• Berg, A. (2005). Learning Chemistry at the University level. Students' attitudes, motivation, and design of learning environment. PhD Thesis. Umea University.
• Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy. . New York: Academic press.
• Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1991). Multimodal Learning and the Quality of Intelligent Behaviour. In H. A. H. Rowe (Ed.), Intelligence: Reconceptualisation and Measurement. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
• Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., Metz, K. K., & Ash, D. B. (1997). The Developing of Science Learning Abilities in Children. In K. Härnqvist & A. Burgen (Eds.), Growing Up with Science (pp. 7-40). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
• Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of Education. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
• Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education (2 ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Eskilsson, O., & Helldén, G. (2003). A Longitudinal Study on 10-12-Year-Olds´ Conceptions of the Transformations of Matter. Chemistry Education: Research And Practice, 4(3), 291-304.
• Fraser, B. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Giddings, G. J. (1993). Development and cross-national validation of the laboratory classroom environment for senior high school science. Science Education, 77(1), 1-24.
• Fraser, B. J. (2006). Classroom Learning Environments. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 103-124). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Hofstein, A. (2004). The Laboratory In Chemistry Education: Thirty years of Experience with Developments, Implementation, and Research. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 5(3), 247-264
• Jenkins, E. W. (1999). Practical work in School Science. In J. Leach & A. Paulsen (Eds.), Practical Work in Science Education: Recent Research Studies (pp. 19-32). Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
• Lazarovitz, R., & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 94- 129). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
• Lemke, J. (2007). Re-Engineering Education in America. Retrieved 0524, 2007, from http://wwwpersonal.umich.edu/~jaylemke/papers/Re-engineering _Education.htm
• Lemke, J. L. (1988). Analysis Verbal data: Principles, Methods and Problems. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (Vol. 2, pp. 1175-1189). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
• Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P. (2006). Learning and teaching in the School Science Laboratory: An Analysis of Research, Theory, and Practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 393-441). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Mercer, N. (1995). The guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners Clevedon, Philadelphia, Adelaide: Multilingual Matters LTD.
• Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction 6(4), 359-377.
• Millar, R., Tiberghien, A., & Le Marechal, J.-F. ( 2002). Varieties of labwork: A way of profiling labwork tasks. In D. Psillos & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Teaching and learning in the science laboratory (Vol. 9-20). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publ.
• Nakhleh, M. B., Polles, J., & Malina, E. (2002). Learning Chemistry in a Laboratory Environment. In J. K. Gilbert, O. D. Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust & J. M. V. Driel (Eds.), Chemical Education Towards Research-based Practice (pp. 69-94). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academics Publishers.
• Newton, P., Driver, R. , & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
• Panizzon, D. (2003). Using a cognitive structural model to provide new insights into students’ understandings of diffusion. . International Journal of Science Education, 25(12), 1427-1450.
• Sutton, C. (1998). New Perspectives on Language in Science. In K. G. Tobin & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education I. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Taylor, P., Fraser, B., & Fisher, D. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 293-302.
• Tytler, R. (1998). Children's Conceptions of Air Pressure: Exploring the Nature of Conceptual Change. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 929-958.
• Tytler, R. (2002). Teaching for understanding in science: Student conceptions research, and changing views of learning. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 48(3), 14-21.
• Tytler, R. (2006). Re-imagining Science Education. Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
• Wells, G., & Mejia-Arauz, R. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379- 428.
• White, R. T. (1996). The link between the laboratory and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 761-774.

APA

Eskilsson, O. (2008). The Quality of Lower Secondary Students’ Discussions During Labwork in Chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(3), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75346

Vancouver

Eskilsson O. The Quality of Lower Secondary Students’ Discussions During Labwork in Chemistry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(3):247-54. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75346

AMA

Eskilsson O. The Quality of Lower Secondary Students’ Discussions During Labwork in Chemistry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2008;4(3), 247-254. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75346

Chicago

Eskilsson, Olle. "The Quality of Lower Secondary Students’ Discussions During Labwork in Chemistry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2008 4 no. 3 (2008): 247-254. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75346

Harvard

Eskilsson, O. (2008). The Quality of Lower Secondary Students’ Discussions During Labwork in Chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(3), pp. 247-254. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75346

MLA

Eskilsson, Olle "The Quality of Lower Secondary Students’ Discussions During Labwork in Chemistry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 4, no. 3, 2008, pp. 247-254. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75346