• AAAS (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS Publications.
• Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
• Beyerebach, B. & Smith, J. (1990). Using a computerized concept mapping program to assess preservice teachers’ thinking about effective teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 961-971.
• Bloom, B. (1969). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: McKay
• BouJaoude, S. & Barakat, H. (2000). Secondary school students' difficulties with stoichiometry. School Science Review, 81, 91-98.
• Brandt, L., Elen, J., Hellemans, J., Heerman, L., Couwenberg, I., Volckaert, L., & Morisse, H. (2001). The impact of concept mapping and visualization on the learning of secondary school chemistry students. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1303-1313.
• Francisco, J., Nicoll, G., & Trautmann, M. (1998). Integrating multiple teaching methods into a general chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 210-213.
• Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of chemical Education, 76, 548-554.
• Horton, P., McConney, A., Gallo, M., Woods, A, Senn, G., Hamelin, D. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77, 95-111.
• Johnstone, A., & Otis, K. (2006). Concept mapping in problem based learning: A cautionary tale. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7, 84.95.
• Kinchin, I., Hay, D. & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42, 43-57.
• Lehman, J., Carter, C., & Kahle, J. (1985). Concept mapping, Vee mapping, and achievement: Results of a field study with black high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 663-673.
• Liu, X. (2004). Using concept mapping for assessing and promoting relational conceptual change. Science Education, 88, 373-396.
• Markham, K., Mintzes, J., & Jones, M. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 91- 101.
• Markow, P., & Lonning, R. (1998). Usefulness of concept maps in college chemistry laboratories: Students’ perceptions and effects on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1015-1029.
• McClure, J., Sonak, B., & Suen, H. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 475 - 492.
• Moore, J. (1989). Tooling up for the 21st century. Journal of Chemical Education, 66, 15-19.
• Nakhleh, M. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 191-196.
• Nicoll, G., Francisco, J., & Nakhleh, M. (2001). An investigation of the value of using concept maps in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 1111- 1117.
• Novak, J. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
• Novak, J., & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 117-153.
• Ogawa, M. (1998). Under the noble flag of 'developing scientific and technological literacy. Studies in Science Education, 31, 102-111.
• Starr, M. & Krajcik, J. (1990). Concept mapping as a heuristic for science curriculum development: Towards improvement in process and product. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 987-1000.
• Stensvold, M. & Wilson, J. (1992). Using concept maps as a tool to apply chemistry concepts to laboratory activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 230-232.
• Stewart, J., Van Kirk, J., & Rowell, R. (1979). Concept maps: A tool for use in biology teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 41, 171-175.
• Wapner, S. (1986). Introductory remarks. In M.Bertini, L. Pizzamiglio, & S. Wapner (Eds). Field dependence in psychological theory, research, and application. (p.1-4). Hillsale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaun Associates.
• Willerman, M., & MacHarg, R. (1991). The concept map as an advance organizer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 705-712.
• Zoller, U. (1990). Students’ misunderstandings and misconceptions in general freshman chemistry (general and organic). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 1053-1065.

APA

BouJaoude, S., & Attieh, M. (2008). The Effect of Using Concept Maps as Study Tools on Achievement in Chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(3), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75345

Vancouver

BouJaoude S, Attieh M. The Effect of Using Concept Maps as Study Tools on Achievement in Chemistry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(3):233-46. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75345

AMA

BouJaoude S, Attieh M. The Effect of Using Concept Maps as Study Tools on Achievement in Chemistry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(3), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75345

Chicago

BouJaoude, Saouma, and May Attieh. "The Effect of Using Concept Maps as Study Tools on Achievement in Chemistry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2008 4 no. 3 (2008): 233-246. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75345

Harvard

BouJaoude, S., and Attieh, M. (2008). The Effect of Using Concept Maps as Study Tools on Achievement in Chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(3), pp. 233-246. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75345

MLA

BouJaoude, Saouma et al. "The Effect of Using Concept Maps as Study Tools on Achievement in Chemistry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 4, no. 3, 2008, pp. 233-246. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75345