Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Anderson, A. R., Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., & Lehr, C. A. (2004). Check & connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42(2), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.01.002
• Arseven, A. (2015). Mathematical modelling approach in mathematics education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(12), 973-980. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2015.031204
• Bedada, T. B. (2024). The use of educational technology (Ed Tech) to improve student’s learning rational functions: Conceptual and procedural understanding. Journal of Science of Learning and Innovations, 1(2), 171-199. https://doi.org/10.1163/29497736-bja00009
• Blomhøj, M., & Carreira, S. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematical applications and modelling in the teaching and learning of mathematics: Proceedings from Topic Study Group 21 at the 11^th International Congress on Mathematical Education in Monterrey, Mexico, July 6-13, 2008. Roskilde Universitet.
• Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878
• DBE. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement (CAPS) further education and training (grades 10-12). Department of Basic Education, Republic of South Africa.
• Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
• Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763-782). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
• Freudenthal, H. (1968). Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426224
• Frejd, P. (2014). Modes of mathematical modelling an analysis of how modelling is used and interpreted in and out of school settings. Linkopings Universitet, Sweden.
• Joshi, A., Kale, S., Saket, C., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 7(4), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
• Joshi, D. R., Adhikari, K. P, Khanal, B., Khadka, J., & Belbase, S. (2022). Behavioral, cognitive, emotional and social engagement in mathematics learning during COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE, 17(11), Article e0278052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278052
• Machaba, F., & Bedada, T. (2022). University lecturers’ preparedness to use technology in teacher training of mathematics during COVID-19: The case of Ethiopia. South African Journal of Higher Education, 36(1), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-1-4560
• McLeod, S. (2018). Erik Erikson's stages of psychosocial development. Simply Psychology, 3(2), 1-3.
• Mocinic, S. (2012). Active teaching strategies in higher education. Metodički Obzori, 7(2), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.32728/mo.07.2.2012.08
• Perth and Kinross Council. (2012). School engagement: A review of learning from school engagement action research. Perth and Kinross Council. https://www.pkc.gov.uk/
• Perth and Kinross Council. (2015). Briefing paper ‘academic knowledge’ about school engagement. Perth and Kinross Council. https://www.pkc.gov.uk/
• Sekerak, J. (2010). Phases of mathematical modelling and compliance of high school students. The Teaching of Mathematics, 8(2), 105-112.
• Stephen, M. (2011). Engagement in mathematics: Defining the challenge and promoting good practices. Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. https://www.vic.gov.au/education
• Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001
• Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions. A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction–Wiskobas project. Reidel Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3707-9
• Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2000). Mathematics education in the Netherlands: A guided tour. Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University, Netherlands.
• Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 521-525). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_170
• Watt, H. M. G., Carmichael, C., & Callingham, R. (2017). Students’ engagement profiles in mathematics according to learning environment dimensions: Developing an evidence base for best practice in mathematics education. School Psychology International, 38(2), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316688373

APA

Bekene, T., Machaba, M., & Kuona, G. (2025). Grade 11 learners’ views on their engagement with mathematics through mathematical modelling. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(6), em2653. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16514

Vancouver

Bekene T, Machaba M, Kuona G. Grade 11 learners’ views on their engagement with mathematics through mathematical modelling. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(6):em2653. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16514

AMA

Bekene T, Machaba M, Kuona G. Grade 11 learners’ views on their engagement with mathematics through mathematical modelling. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2025;21(6), em2653. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16514

Chicago

Bekene, Tola, MF Machaba, and Gumisai Kuona. "Grade 11 learners’ views on their engagement with mathematics through mathematical modelling". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2025 21 no. 6 (2025): em2653. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16514

Harvard

Bekene, T., Machaba, M., and Kuona, G. (2025). Grade 11 learners’ views on their engagement with mathematics through mathematical modelling. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(6), em2653. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16514

MLA

Bekene, Tola et al. "Grade 11 learners’ views on their engagement with mathematics through mathematical modelling". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 6, 2025, em2653. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16514