A Review of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian Perspective

Kamaleswaran Jayarajah; Rohaida Mohd Saat; Rose Amnah Abdul Rauf

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a

Full Text (PDF)

Kamaleswaran Jayarajah ¹, Rohaida Mohd Saat ¹ ^* , Rose Amnah Abdul Rauf ¹

More Detail

¹ University of Malaya, MALAYSIA
^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the research base of STEM education in Malaysia through an analysis review of articles for a 14-year period, from 1999 to 2013. The research base review focuses on identifying four characteristics of STEM education: a) temporal distribution, b) the research areas involved in each discipline, c) the types of participants, and d) the methodological design employed. Published journals from web-based service providers were selected according to the original author’s discussion of STEM education in the articles. The findings summarize the core consistencies of STEM education literature across the STEM disciplines throughout the years by identifying the STEM-related content addressed by professionals in their respective fields.

Keywords

science
technology
Engineering &
Mathematics
STEM
education
review

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2014 - Volume 10 Issue 3, pp. 155-163

Publication date: 15 Dec 2014

Article Views: 6759

Article Downloads: 2923

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Ali, A. T. (September, 2012). Teaching & learning of science & mathematics in schools: towards a more"creative & innovative Malaysia". Paper presented at the Colloquium Science & Mathematic Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Bagiati, A., Yoon, S.Y., Evangelou, D., Ngambeki, I. (2010). Engineering curricula in early education: describing the landscape of open resources. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2), 2-13.
Bartholomew, R., Anderson, D., Moeed, A. (2012). Resilience of Science Teaching Philosophies and Practice in Early Career Primary Teaching Graduates. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(2), 103-112.
Brown, J., Brown R., & Merrill, C. (2012). Science and technology educators’ enacted curriculum: areas of possible collaboration for an integrative STEM approach in public schools. Technology Teacher, 71(4), 30- 34.
Bybee, R. W & Fuchs, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 349-352.
Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 471-486.
DeJarnette, N. K. (2012). America's children: Providing early exposure to STEM (Science,Technology, Engineering and Maths) initiatives. Journal of Education, 133(1), 77-84.
Ellis, P. D. (2011). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis and the interpretation of research results. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Goldberg M. A. (2002). Human Capacity Building for APEC Science, Technology & Innovation: Preconditions & Key Issues to Succeed. (Proceeding APEC-ISTWG Forum Paper Summary. APRU-APEC Committee, Berkeley California.
Hernandez, P. R., Bodin, R., Elliott, J. W., Ibrahim, B., Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., & de Miranda, M.A. (inpress). Connecting the STEM dots: Measuring the effect of an integrated engineering design intervention. International Journal of Technology and Design Education http://doi: 10.1007/s10798-013-9241-0
Humphrey, S. E. (2011). What does a great meta-analysis look like? Organizational Psychology Review, 1(2), 99-103.
Jones, A., Buntting, C. &Vries, M. J. (2013). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology Design Education 23, 191- 212.
Kabilan, M. K. (2003). Online professional development of teachers: An examination of structures and trends in Malaysia. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(4), 367-382.
Kieong, C. K. (2012). Vision 100K. Paper presented at the TheInstituitionof Engineers, 53rd Presidental Address, Malaysia.
Lindahl, B. (2003). Pupils' responses to school science and technology? : A longitudinal study of pathways to upper secondary school.Unpublished summary of PhD thesis, University of Gothenburg, Kristianstad.
Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., Foy, P., &Stanco, G.M. (2012).TIMSS 2011 International results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Meyrick, M. K. (2011). How STEM Education Impress Student Learning. Meridian K-12 School Computer Technologies Journal, 14(1), 1-6.
Mena, I. B., Diefes-Dux, H.A. (2012). First-year engineering students' portrayal of engineering in a proposed museum exhibit for middle school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology 21(2), 304-316.
Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI). (2008).2008 Report: Malaysian science and technology indicatiors. Putrajaya: Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre, MOSTI.
Narayan, R., Park, S., Peker, D., Suh, J. (2013). Students’ Images of Scientists and Doing Science: An International Comparison Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(2), 115-129.
Nordin, K. (2012). JumlahPelajarSains Di IPT Makin Kurang, BeritaHarian [The Total Science Students at Local Varsities Are Decreasing]. Retrieved from Berita Harian. Retrieved from http://www.bharian.com.my/articles/Jumlahpelaj arsainsdiIPTmakinkurang/Article/
OECD (2010), PISA 2009 at a Glance, OECD Publishing. (Available at:http://www.oecd.org/pisa/46660259.pdf )
Petroski, H. (2010). The essential engineer: Why science alone will not solve our global problems. New York: Vintage Books: A division of random house.
Poll, H. (2004). American Perspectives on Engineers and Engineering: Reveals Public Perceptions of Engineering: 1998. from American Association of Engineering Societies. Retrieved from: http://www.aaes.org/ harris2004_files/frame.htm.
The Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing & Midwifery (2001). An introduction to systematicreviews. Changing Practice, 1, 1-6.
Reigeluth, C. M & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009). Instructionaldesign theories and models (Volume III). London: Routledge.
Rhoads, T. R., Walden, S. E., Winter, B. A (2004). Sooner Element Engineering and Science (SEES) a model for after school science clubs based on university and K-5 partnership.Journal of STEM Education, 5(3), 47-52.
Saat, R. M. (2012). Practices in Mathematics & Science Education: A Reflection. In S. N. Akmar (Ed.), What We Learned From Science Education Reform: The Malaysian Experience. Selangor Darul Ehsan: Pearson Malaysia.
Singh, K., Granville. M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and Science Achievement: Effects of Motivation, Interest, and Academic Engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2010). Education for all.Global monitoring report.Retrived from: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/le ading-the-international-agenda/efareport/reports/
U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Report of the Academic Competitiveness Council. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from :http://coalition4evidence.org/wp-content/ uploads/ ACC-report-final.pdf
Yarker, M, B., Park, S. (2012). Analysis of Teaching Resources for Implementing an Interdisciplinary Approach in the K-12 Classroom. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(4), 223-232.

How to cite this article

APA

Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., & Rauf, R. A. A. (2014). A Review of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a

Vancouver

Jayarajah K, Saat RM, Rauf RAA. A Review of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian Perspective. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(3):155-63. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a

AMA

Jayarajah K, Saat RM, Rauf RAA. A Review of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian Perspective. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(3), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a

Chicago

Jayarajah, Kamaleswaran, Rohaida Mohd Saat, and Rose Amnah Abdul Rauf. "A Review of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian Perspective". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2014 10 no. 3 (2014): 155-163. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a

Harvard

Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., and Rauf, R. A. A. (2014). A Review of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), pp. 155-163. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a

MLA

Jayarajah, Kamaleswaran et al. "A Review of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999–2013: A Malaysian Perspective". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 10, no. 3, 2014, pp. 155-163. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1072a