Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Adel, A. (2022). Future of Industry 5.0 in society: Human-centric solutions, challenges, and prospective research areas. Journal of Cloud Computing, 11, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-022-00314-5
• Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
• Azahar, S., & Cheng, C. (2024). Understanding Malaysia’s decline in PISA scores: Causes and consequences (policy brief). Institute of Strategic & Institute of Strategic & International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia. https://www.isis.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Understanding-Malaysias-decline-in-PISA-scores.pdf
• Barata, J., & Kayser, I. (2023). Industry 5.0: Past, present, and near future. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 778-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.351
• Bogard, T., Liu, M., Chiang, Y. H., & Chiang, Y. V. (2013). Thresholds of knowledge development in complex problem solving: A multiple-case study of advanced learners’ cognitive processes. Teacher Education Faculty Publications. 24. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/edt_fac_pub/24
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Bulu, S. T., & Pedersen, S. (2010). Scaffolding middle school students’ content knowledge and ill-structured problem solving in a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 507-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9150-9
• Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21^st century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a
• Changwong, K., Sukkamart, A., & Sisan, B. (2018). Critical thinking skill development: Analysis of a new learning management model for Thai high schools. Journal of International Studies, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/3
• Chinn, C. A., & Clark, D. B. (2013). Learning through collaborative argumentation. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 314-332). Routledge.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
• Dewi, L., Susilana, R., Setiawan, B., Alias, N., & Zulnaidi, H. (2023). A proposed problem-centered thinking skill (PCTS) model. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 615-638. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16333a
• DeWitt, D., & Alias, N. (2023). Creative digital pedagogies for student engagement. In R. Rasiah, W. Y. Low, & N. Kamaruddin (Eds.), Digitalization and development: Ecosystem for promoting industrial revolution 4.0 technologies in Malaysia. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003367093-7
• DeWitt, D., & Alias, N. (2024). Cognitive mindtools for problem-centered learning in the digital age. In F. D. Yusop, U. K. Mohd Salleh, & H. L. Chin (Eds.), Curriculum foundations and innovations for the digital age. UM Press.
• DeWitt, D., Alias, N & Siraj, S. (2014). The design and development of a Collaborative mLearning prototype for Malaysian secondary school science. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(4), 461-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9340-y
• DeWitt, D., & Sukhoverkhov, A. (2023). Industrialisation and internationalisation of education in the context of Economy 4.0. Journal of Research in International Education, 22(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/14752409231169609
• DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Palraj, S., & Siraj, S. (2018). Problem-solving strategies among science teachers in the state of Selangor, Malaysia. In K. Persichitte, A. Suparman, & M. Spector (Eds.), Educational technology to improve quality and access on a global scale (pp. 123-141). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66227-5_10
• Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2014). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Disa, N. M. (2022). Tahap penguasaan kemahiran proses sains pelajar tingkatan empat aliran sains di daerah Kuala Muda/Yan, Kedah. [Level of acquistion of science process skills among form four science stream students in Kuala Muda/Yan, Kedah]. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 4(3), 257-264. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/19844
• Doymuş, K., Karaçöp, A., & Şimşek, U. (2010). Effects of jigsaw and animation techniques on students’ understanding. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 671-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9157-2
• ExpressVPN (2025, February 10). Survey: Is Facebook still relevant in 2025? ExpressVPN. https://www.expressvpn.com/blog/do-people-still-use-facebook/?srsltid=AfmBOopghGvvtsLHDxK8eYysUYmnBXIJUt1WfC7km9jy_O_SrqLyL53q
• Firdayanti, Emiliyana, M. P., Fitriah, S., Kurniati, U. & Mahmud (2024). Teacher and student’s pedagogical tasks using Canva as media for English Language Teaching (ELT) in developing creativity for high school. International Journal of English Language Studies. 6(2), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2024.6.2.19
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Gagic, M. (2025, July 3). Top tech tools every association should be using in 2025. Strauss Event & Association Management. https://www.strauss.ca/top-tech-tools-every-association-should-be-using-in-2025
• Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 147-179. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023477131081
• Gul, M., & Akcay, H. (2020). Structuring a new socioscientific issues (SSI) based instruction model: Impacts on pre-service science teachers’(PSTs) critical thinking skills and dispositions. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.785
• Henriksen, D., Cain, W., Mishra, P., & the Deep-Play Research Group. (2014b). Making sense of what you see: Patterning as a trans-disciplinary habit of mind. TechTrends, 58(5), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0776-z
• Henriksen, D., Cain, W., Mishra, P., & the Deep-Play Research Group. (2014a). Abstracting as a trans-disciplinary habit of mind. TechTrends, 58(6), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0794-x
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2013). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001
• Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
• Jonassen, D. H. (2013). First principles of learning. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), Learning, problem solving, and mindtools. Routledge.
• Jonassen, D. H., & Kim, B. (2010). Arguing to learn and learning to argue. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9143-8
• Kim, M. K. (2012). Theoretically grounded guidelines for assessing learning progress. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 601-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9247-4
• Lai Wah, L., & Hashim, H. (2021). Determining pre-service teachers’ intention of using technology for teaching English as a Second Language (ESL). Sustainability, 13(14), Article 7568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147568
• Majeed, B. H., Fouad Jawad, L., & AlRikabi, H. T. S. (2021). Tactical thinking and its relationship with solving mathematical problems among mathematics department students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(09), 247-262. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i09.22203
• Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 937-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2
• Mayweg-Paus, E., Zimmermann, M., Le, N.-T., & Pinkwart, N. (2021). A review of technologies for collaborative online information seeking: On the contribution of collaborative argumentation. Education and Information Technology, 26, 2053-2089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10345-7
• McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2016). Factors impacting teachers’ argumentation instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 2026-2046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1221547
• Ministry of Education Malaysia (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013 – 2025: Preschool to post secondary. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Author.
• Mohd Tajudin, N., Setambah, M. A. B., Hassan, N., Rajak, N. A., & Adnan, M. (2019). Synergizing mathematical learning for future ready curriculum using adventure-based learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 778-794. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6719
• OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: Country notes–Malaysia. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9a58c83f-en
• OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Country notes–Malaysia. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/f6edc3c2-en
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
• Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Palraj, S., DeWitt, D., & Alias, N. (2015). Malaysian secondary school teachers beliefs in problem solving. Proceedings of 4th International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE) Conference Nov 2015 (pp. 387-397). University of Mandanao, Sulawesi, Indonesia
• Palraj, S., DeWitt, D., & Alias, N. (2016). Development of a problem-centered teaching strategies questionnaire [Paper presentation]. Persidangan Kebangsaan Kurikulum Masa Depan 2016 [National Conference for Futures Curriculum 2016], University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
• Pinto, M., & Leite, C. (2020). Digital technologies in support of students’ learning. Digital Education Review, 37, 343-360. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.343-360
• Rahmawati, Y., Taylor, E., Taylor, P. C., Ridwan, A., & Mardiah, A. (2022). Students’ engagement in education as sustainability. Sustainability, 14(6), Article 3554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063554
• Saido, G. A. M., Siraj, S., DeWitt, D., & Al-Amedy, O. S. (2018). Development of an instructional model for higher order thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 847-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1452307
• Spector, J. M. (2010). Mental representations and their analysis. In D. Ifenthaler, P. Pirnay-Dummer, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Computer-based diagnostics and systematic analysis of knowledge (pp. 27-40). Springer.
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
• Techanamurthy, U., Alias, N., & Dewitt, & D. (2018). Problem-solving strategies among culinary arts students in community colleges. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 10(1). https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/view/1921
• Tee, M. Y., Samuel, M., Norjoharuddeen, M. N., Renuka, V. S., & Hutkemri. (2018). Classroom practice and the quality of teaching: Where a nation is going? Journal of International and Comparative Education, 7, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.14425/jice.2018.7.1.17
• Toledo, S., & Dubas, J. M. (2016). Encouraging higher-order thinking in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00184
• Vagias, W. M. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson University. https://media.clemson.edu/cbshs/prtm/research/resources-for-research-page-2/Vagias-Likert-Type-Scale-Response-Anchors.pdf
• Watson, A. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and pedagogical practice. Language and Education, 29, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1016955
• Wilson, D. M., & Narasuman, S. (2020). Teachers’ implementation of higher order thinking skills. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(1), 70-84. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i1.8991
• Xenofontos, C., & Andrews, P. (2012). Prospective teachers’ beliefs about problem-solving: Cypriot and English cultural constructions. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.657439
• Yang, I (2025, November 6). Telegram vs. WhatsApp — Which App to choose for business communications in 2025. Lark Technologies. https://www.larksuite.com/en_us/blog/telegram-vs-whatsapp
• Zhang, J., & Patel, V. L. (2006). Distributed cognition, representation, and affordance. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(2), 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.2.12zha

APA

DeWitt, D., Kathavarayan, A., Alias, N., Jamaludin, K. A., Halili, S. H., Zulnaidi, H., Susilana, R., & Dewi, L. (2026). Problem-solving practices, beliefs, and digital mindtool use among Malaysian secondary school science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(4), em2808. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18153

Vancouver

DeWitt D, Kathavarayan A, Alias N, Jamaludin KA, Halili SH, Zulnaidi H, et al. Problem-solving practices, beliefs, and digital mindtool use among Malaysian secondary school science teachers. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(4):em2808. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18153

AMA

DeWitt D, Kathavarayan A, Alias N, et al. Problem-solving practices, beliefs, and digital mindtool use among Malaysian secondary school science teachers. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2026;22(4), em2808. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18153

Chicago

DeWitt, Dorothy, Arhunna Kathavarayan, Norlidah Alias, Khairul Azhar Jamaludin, Siti Hajar Halili, Hutkemri Zulnaidi, Rudi Susilana, and Laksmi Dewi. "Problem-solving practices, beliefs, and digital mindtool use among Malaysian secondary school science teachers". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2026 22 no. 4 (2026): em2808. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18153

Harvard

DeWitt, D., Kathavarayan, A., Alias, N., Jamaludin, K. A., Halili, S. H., Zulnaidi, H., . . . Dewi, L. (2026). Problem-solving practices, beliefs, and digital mindtool use among Malaysian secondary school science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(4), em2808. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18153

MLA

DeWitt, Dorothy et al. "Problem-solving practices, beliefs, and digital mindtool use among Malaysian secondary school science teachers". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 22, no. 4, 2026, em2808. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18153