The Mathematics and Science
Integration Argument:
A Stand for Teacher Education

Joseph M. Furner; David D. Kumar

doi:10.12973/ejmste/75397

The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education

Full Text (PDF)

Joseph M. Furner ¹ ^* , David D. Kumar ¹

More Detail

¹ Florida Atlantic University, FL, USA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This paper explores the question, should we integrate mathematics and science in reforming science education? As science, especially physical science involves mathematics, and both subjects involve process skills, integrating science and mathematics methods courses might be a way to improve science education. Considerations and recommendations for mathematics and science integration are addressed.

Keywords

mathematics
science
integration
teacher preparation
policy
Interdisciplinary
standards
technology

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2007, Volume 3, Issue 3, 185-189

https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397

Publication date: 23 Oct 2007

Article Views: 7354

Article Downloads: 6787

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Antonellis, G. & James, G. (1973). Cross discipline planning. Salt Lake City, Utah: Olympus Publishing Company.
Beane, J. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616-622.
Beane, J. (1992). Creating an integrative curriculum: Making the connections. NASSP Bulletin, 76(547), 46-54.
Berlin, D. F., & Kyungpook, H. L. (2005). Integrating science and mathematics education: Historical analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 105(5), 15-24.
Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (1992). Report from the NSF/SSMA Wingspread Conference: A Network for Integrated Science and Mathematics Teaching and Learning. School Science and Mathematics, 92(6), 340-342.
Friend, H. (1985). The effect of science and math integration on selected seventh grade students’ attitudes toward and achievement in science. School Science and Mathematics, 85 (6), 453-461.
Frykholm, J., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction: Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105 (3), 127-141.
Furner, J. M., Doan-Holbein, M. F., & Scullion-Jackson, K. (2000). Taking an internet field trip: Promoting cultural and historical diversity through Mayan mathematics. TechTrends, 44(6), 18-22.
Furner, J. M., & Ramirez, M. (1999). Making Connections: Using GIS to Integrate Mathematics and Science. TechTrends, 43(4 ), 34-39.
Haigh, W. E. (1985). Improvement of under prepared mathematics and science teachers. Washington, D. C.: National Science Foundation.
Jacobs, H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Koirala, H. P., & Bowman, J. K. (2003). Preparing middle level preservice teachers to integrate mathematics and science: Problems and possibilities. School Science and Mathematics, 145(10), 145-154.
Kumar, D. D., & Sherwood, R. D. (1997). Hypermedia in science and mathematics: Applications in teacher education, problem solving and student testing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(3), 249-262.
McBride, J. W. & Silverman, F. L. (1991). Integrating elementary/middle school science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 91(7), 18-25.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM: Reston, VA.: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Professional assessment standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Resource Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Pyke, C.L., & Lynch, S. (2005). Mathematics and science teachers’ preparation for national board of teaching standards certification. School Science and Mathematics, 105 (5), 25-35.
Robinson, L. (1994). Interdisciplinary planning and instruction. Handout made for Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Workshop on May 30, 1994 for Tuscaloosa City High Schools.
Sunal, D., & Furner, J. M., (1995). Teaching Mathematics and Science Not Mathematics or Science. Presentation at the NASA Teacher Enrichment Program Mid-Year Workshop at the Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama, March 18, 1995.
Utley, J., Moseley, C., & Bryant, R. (2005). Relationship between science and mathematics teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 82-88.
Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., and Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
Wolfe, L. F. (1990). Teaching science to gifted underachievers: A conflict of goals. Journal of Education, 6(1), 88-97.
Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., and Hyde, A. (2005). Best practice: New standards for teaching and learning in America’s school (3rd Edition). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

How to cite this article

APA

Furner, J. M., & Kumar, D. D. (2007). The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397

Vancouver

Furner JM, Kumar DD. The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2007;3(3):185-9. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397

AMA

Furner JM, Kumar DD. The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2007;3(3), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397

Chicago

Furner, Joseph M., and David D. Kumar. "The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2007 3 no. 3 (2007): 185-189. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397

Harvard

Furner, J. M., and Kumar, D. D. (2007). The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(3), pp. 185-189. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397

MLA

Furner, Joseph M. et al. "The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 3, no. 3, 2007, pp. 185-189. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75397