• Akpinar, I. A. (2012). The effect of 5e learning model on pre-service science teachers’ achievement in the subject of solutions. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(2), 867-874.
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
• Bereza, N. V. (2012). “Modern trends in the development of the world and Russian information services market”. Retrieved from http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-tendentsii-razvitiya-mirovogo-i-rossiyskogo-rynka-informatsionnyh-uslug.
• Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004.
• Bokovoi, Yu. V. (2006). Peculiarities of the methodology of designing information systems for small and medium-sized businesses. Applied Informatics, 5, 3-11.
• Bordovsky, G. A. (2012). Challenges of modern education system to a schoolteacher. Vocational Education in Russia and Abroad, 6, 6-10.
• Carapina, M., Mekterovic, I., Jagušt, T., Drljevic, N., Baksa, J., Kovacevic, P., & Boticki, I. (2015). Developing a multiplatform solution for mobile learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computers in Education, 384-389. Retrieved from www.scopus.com.
• Dewey, J. (1937). Experience and education. New York: Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.1998.tb00812.x.
• Doolan, M., & Guiza, M. (2015). Towards a novel methodology for adopting blended collaborative learning solutions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning. ICEL, 2015-January 83-90. Retrieved from www.scopus.com.
• Dover, P. A., Manwani, S., & Munn, D. (2018). Creating learning solutions for executive education programs. International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.002.
• Durkin, K., Star, J. R. & Rittle, J. B. (2017). Using comparison of multiple strategies in the mathematics classroom: Lessons learned and next steps. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(4), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0853-9.
• Feldshtein, D. I. (2010). Priority directions of psychological and pedagogical research in conditions of children development significant changes. Pedagogy, 7, 3-11.
• Fiallo, J., & Gutiérrez, A. (2017). Analysis of the cognitive unity or rupture between conjecture and proof when learning to prove on a grade 10 trigonometry course. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9755-6.
• Govindarajan, K., Kumar, V. S. & Kinshuk, A. (2017). Dynamic learning path prediction - A learning analytics solution. Paper presented at the Proceedings - IEEE 8th International Conference on Technology for Education. T4E 188-193. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2016.047.
• Heider, J. S. (2015). Using digital learning solutions to address higher Education’s greatest challenges. Publishing Research Quarterly, 31(3), 183-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
• Herzog, M., Ehlert, A., & Fritz, A. (2017). Combinatorial problems in Grade 3: Influences of representation, level of abstraction and use of strategies on solving success. Journal Fur Mathematik-Didaktik, 38(2), 263-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-017-0118-8.
• Hoffmann, T. (1999). Distance learning solutions. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(6), 62-69.
• Jensen, K., & Frimodt-Møller, S. (2015). An integrated playful music learning solution. Retrieved from http://vbn.aau.dk/en/persons/kristoffer-jensen(1ff9e3d6-ce36-45e7-85fa-f8d4cc07129d)/cv.html?id=.
• 45857323 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20684-4_45.
• Kenttälä, V., Rousi, R., Kankaanranta, M., & Pänkäläinen, T. (2015). Usability challenges in digital learning solutions. Paper presented at the Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference. FIE, 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344053.
• Kvon, G. M., Lushchik, I. V., Karpenko, M. A., Zaitseva, N. A., Kulkov, A. A., Galushkin, A. A., & Yakupova, N. M. (2017). Regional investment policy: Analysis and assessment of the investment environment state. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(5), 835-853. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejac.2017.00215a.
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Retrieved from: http://qvole.org/comm146/undergrdpgs/plee1/pris/Postings/Entries/2013/3/16_Eventology(WI_13)_files/lave.pdf https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1994.21.4.02a00340.
• Matad, N. A., Srinivasa, K. G., & Fernandes, L. (2016). Vidhya sangam: A cost-effective video learning solution for class-room and students personal use. Paper presented at the ICCE 2016 - 24th International Conference on Computers in Education: Think Global Act Local - Workshop Proceedings, 316-321. Retrieved from www.scopus.com.
• Molnar, M. (2014). Richard Culatta: Five Ways Technology Can Close Equity Gaps. Retrieved on September 21, 2015, from http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/marketplacek12/2014/11/richard_culatta_five_ways_technology.
• _can_close_equity_gaps.
• Niemelä, P., Isomöttönen, V., & Lipponen, L. (2016). Successful design of learning solutions being situation aware. Education and Information Technologies, 21(1), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9311-2.
• OECD (2015), Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en.
• Payne, A. M., Stephenson, J. E., Morris, W. B., Tempest, H. G., Mileham, A. & Griffin, D. K. (2009). The use of an e-learning constructivist solution in workplace learning. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(3), 548-553. https://doi.org/10.1145/1362550.1362577.
• Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education. (2017). National Education Technology Plan Update. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf.
• Scanlon, M., & Buckingham, D. (2004). Home learning and the educational marketplace. Oxford Review of Education, 30(2), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498042000215575.
• Shaidullina, A. R., Krylov, D. A., Sadovaya, V. V., Yunusova, G. R., Glebov, S. O., Masalimova, A. R., & Korshunova, I. V. (2015). Model of Vocational School, High School and Manufacture Integration in the Regional System of Professional Education. Review of European Studies, 7(1), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v7n1p63.
• Sommer, T., Bach, U., Richert, A., & Jeschke, S. (2014). A web-based recommendation system for engineering education e-learning solutions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning. ICEL, 169-175. Retrieved from www.scopus.com. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2014.0309049.
• Spitzer, B. & Aronson, J. (2015). Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12067.
• Swacha, J. (2017). Exercise solution check specification language for interactive programming learning environments. Paper presented at the OpenAccess Series in Informatics, 6, 5610.4230. https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.SLATE.2017.6.
• Trunovich, A. S., & Shlygin A. S. (2008). Competence approach in the management of organization’s human resources. Statistics and economics, 2, 263-275. Retrieved from http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kompetentnostn-yy-podhod-v-upravlenii-chelovecheskimi-resursami-organizatsii.
• Viel, C. C., Rodrigues, K. R., Teixeira, C. A., & Pimentel, M. G. (2015). Design solutions for interactive multi-video multimedia learning objects. Learning and Collaboration Technologies, 10, 160-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_16.
• Vinogradova, E. Yu., & Galimova, A. I. (2017). Principles of a corporate information system formation for implementation at Russian enterprises. Izvestiya Ural State University of Economics and Management, 2(70), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.29141/2073-1019-2017-14-2-10.
• Zolotov, E. (2013). By a wave of a wand. Business Journal, 3(204), 50-54.

Vancouver

Utemov VV, Khusainova RM, Sergeeva MG, Shestak VA. Full Packaged Learning Solutions for Studying Mathematics at School. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(12):em1619. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95122

APA

Utemov, V. V., Khusainova, R. M., Sergeeva, M. G., & Shestak, V. A. (2018). Full Packaged Learning Solutions for Studying Mathematics at School. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1619. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95122

AMA

Utemov VV, Khusainova RM, Sergeeva MG, Shestak VA. Full Packaged Learning Solutions for Studying Mathematics at School. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(12), em1619. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95122

Chicago

Utemov, Vyacheslav V., Rezeda M. Khusainova, Marina G. Sergeeva, and Victor A. Shestak. "Full Packaged Learning Solutions for Studying Mathematics at School". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 12 (2018): em1619. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95122

Harvard

Utemov, V. V., Khusainova, R. M., Sergeeva, M. G., and Shestak, V. A. (2018). Full Packaged Learning Solutions for Studying Mathematics at School. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1619. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95122

MLA

Utemov, Vyacheslav V. et al. "Full Packaged Learning Solutions for Studying Mathematics at School". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 12, 2018, em1619. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/95122