• Altun, M. (2006). Matematik öğretiminde gelişmeler. Uludag Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 223–238.
• Balay, R. (2004). Globalization, information society and education. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 37(2), 61–82.
• Berlin, D., & White, A. (2010). Preservice mathematics and science teachers in an integrated teacher preparation program for grades 7–12: A 3-year study of attitudes and perceptions related to integration. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 97–115. doi:10.1007/s10763-009-9164-0
• Besselaar, V. P., & Heimeriks, G. (2001). Disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary: Concepts and indicators. 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics-ISSI2001, Sydney.
• Cosentino, C. (2008). The impact of integrated programming on student attitude and achievement in grade 9 academic mathematics and science (Unpublished master's thesis). Brock University, Ontario.
• Costu, S., Arslan, S., Çatlioglu, H., & Birgin, O. (2009). Perspectives of elementary school teachers and their students about relating and contextualizing in mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1692–1696. doi:16/j.sbspro.2009.01.300
• Czerniak, C. M. (2007). Interdisciplinary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 537–550). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
• Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
• Drake, S. M. (2007). Creating standards-based integrated curriculum: aligning curriculum, content, assessment, and instruction (2nd ed.). Ontorio: Corwin Press.
• Fogarty, R. (1991). Ten ways to integrate the curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 61–65.
• Frykholm, J., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction: Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3), 127 – 141.
• Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., & Nowotny, H. (1997). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE.
• Gokcek, T., & Baki, A. (2013). Turkish Mathematics Teachers‘ Concerns about the Curriculum Reform in the First Year of Implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 177– 190.
• Guo, Y. (2005). Asia‘s educational edge - Current achievements in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, China, and India. Maryland: Lexington Books.
• Hoaclander, G. (1999). Integrating academic and vocational curriculum: Why is theory so hard to practice? Centerpoint, 7. Retrieved from http://vocserve.berkeley.edu/CenterPoint/CP7/ CP7.html
• Huntley, M. A. (1998). Design and implementation of a framework for defining integrated mathematics and science education. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 320 –327.
• Hurley, M. M. (2001). Reviewing integrated science and mathematics: The search for evidence and definitions from new perspectives. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 259 – 268.
• Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Design options for an integrated curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Kaya, D., Akpınar, E., & Gökkurt, Ö. (2006). İlköğretim fen derslerinde matematik tabanlı konuların öğrenilmesine fen-matematik entegrasyonunun etkisi. Bilim, Eğitim ve Düşünce Dergisi, 6(4).
• Kleiman, G. M. (1991). Mathematics across the curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 48–51.
• Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, Michigan: Wayne State University Press.
• Klein, J. T. (2005). Integrative learning and interdisciplinary studies. Peer Review, 7(4), 8–10.
• Klein, J. T. (2006). A platform for a shared discourse of interdisciplinary education. Journal of Social Science Education, 5(2), 10–18.
• Kysilka, M. L. (1998). Understanding integrated curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 9(2), 197-209.
• Lehman, J.R (1994). Integrating science and mathematics: Perceptions of preservice and practicing elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 94(2), 58-64.
• Loepp, F. L. (1999). Models of curriculum integration. Journal of Technology Studies, 25(2), 21–25.
• Lonning, R. A., & DeFranco, T. C. (1997). Integration of science and mathematics: A theoretical model. School Science and Mathematics, 97(4), 212–215.
• McBride, J. W., & Silverman, F. L. (1991). Integrating elementary/middle school science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 91(7), 285-292.
• Ministry of National Education. (2011). Matematik dersi öğretim programı ve kılavuzu: 9–12. sınıflar [Mathematics curriculum and manual: Grades 9–12]. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
• Mupanduki, B. T. (2009). The effectiveness of a standardsbased integrated chemistry and mathematics curriculum on improving the students achievement in chemistry for high school students in southern california (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Azusa Pasific University, California.
• NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards for States, by States: Volume 2: Appendixes. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
• Nicolescu, B. (1999). The transdisciplinary evolution of learning. Paris, France: CIRET. Office of P-16: The University System of Georgia P-16 Department.
• Numanoğlu, G. (1999). Bilgi toplumu-eğitim-yeni kimlikler-II: Bilgi toplumu ve eğitimde yeni kimlikler. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 32, (1-2), 341- 350.
• Paykoç, F., Mengi, B., Kamay, P. O., Onkol, P., Ozgür, B., Pilli, O., & Şahinkayası, H. M. (2004). What are the major curriculum issues? The use of mindmapping as a brainstorming exercise. Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping (Vol. 2, pp. 293–296).
• Robitaille, D., & Dirks, M. (1982). Models for the mathematics curriculum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2(3), 3-21.
• Satchwell, R. E., & Loepp, F. L. (2002). Designing and implementing an integrated mathematics,science, and technology curriculum for the middle school. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3).
• Wicklein, R. C, & Schell, J. W. (1995). Case studies of multidisciplinary approaches to integrating mathematics, science and technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 6(2), 59–77.
• Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2009). Research methods in education (9th ed.). MA: Pearson Education.

APA

Kim, M., & Aktan, T. (2014). How to Enlarge the Scope of the Curriculum Integration of Mathematics and Science (CIMAS): A Delphi Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1115a

Vancouver

Kim M, Aktan T. How to Enlarge the Scope of the Curriculum Integration of Mathematics and Science (CIMAS): A Delphi Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(5):455-69. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1115a

AMA

Kim M, Aktan T. How to Enlarge the Scope of the Curriculum Integration of Mathematics and Science (CIMAS): A Delphi Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(5), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1115a

Chicago

Kim, Minkee, and Tugba Aktan. "How to Enlarge the Scope of the Curriculum Integration of Mathematics and Science (CIMAS): A Delphi Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2014 10 no. 5 (2014): 455-469. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1115a

Harvard

Kim, M., and Aktan, T. (2014). How to Enlarge the Scope of the Curriculum Integration of Mathematics and Science (CIMAS): A Delphi Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), pp. 455-469. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1115a

MLA

Kim, Minkee et al. "How to Enlarge the Scope of the Curriculum Integration of Mathematics and Science (CIMAS): A Delphi Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 10, no. 5, 2014, pp. 455-469. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1115a