• Allen, M. B. (2005). Eight Questions on Teacher Recruitment and Retention: What Does the Research Say? Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States (NJ3).
• America Competes Reauthorization Act of 2010. Public. Law. Number. 111-358 Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ358/pdf/PLAW-111publ358.pdf.
• American Association of Physics Teacher. (n.d.). ESSA & Funding the STEM Master Teacher Corps: Fulfilling the nation’s promise for K¬12 STEM education. Retrieved from https://www.aapt.org/K12/upload/ValueofSTEMMasterTeacherCorpstoU-S.pdf.
• American Innovation and Competitiveness Act of 2017. Public. Law. Number. 114-329. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ329/PLAW-114publ329.pdf.
• Aydin, H., & Cinkaya, M. (2018). Global citizenship education and diversity (GCEDS) A measure of students’ attitudes related to social studies program in higher education. Journal for Multicultural Education, 12(3), 221-236.
• Baldi, S., Warner-Griffin, C., & Tadler, C. (2015). Education and Certification Qualifications of Public Middle Grades Teachers of Selected Subjects: Evidence from the 2011-12 Schools and Staffing Survey. NCES 2015-815. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015815.pdf.
• Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Integrative approaches among Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) subjects on Student Learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5-6), 23-37.
• Bendery, B. L. (2010). The real science gaps. Pacific Standard. Retrieved from https://psmag.com/social-justice/the-real-science-gap-16191.
• Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x.
• Brown, R., Ernst, J., Clark, A., DeLuca, B., & Kelly, D. (Eds.). (2017). STEM curricula. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 77(2), 26-29.
• Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 329(5995), 996. Retrieved from http://science.sciencemag.org/content/329/5995/996.fullhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/329/5995/996.full.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000.
• Duncan, A., (2010). Using Technology to Transform Schools—Remarks by Secretary Arne Duncan at the Association of American Publishers Annual Meeting. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/news/speeches/2010/03/03032010.html.
• Dwight D. Eisenhower Professional Development--Federal Activities Program, CFDA No. 84.168. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/pubs/Biennial/95-96/eval/614-97.pdf.
• Education Policy. (n.d.). NCLB. Retrieved from https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/policy-explainers/early-ed-prek-12/federal-education-legislation/essa/nclb/.
• Education Post. (n.d.). The ABC’s of ESEA, ESSA and No Child Left Behind. Retrieved from http://educationpost.org/the-abcs-of-esea-essa-and-no-child-left-behind/.
• Education Week. (1994). Summary of the Improving America’s School Act. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/1994/11/09/10asacht.h14.html.
• ESSA. (2018). Every Student Succeeds Act. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/essa.
• Fensom, A. (2017). Asia to stay world’s fastest-growing region through 2030. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2017/12/asia-to-stay-worlds-fastest-growing-region-through-2030/.
• Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
• Green, M. (2007). Science and engineering degrees: 1966-2004. (NSF 07–307). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
• Hill, J., & Stearns, C. (2015). Education and certification qualifications of departmentalized public high school-level teachers of selected subjects: Evidence from the 2011-12 schools and staffing survey. NCES 2015-814. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
• Hopstock, P. J., & Pelczar, M. P. (2011). Technical report and user’s guide for the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA): 2009 data files and database with US specific variables. NCES 2011-025. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
• Hussar, W. J., & Bailey, T. M. (2017). Projections of education statistics to 2025. NCES 2017-019. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
• Hutchinson, F. E., & Das, S. B. (Eds.). (2016). Asia and the middle-income trap. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315677606.
• Ilhan, F., Ozfidan, B., & Yilmaz, S. (2019). Home Visit Effectiveness on Students’ Classroom Behavior and Academic Achievement. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(1), 61-80.
• Improving America’s School Act of 1994. Public. Law. Number. 103-382. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/103/bills/hr6/BILLS-103hr6enr.pdf.
• Kastberg, D., Chan, J. Y., & Murray, G. (2016). Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in science, reading, and mathematics literacy in an international context: First look at PISA. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017048.pdf.
• Killewald, A., & Xie, Y. (2013). American science education in its global and historical contexts. Bridge, 43(1), 15-23.
• Klein, A. (2015). No Child Left Behind: An Overview. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/section/multimedia/no-child-left-behind-overview-definition-summary.html.
• Kuenzi, J. J., Matthews, C. M., & Mangan, B. F. (2006). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education issues and legislative options. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Congressional Research Service.
• Laboy-Rush, D. (2011). Integrated STEM education through project-based learning. Portland, OR: Learning. Com. Retrieved from http://www.rondout.k12.ny.us/common/pages/DisplayFile.aspx.
• Lee, A. M. I. (n.d.). No Child Left Behind (NCLB): What you need to know. Retrieved from https://www.
• understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know.
• Lockheed, M. (2015). Why do countries participate in international large-scale assessments? The Case of PISA. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7447. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=2676416.
• Machi, E. (2009). Improving US competitiveness with K-12 STEM education and training. Heritage special report. SR-57. A report on the STEM education and National Security Conference, October 21-23, 2008. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505842.pdf.
• Madden, L., Beyers, J., & O’Brien, S. (2016). The importance of STEM education in the elementary grades: Learning from pre-service and novice teachers’ perspectives. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 1-18.
• Martin, M., Mullis, I., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in science. Boston, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Centre, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
• McLaughlin, M. (1975). Evaluation and reform: The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Title I. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
• Mills, A. (2017). What is STEM education? Retrieved from http://www.mtu.edu/news/stories/2017/september/what-stem-education.html.
• Morrison, W. M. (2018). China’s Economic Rise: History, Trends, Challenges, and Implications for the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
• Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2017). TIMSS 2019 assessment frameworks. Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/frameworks/.
• Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
• NASSP. (n.d.). Every Student Succeed Act (ESSA) Overview. Retrieved from https://www.nassp.org/policy-advocacy-center/resources/essa-toolkit/essa-fact-sheets/every-student-succeeds-act-essa-overview/.
• National Association of School Psychologists. (2018). Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). Retrieved from https://www.nasponline.org/research-and-policy/current-law-and-policy-priorities/current-law/elementary-and-secondary-education-act-(esea).
• NCES. (2013). The nation’s report card: Trends in academic progress 2012 (NCES 2013 456). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
• NCES. (n.d. a). NAEP overview. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/.
• NCES. (n.d. b). TIMSS overview. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/timss/.
• NCES. (n.d. c). NTPS overview. Retrieved https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ntps/overview.asp.
• NCES. (n.d. d). National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/about/.
• NRC. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
• NSB. (2018a). Science and engineering indicators 2018. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/.
• NSB. (2018b). Science and engineering indicators 2018 digest. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/digest/.
• NSTC. (2013). Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) edu. 5-year strategic plan. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/stem_stratplan_2013.pdf.
• Ntemngwa, C., & Oliver, S. (2018). The implementation of integrated science technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) instruction using robotics in the middle school science classroom. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(1), 12-40. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.380617.
• OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 technical report. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2015-technical-report/.
• OECD. (n.d. a). About the OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/about/.
• Ozfidan, B., & Burlbaw, L. M. (2016). Perceptions of bilingual education model in Spain: How to implement a bilingual education model in Turkey. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 49-58.
• Ozfidan, B., & de Miranda, M. A. (2017). K12 Teacher Credentialing Containing Engineering Content in the USA. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76888.
• Ozfidan, B., & Toprak, M. (2019). Cultural Awareness on A Bilingual Education: A Mixed Method Study. Multicultural Learning and Teaching.
• Ozfidan, B., Cavlazoglu, B., Burlbaw, L., & Aydin, H. (2017). Reformed Teaching and Learning in Science Education: A Comparative Study of Turkish and US Teachers. Journal of Education and Learning. 6 (3), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n3p23.
• Sanders, M. E. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.
• Snyder, T. D., de Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2018). Digest of education statistics 2016 (NCES 2017-094). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017094.pdf.
• Synder, T. (1993). 120 Years of American education: A statistical portrait. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93442.pdf.
• Tanenbaum, C. (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. Retrieved from https://innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/stem/.
• Toppo, G. (2008). U.S. students’ math, science scores deliver mixed results. Retrieved from https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/mathscience/2008-12-09-math-sci-scores_n.htm.
• U.S. Department of Education. (1995). The improving America’s Schools Act of 1994. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/offices/OESE/archives/legislation/ESEA/brochure/iasa-bro.html.
• U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Eisenhower Regional Mathematics and Science Education Consortia. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/programs/encconsortia/index.html?exp=0.

APA

Kocabas, S., Ozfidan, B., & Burlbaw, L. M. (2020). American STEM Education in Its Global, National, and Linguistic Contexts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), em1810. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108618

Vancouver

Kocabas S, Ozfidan B, Burlbaw LM. American STEM Education in Its Global, National, and Linguistic Contexts. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(1):em1810. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108618

AMA

Kocabas S, Ozfidan B, Burlbaw LM. American STEM Education in Its Global, National, and Linguistic Contexts. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(1), em1810. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108618

Chicago

Kocabas, Sezai, Burhan Ozfidan, and Lynn M. Burlbaw. "American STEM Education in Its Global, National, and Linguistic Contexts". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 1 (2020): em1810. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108618

Harvard

Kocabas, S., Ozfidan, B., and Burlbaw, L. M. (2020). American STEM Education in Its Global, National, and Linguistic Contexts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), em1810. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108618

MLA

Kocabas, Sezai et al. "American STEM Education in Its Global, National, and Linguistic Contexts". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 1, 2020, em1810. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108618