39(3), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x
• Vrikki, M., Kyriakides, L., & Dimosthenous, A. (2024). The potential of following-up inter-national large-scale assessment studies: Using PISA 2018 to develop a comprehensive model of effective teaching. Educational Research and Evaluation, 30(3), 249-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2024.2344094
• Wei, T., Chesnut, S. R., Barnard-Brak, L., Stevens, T., & Oliv´arez Jr, A. (2014). Evaluating the mathematics interest inventory using item response theory: Differential item functioning across gender and ethnicities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(8), 747-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282914540449
• Wilcox, R. R. (2011). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386983-8.00001-9
• Wright, B. D. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Measurement, Evaluation, Statistics, and Assessment Press.
• Zheng, Y., Van Vliet, F., & Jin, J. I. (2024). Case study of the use of learner-centered assessment in the math school of a large university in the United States. Educational Research and Evaluation, 30(4), 476-494. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/7gzrk

APA

Kadyrov, S., Callingham, R., Makhmutova, A., & Pinto, G. (2026). From midterm to final: Using Rasch analysis to measure growth and fairness in university calculus assessments. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(3), em2790. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18065

Vancouver

Kadyrov S, Callingham R, Makhmutova A, Pinto G. From midterm to final: Using Rasch analysis to measure growth and fairness in university calculus assessments. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(3):em2790. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18065

AMA

Kadyrov S, Callingham R, Makhmutova A, Pinto G. From midterm to final: Using Rasch analysis to measure growth and fairness in university calculus assessments. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(3), em2790. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18065

Chicago

Kadyrov, Shirali, Rosemary Callingham, Alfira Makhmutova, and Goncalo Pinto. "From midterm to final: Using Rasch analysis to measure growth and fairness in university calculus assessments". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 3 (2026): em2790. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18065

Harvard

Kadyrov, S., Callingham, R., Makhmutova, A., and Pinto, G. (2026). From midterm to final: Using Rasch analysis to measure growth and fairness in university calculus assessments. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(3), em2790. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18065

MLA

Kadyrov, Shirali et al. "From midterm to final: Using Rasch analysis to measure growth and fairness in university calculus assessments". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 3, 2026, em2790. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18065