In-service Teachers’ Implementation and
Understanding of STEM
Project Based Learning

Sunyoung Han; Bugrahan Yalvac; Mary M. Capraro; Robert M. Capraro

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a

In-service Teachers’ Implementation and Understanding of STEM Project Based Learning

Full Text (PDF)

Sunyoung Han ¹ ^* , Bugrahan Yalvac ², Mary M. Capraro ³, Robert M. Capraro ³

More Detail

¹ Sungkyunkwan University, KOREA² Texas A&M University, USA³ Aggie STEM & Texas A&M University, USA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

In this study, we discussed the participating teachers‟ implementation and understanding of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL). A research team at a STEM center systematically offered professional development activities to 92 teachers in an urban school district in the southern U.S. To investigate the teachers‟ implementation and understanding of the STEM PBL pedagogy, we conducted a collective case study with five teachers. Study data included interviews, in-class observations, and lesson plans designed and implemented by the teachers. The results of this study indicated that the PD sessions were effective in communicating several important concepts about STEM PBL. Nevertheless, our observations revealed that five teachers‟ classroom enactments did not necessarily convey their understanding of STEM PBL.

Keywords

professional development
STEM education
project based learning
case study

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2015, 63-76

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a

Publication date: 16 Dec 2015

Article Views: 9796

Article Downloads: 6424

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Barron B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., John, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., …The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271-311. doi:10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Capraro, M. M. (2013). Interdisciplinary STEM project-based learning. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro & J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM Project-based learning: An integrated science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 47-54). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_6
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Scheurich, J. J., Jones, M., Morgan, J., Huggins, K., S., Corlu, S., Younes, R., & Han. S. Y. (2014, in press). Impact of sustained professional development in STEM PBL on outcome measures in a diverse urban district. Journal of Educational Research.
Capraro, R. M., & Slough, S. W. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro & J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM Project-based learning: An integrated science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 1-6). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_1
Choy, S. P., Chen, S., & Bugarin, R. (2006). Teacher professional development in 1999-2000: What teachers, principals, and district staff report (No. NCES 2006-305). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Centre for Education Statistics.
Corlu, M. S. (2012). A pathway to STEM education: Investigating pre-service mathematics and science teachers at Turkish universities in terms of their understanding of mathematics used in science (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166-173. doi:10.1177/0022487100051003002
Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us? American Educational Research Journal 31(9), 13-25. doi:10.3102/0013189X031009013
Denton, J. J., Davis, T. J., Smith, B. L., Beason, L., & Strader, R. A. (2005, February). The development and implementation of an online professional development model for pre-service teachers education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers‟ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181-199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
Duff, R. E., Brown, M. H., & van Scoy, I. J. (1995). Reflection and self-evaluation: Keys to professional development. Young Children, 50(4), 81-88.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Erickson, G., Brandes, G. M., Mitchell, I., & Mitchell, J. (2005). Collaborative teacher learning: Findings from two professional development projects. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(7), 787-798. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.018
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
Garet, M. S., Wayne, A. J., Stancavage, F., Taylor, J., Eaton, M., Walters, K., . . . Doolittle, F. (2011). Middle school mathematics PD impact study: Findings after the second year of implementation. Executive summary. (NCEE 2011-4025). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from http://libezproxy.tamu.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.proque st.com/docview/870286300?accountid=7082
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Goldhaber, D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching. Education Next, 2(1), 50-55.
Guskey, T. R. (2003). Analyzing lists of the characteristics of effective professional development to promote visionary leadership. NASSP Bulletin, 87(637). doi:10.1177/019263650308763702
Han, S. Y., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014, in press). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s10763- 014-9526-0
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving inservice training: The messages of research. Educational Leadership, 37(5), 379-385.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing.
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918). The project method. Teachers College Record, 19, 319-335.
McLeskey, J. (2011). Supporting improved practice for special education teachers. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 24(1), 26-35.
Newell, R. (2003). Passion for learning: How project-based learning meets the needs of 21st-century students. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press.
Ozel, S. (2013). Who, when, and where. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro & J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM Project-based learning: An integrated science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) approach (pp. 41-46). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Roesken, B. (2011). Hidden dimensions in the professional development of mathematics teachers: In-service education for and with teachers. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense. doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-433-1
Slough, S., & Milam, J. (2013).Theoretical framework for the design of STEM project-based learning. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. Morgan (Eds.) Project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach (2nd Edition, pp. 15-28). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stearns, L. M., Morgan, J., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2012). The development of a teacher observation instrument for PBL classroom instruction. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13(3), 25-34.
Steipen, W. J., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 51, 25-28.
Texas Education Agency. (2011). Selected sections from Texas Education Code (TEC) and Texas Administrative Code (TAC). [PDF document]. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index4.aspx?id=8327&menu _id=2147483659
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.
van Es, E. A. (2011). Examining the development of a teacher learning community: The case of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2), 182-192. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.005
Ward, J. D., & Lee, C. L. (2002). A review of problem-based learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 20(1), 16-26.
Wayne, A. J., & Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122. doi:10.3102/00346543073001089
Whitaker, S., Kinzie, M., Kraft-Sayer, M., Mashburn, A., & Pianta, R. (2007). Use and evaluation of web-based professional development services across participant levels of support. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(6), 379-386. doi:10.1007/s10643-006-0142-7
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

How to cite this article

APA

Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service Teachers’ Implementation and Understanding of STEM Project Based Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a

Vancouver

Han S, Yalvac B, Capraro MM, Capraro RM. In-service Teachers’ Implementation and Understanding of STEM Project Based Learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(1):63-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a

AMA

Han S, Yalvac B, Capraro MM, Capraro RM. In-service Teachers’ Implementation and Understanding of STEM Project Based Learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a

Chicago

Han, Sunyoung, Bugrahan Yalvac, Mary M. Capraro, and Robert M. Capraro. "In-service Teachers’ Implementation and Understanding of STEM Project Based Learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 1 (2015): 63-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a

Harvard

Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., and Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service Teachers’ Implementation and Understanding of STEM Project Based Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), pp. 63-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a

MLA

Han, Sunyoung et al. "In-service Teachers’ Implementation and Understanding of STEM Project Based Learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2015, pp. 63-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a