Secondary school mathematics teaching evaluations by students: A report card for the mathematics teacher

Eric Machisi

doi:10.29333/ejmste/12774

Full Text (PDF)

Eric Machisi ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ University of South Africa, Pretoria, SOUTH AFRICA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study presents findings from multiple case studies undertaken in three secondary schools in South Africa’s Limpopo Province. The goal was to collect input from students on mathematics teaching practices in their classrooms. The study included a self-selected sample of eleven grade 12 students. Unstructured individual interviews and students’ written reports were used to collect data, which was then analyzed based on emerging themes. Students expressed genuine concerns about teachers’ lesson preparation, subject and pedagogical knowledge, classroom management, attention given to slow learners, quality of classwork and homework tasks given to students, exam preparation, class attendance, and utilization of contact time, teachers’ attitudes, and their emotional intelligence, among others. Based on the study’s findings, the author suggests that student evaluation of teaching be used in secondary schools to help teachers reflect on their teaching practices in order to create learning environments that most students would enjoy.

Keywords

students
evaluation
teaching
mathematics
reflection

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2023, Volume 19, Issue 1, Article No: em2211

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12774

Publication date: 01 Jan 2023

Article Views: 2058

Article Downloads: 938

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Akpotu, N. E., & Oghuvbu, E. P. (2004). Performance appraisal of the Nigerian secondary school teachers: The student perspectives. ISEA, 32(3), 44-57.
Almutairi, T. S., & Shraid, N. S. (2021). Teacher evaluation by different internal evaluators: Head of departments, teachers themselves, peers, and students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 588. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20838
ArapToo, F. (2020). Best ways to teach mathematics to slow learners. teacher.co.ke. https://teacher.co.ke/best-ways-to-teach-mathematics-to-slow-learners/
Arreola, R. A. (2007). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A guide to designing, building, and operating large-scale faculty evaluation systems. Anker.
Aykac, M., Aslandag, B., & Kogce, D. (2020). The examination of prospective mathematics teachers’ perceptions of lifelong learning competencies. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 8(16), 705-719. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.751476
Bakx, A., Koopman, M., de Kruijf, J., & den Brok, P. (2015). Primary school pupils’ views of characteristics of good primary school teachers: An exploratory, open approach for investigating pupils’ perceptions. Teachers and Teaching, 21(5), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.995477
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Bertram, C. A., Mthiyane, C. C., & Naidoo, J. (2021). The tension between curriculum coverage and quality learning: The experiences of South African teachers. International Journal of Educational Development, 81(4), 102353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102353
Bhawna, G., & Gobind, N. A. (2015). Research methodology and approaches. IOSR Journal of Research and Methods in Education, 5(3), 48-51.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp. 18-40). Routledge.
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Cambridge Assessment International Education. (n. d). What is reflective practice? Cambridge Assessment International Education. https://www.cambridge-community.org.uk/professional-development/gswrp/index.html
Carolan, C. M., Forbat, L., & Smith, A. (2016). Developing the DESCARTE model: The design of case study research in health care. Qualitative Health Research, 26(5), 626-639. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315602488
Cashin, W. E. (1999). Student ratings of teaching: Uses and misuses. In P. Seldin, & Associates (Eds.), Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions (pp. 25-44). Anker.
Chandra, Y., & Shang, L. (2019). Qualitative research: An overview. In Y. Chandra, & L. Shang (Eds.), Qualitative research using R: A systematic approach (pp. 1-19). Springer.
Chauhan, R. S. (2022). Unstructured interviews: are they really all that bad? Human Resource Development International, 25(4), 474-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2019.1603019
Chua, V. G. (2020). A meta-synthesis of studies on deficiencies and affordances in mathematical knowledge for teaching. Araneta Research Journal (Indagatio), 43(1), 15-21.
Constantinou, C., & Wijnen-Meijer, M. (2022). Student evaluations of teaching and the development of a comprehensive measure of teaching effectiveness for medical schools. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03148-6
Dabell, J. (2021, June 23). Never leave a class unattended. Professional Standards. https://johndabell.com/2021/06/23/never-leave-a-class-unattended/
Debroy, A., Ingole, A., & Mudey, A. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions on SET as a tool for faculty development and quality assurance in medical education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8(218), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_47_19
Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850-2861. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560
El-Sayed, M., Simon, M. A., El-Wasify, M., & Nambier, V. (2018). Medical students perception of teaching evaluation and feedback: A study at Oman Medical College. Middle East Current Psychiatry, 25(3), 131-134. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XME.0000534676.55060.8d
Elstad, E., Lejonberg, E., & Christophersen, K.-A. (2017). Student evaluation of high-school teaching: Which factors are associated with teachers’ perception of the usefulness of being evaluated? Journal for Educational Research Online, 9(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:12968
Farr, M. (2018). Arbitration decision on student evaluations of teaching applauded by faculty. University Affairs. http://www.universityaffairs/news.article/arbitration-decision-on-student-evaluations-of-teaching
Ferlazzo, L. (2019). Students evaluate teachers. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-response-the-value-of-having-students-evaluate-teachers/2019/04
Gannon, K. (2018). In defense (sort of) of student evaluations of teaching. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://www.chronicle.com/article/In-Defense-sort-of-of-/24335.
Gatwiri, K., Anderson, L., & Townsend-Cross, M. (2021). Teaching should not feel like a combat sport: How teaching evaluations are weaponized against minoritized academics. Race Ethnicity and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2021.1890560
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford Further Education Unit.
Halkias, D., & Neubert, M. (2020). Extension of theory in leadership and management studies using the multiple-case study design. International Leadership Journal, 12(2), 48-73. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3586256
Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235
Hoffman, M. (1992). How am I doing? The importance of evaluation in the classroom. English Journal (High School Edition), 81(4), 79-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/819939
Hornstein, H. A. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1304016. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304016
Jagersma, J., & Parsons, J. (2011). Empowering students as active participants in curriculum. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 8(2), 114-121.
Joshua, M. T., & Joshua, A. M. (2004). Attitude of Nigerian secondary school teachers to student evaluation of teachers. Teacher Development, 8(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530400200214
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
King, L. (2007). SET–the student evaluation of teaching staff-in secondary education. taolearn.com. https://taolearn.com/wp-content/uploads/articles/article17.pdf
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
Lafee, S. (2014). Students evaluating teachers. School Administrator, 3(71), 17-25.
Learning Liftoff. (2018). Controversial school discipline: Collective and corporal punishment in schools. Learning Liftoff. https://www.learningliftoff.com/collective-and-corporal-punishment-in-schools/
McLeod, S. A. (2014). The interview research method. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/interviews.html
Mertler, C. A. (1997). Students as stakeholders in teacher evaluation; teacher perceptions of a formative feedback model [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of Mid-Western Educational Research Association.
Nasheeda, A., Abdullah, H. B., Krauss, S. E., & Ahmed, N. B. (2019). Transforming transcripts into stories: A multimethod approach to narrative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919856797
Netcom. (2017, May). Importance of a flexible teaching approach. Netcom92. https://www.netcom92.com/2017/05/importance-of-flexible-teaching
Ngesi, N., Landa, N., Madikiza, N., Cekiso, M. P., Tshotsho, B., & Walters, L. M. (2018). Use of mobile phones as supplementary teaching and learning tools to learners in South Africa. Reading & Writing, 9(1), a190. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v9i1.190
Ogbonnaya, U. I. (2019). The reliability of students’ evaluation of teaching at secondary school level. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77(1), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/19.77.97
Okoth, T. A. (2016). Challenges of implementing a top-down curriculum innovation in English language teaching: Perspectives of form III English language teachers in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 169-177.
Okoye, K., Arrona-Palacios, A., Camacho-Zuñiga, C., Hammout, N., Nakamura, E. L., Escamilla, J., & Hosseini, S. (2020). Impact of students evaluation of teaching: A text analysis of the teachers qualities by gender. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(49), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00224-z
Pan, G., Shankararaman, V., Koh, K., & Gan, S. (2021). Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 100501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100501
Parker, J. D., Saklofske, D. H., Wood, L. M., & Collin, T. (2009). The role of emotional intelligence in education. In C. Stough, D. H. Saklofske, & J. D. Parker (Eds.), Assessing emotional intelligence: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 239-255). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88370-0_13
Pearson, M. J., Stephens, D., York, P., Armbrecht, T., Gunn, J. L., & Fruhling, Z. (2022). Students evaluating teachers: What educators need to know. Resilient Educator. https://resilienteducator.com/classroom-resources/students-evaluating-teachers-what-educators-need-to-know/
Peck, R. F., Blattstein, A., & Fox, R. (1978). Student evaluation of teaching: A multivariate validation study [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association.
Pereira, A., & van Prooijen, J. W. (2018). Why we sometimes punish the innocent: The role of group entitativity in collective punishment. PLoS ONE, 13(5), e0196852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196852
Phelps, G., & Howell, H. (2016). Assessing mathematical knowledge for teaching: The role of teaching context. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(1), 52-70. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1365
Pineda, P., & Steinhardt, I. (2020). The debate on student evaluations of teaching: Global convergence confronts higher education traditions. Teaching in Higher Education, 51(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863351
Richardson, A. G., & Thomas, A. A. (1989). Characteristics of the effective teacher as perceived by pupils and teachers: A Caribbean case study [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Sabah, A. A. (2020, October). Importance of planning in teaching mathematics. University of Sargodha.
Sarzynski, T. (2018). Students should evaluate their teachers. Student Voices. https://mystudentvoices.com/students-should-evaluate-their-teachers-8aadea8cb58b
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2022). Why are learning and teaching mathematics so difficult? In M. Danesi (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive mathematics (pp. 1-35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_10-1
Schön, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Singh, V. P. (2004). Education of the slow learner. Sarup.
Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Expanding approaches for research: Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), 26-28.
Stroh, L. (1991). High school student evaluation of student teachers: How do they compare with professionals? Illinois School Research and Development, 27(2), 81-92.
Sudhakar, J. (2018). Why should teachers adopt a lifelong learning mindset? https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-should-teachers-adopt-lifelong-learning-mindset-future-sudhakar
The Institute for Health and Human Potential. (2019). What is emotional intelligence? learning@ihhp.com. https://www.ihhp.com/meaning-of-emotional-intelligence/
Thompson, K. (2016). Interviews in social research: advantages and disadvantages. Revise Sociology. https://revisesociology.com/2016/01/23/interviews-in-social-research-advantages-and-disadvantages/
Thompson, K. (2017). Teacher labelling and the self-fulfilling prophecy. Revise Sociology. https://revisesociology.com/2017/11/01/labelling-self-fulfilling-prophecy-education/
Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2020). Planning qualitative research: Design and decision making for new researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211052557
Trochim, W., Donnelly, J., & Arora, K. (2015). Research methods: The essential knowledge base. Cengage Learning.
Ubong, B., & Okpor, M. O. (2019). Student assessment of teachers (SAT): Towards a basket of approaches. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(2), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v15i2.7558
Werrell, B. (2021). Understanding multiple intelligences and learning styles. Connections Academy. https://www.connectionsacademy.com/support/resources/article/learning-styles-multiple-intelligences/
Yale University. (2021). Reflective teaching. Poorvu Center. https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/ReflectiveTeaching
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE.
Yusha’u, M. A. (2012). Teaching slow learners in mathematics: Yugal remediation model as alternative method. Sokoto Educational Review, 13(2), 108-1023. https://doi.org/10.35386/ser.v13i2.191
Yusof, A. A., Hamid, N. H., & Othman, Z. S. (2021). The effects of a multiple solution method in mathematics learning for secondary schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1988(1), 012048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1988/1/012048
Zhang, J., Zhao, N., & Kong, Q. P. (2019). The relationship between math anxiety and math performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1613. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613
Zhang, W., Qin, S., Jin, H., Deng, J., & Wu, L. (2017). An empirical study on student evaluations of teaching based on data mining. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5837-5845. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01033a

How to cite this article

APA

Machisi, E. (2023). Secondary school mathematics teaching evaluations by students: A report card for the mathematics teacher. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), em2211. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12774

Vancouver

Machisi E. Secondary school mathematics teaching evaluations by students: A report card for the mathematics teacher. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(1):em2211. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12774

AMA

Machisi E. Secondary school mathematics teaching evaluations by students: A report card for the mathematics teacher. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(1), em2211. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12774

Chicago

Machisi, Eric. "Secondary school mathematics teaching evaluations by students: A report card for the mathematics teacher". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 1 (2023): em2211. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12774

Harvard

Machisi, E. (2023). Secondary school mathematics teaching evaluations by students: A report card for the mathematics teacher. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), em2211. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12774

MLA

Machisi, Eric "Secondary school mathematics teaching evaluations by students: A report card for the mathematics teacher". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 1, 2023, em2211. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12774