Interaction, Structure, Social Presence, and Satisfaction in Online Learning

Mehmet Barış Horzum

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a

Full Text (PDF)

Mehmet Barış Horzum ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Sakarya University, TURKEY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

There have been various studies about interaction, structure, social presence and satisfaction in online learning; however, there is not any research which represents the relationships among these concepts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship among these variables. The population of the study is involved 205 university students who enrolled bachelor degree completion program at the Ankara University. Structural equation modeling was used to test hypothesizes. The results of this study indicated that there is a negative correlation between the course structure and interaction dimensions defined by Moore in transactional distance theory. Secondly, online students‟ social presence was predicted positively by interaction and negatively by course structure. Furthermore, online learning satisfaction was predicted positively by social presence. Students are most satisfied when their social presences are high in the online learning.

Keywords

transactional distance
course structure
interaction
social presence
satisfaction

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, Volume 11, Issue 3, 2015, 505-512

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a

Publication date: 16 Jun 2017

Article Views: 12673

Article Downloads: 8346

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Ali, A., Ramay, M. I., & Shahzad, M. (2011). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University (AIOU) Islamabad, Pakistan. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 12(2), 114-127.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States. Retrieved December 31, 2013, from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/ pdf/learningondemand.pdf.
Burgess, J. V. (2006). Transactional distance theory and student satisfaction with web-based distance learning courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of West Florida.
Chen, Y. J. (2001). Transactional distance in World Wide Web learning environment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International Journal (IETI), 38(4), 327-338.
Chou, S. W., & Min, H. T. (2009). The impact of media on collaborative learning in virtual settings: The perspective of social construction. Computers & Education, 52(2), 417–431.
Cicciarelli, M. S. (2008). A description of online instructors use of design theory. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 4(1), 25-32.
Cobb, S. C. (2009). Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3), 241-254.
Delfino, M., & Manca, S. (2007). The expression of social presence through the use of figurative language in a web-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2190-2211.
Demir Kaymak, Z., & Horzum, M. B. (2013). Relationship between online learning readiness and structure and ınteraction of online learning students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1783-1797.
Force, D. (2004). Relationships among transactional distance variables in asynchronous computer conferences: A correlational study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta.
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2/3), 87-105.
Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1), 1-17.
Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 1-11.
Gunawerdana, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
Hopper, D. A. (2000). Learner characteristics, life circumstances, and transactional distance in a distance education setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Horzum, M. B. (2007). İnternet tabanlı eğitimde etkileşimsel uzaklığın öğrenci başarısı, doyumu ve öz-yeterlik algısına etkisi [The effect of transactional distance on students’ achievement, satisfaction and self efficacy in internet based education]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ankara University Educational Science Institute, Ankara.
Horzum, M. B., & Çakır, Ö. (2009). Çevrim içi teknolojilere yönelik öz-yeterlik algısı ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the online technologies self-efficacy scale]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(3), 1327-1356.
Horzum, M. B. (2011). Developing transactional distance scale and examining transactional distance perception of blended learning students in terms of different variables. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(3), 1571-1587.
Huang, H. M. (2000). Moore’s theory of transactional distance in an online mediated environment: student perception on the online courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle.
Internet World Stats (2013). Internet World Stats: Usage and Population Statistics. Retrieved January 07, 2014, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/.
Joyce, K. M., & Brown, A. (2009). Enhancing social presence in online learning: Mediation strategies applied to social networking tools. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(4). Retrieved July 27, 2011, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter124/jo yce124 .html.
Jung, I., Seonghee, C., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effect of different type of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web based instruction. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162
Kanuka, H., Collett, D., & Caswell, C. (2002). University instructor perceptions of the use of asynchronous textbased discussion in distance courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 151–167.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Lee, H. J., & Rha, I. (2009). Influence of structure and interaction on student achievement and satisfaction in web-based distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 372–382.
Lowell, N. O. (2004). An investigation of factors contributing to perceived transactional distance in an online setting. Published doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado.
Lynch, M. M. (2002). The online educator: A guide to creating the virtual classroom. London: Routledge Falmer Taylor & Francis Group.
Moore, M. G. & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systematic view of online learning (3rd Ed.). Belmont, VA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
Moore, M. G. (1991). Editorial: Distance education theory. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 1-6.
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principle of distance education (p. 22-38). London: Routledge.
Murphy, E., & Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2008). Revisiting transactional distance theory in a context of web-based high-school distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 1-14.
Mykota, D., & Duncan, R. (2007). Learner characteristics as predictors of online social presence. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(1), 157-170.
Olpak, Y. S., & Kılıç Çakmak, E. (2009). E-öğrenme ortamları için sosyal bulunuşluk ölçeğinin uyarlama çalışması. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, IV(I), 142-160.
Palmer, S. R., & Holt, D. M. (2009). Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 101-113.
Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students‟ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
Sandoe, C. (2005). Measuring transactional distance in online courses: The structure component. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of South Florida.
Schermelleh-Engel, K. Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23- 74.
Shin, N. (2003). Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 69–86.
Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overtoom, C., & Wheaton, J. E. (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 105-118.
Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.
Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2003). Structural equation modeling. In J. A. Schinka, & W. F. Velicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Volume 2. Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 607-634). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley
Weinel, M., Bannert, M., Zumbach, J., Hoppe, H. U., & Malzahn, N. (2011). A closer look on social presence as a causing factor in computer-mediated collaboration. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 513-521.
Wise, E., Chang, J., Duffy, T., & del Vale, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247-271.

How to cite this article

APA

Horzum, M. B. (2015). Interaction, Structure, Social Presence, and Satisfaction in Online Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), 505-512. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a

Vancouver

Horzum MB. Interaction, Structure, Social Presence, and Satisfaction in Online Learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(3):505-12. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a

AMA

Horzum MB. Interaction, Structure, Social Presence, and Satisfaction in Online Learning. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(3), 505-512. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a

Chicago

Horzum, Mehmet Barış. "Interaction, Structure, Social Presence, and Satisfaction in Online Learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 3 (2015): 505-512. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a

Harvard

Horzum, M. B. (2015). Interaction, Structure, Social Presence, and Satisfaction in Online Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), pp. 505-512. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a

MLA

Horzum, Mehmet Barış "Interaction, Structure, Social Presence, and Satisfaction in Online Learning". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 3, 2015, pp. 505-512. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a